PEG

Prezzo Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG

PEG
$81,82
-$0,22(-0,26%)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-17 17:29 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-17 17:29, Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) is priced at $81,82, with a total market cap of $40,95B, a P/E ratio of 18,98, and a dividend yield of 3,12%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $80,86 and $82,17. The current price is 1,18% above the day's low and 0,42% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 1,49M. Over the past 52 weeks, PEG has traded between $80,30 to $84,44, and the current price is -3,10% away from the 52-week high.

PEG Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$80,94
Market Cap$40,95B
Volume1,49M
P/E Ratio18,98
Dividend Yield (TTM)3,12%
Dividend Amount$0,67
Diluted EPS (TTM)4,23
Net Income (FY)$2,11B
Revenue (FY)$12,16B
Earnings Date2026-04-29
EPS Estimate1,46
Revenue Estimate$3,52B
Shares Outstanding505,93M
Beta (1Y)0.598
Ex-Dividend Date2026-03-10
Dividend Payment Date2026-03-31

About PEG

Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated, through its subsidiaries, operates as an energy company primarily in the Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic United States. It operates through two segments, PSE&G and PSEG Power. The PSE&G segment transmits electricity; distributes electricity and gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers, as well as invests in solar generation projects, and energy efficiency and related programs; and offers appliance services and repairs. As of December 31, 2021, it had electric transmission and distribution system of 25,000 circuit miles and 862,000 poles; 56 switching stations with an installed capacity of 39,353 megavolt-amperes (MVA), and 235 substations with an installed capacity of 9,285 MVA; four electric distribution headquarters and five electric sub-headquarters; and 18,000 miles of gas mains, 12 gas distribution headquarters, two sub-headquarters, and one meter shop, as well as 58 natural gas metering and regulating stations. Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated was incorporated in 1985 and is based in Newark, New Jersey.
SectorUtilities
IndustryRegulated Electric
CEORalph A. LaRossa
HeadquartersNewark,NJ,US

Ulteriori informazioni su Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)

Blogs

UmV2aXNpb25lIGRlbGzigJlpbmNpZGVudGUgZGkgZGVwZWdnaW5nIGRpIFVTRDE6IHVuIGF0dGFjY28gY29vcmRpbmF0byBjb250cm8gVVNEMSBlIFdMRkk/

SWwgdGVhbSBkaSBXTEZJIGhhIHN1Y2Nlc3NpdmFtZW50ZSBkaWNoaWFyYXRvIGNoZSwgZ3JhemllIGFsIHNvbGlkbyBtZWNjYW5pc21vIGRpIG1pbnRpbmcgZSByZWRlbXB0aW9uIGRpIFVTRDEgZSBhbCBzdW8gcGllbm8gc3VwcG9ydG8gcGF0cmltb25pYWxlIDE6MSwgbGEgc3RhYmxlY29pbiBoYSByYXBpZGFtZW50ZSByZWN1cGVyYXRvIGlsIHBlZyBlIGlsIHRlbnRhdGl2byBkZWxs4oCZYXR0YWNjYW50ZSDDqCBpbmZpbmUgZmFsbGl0by4=

2026-02-24

VVNEMSBTdGFibGVjb2luIGltcHJvdnZpc2FtZW50ZSBwZXJkZSBpbCBwZWcgc290dG8gJDE6IFdMRkkgc2VnbmFsYSBhdHRhY2NvIGNvb3JkaW5hdG8sIGkgdG9rZW4gYSB0ZW1hIFRydW1wIGF1bWVudGFubyBpIHJpc2NoaQ==

TGEgc3RhYmxlY29pbiBVU0QxIGRlbCBwcm9nZXR0byBXTEZJIGRlbGxhIGZhbWlnbGlhIFRydW1wIGhhIHRlbXBvcmFuZWFtZW50ZSBwZXJzbyBs4oCZYW5jb3JhZ2dpbywgc2NlbmRlbmRvIGEgJDAsOTk0LiBTZWNvbmRvIGZvbnRpIHVmZmljaWFsaSwgaWwgdG9rZW4gw6ggc3RhdG8gb2dnZXR0byBkaSB1biBhdHRhY2NvIGNvb3JkaW5hdG8uIFF1ZXN0byBhcnRpY29sbyBhbmFsaXp6YSBs4oCZdWx0aW1vIHByZXp6byBkaSBXTEZJIGEgJDAsMTA4NiBlIGZvcm5pc2NlIHVuYSBwcmV2aXNpb25lIHN1bGxhIHN1YSBwb3NzaWJpbGUgZXZvbHV6aW9uZSBmdXR1cmEu

2026-02-24

QWdnaW9ybmFtZW50byBzdWwgcHJlenpvIGRpIEVUSDogYW5hbGlzaSBlIHByb3NwZXR0aXZlIHBpw7kgcmVjZW50aSBwZXIgRXRoZXJldW0vVVNEVCBhbCAyMiBnZW5uYWlv

SW4gdW4gbWVyY2F0byBjcnlwdG8gY2FyYXR0ZXJpenphdG8gZGEgZm9ydGUgdm9sYXRpbGl0w6AsIEV0aGVyZXVtIMOoIHJpc2FsaXRvIHNvcHJhIGxhIHNvZ2xpYSBkZWkgMy4wMDAgZG9sbGFyaSBpbCAyMiBnZW5uYWlvLCBtZW50cmUgVGV0aGVyIHNpIMOoIG1hbnRlbnV0byBzdGFiaWxlIGNvbWUgc2VtcHJlLCByZXN0YW5kbyB2aWNpbm8gYWwgc3VvIHBlZyBkaSAxIGRvbGxhcm8u

2026-01-22

Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) FAQ

What's the stock price of Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) today?

x
Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) is currently trading at $81,82, with a 24h change of -0,26%. The 52-week trading range is $80,30–$84,44.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)?

x

Should you buy or sell Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)?

x

How to buy Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG) Latest News

2026-04-13 07:22

USDD 从 Spark 取回 1.09 亿枚 USDT,补充进 PSM 稳定池

Gate News 消息,4 月 13 日,据余烬监测,USDD 于 1 小时前从借贷平台 Spark 取回 1.09 亿枚 USDT,随后补充进 USDD 的 PSM 池(Peg Stability Module,锚定稳定模块)。目前 USDD 兑换 USDT 的可用流动性为 4200 万美元。

2026-03-25 07:57

Jump Trading 回应 Terraform 40 亿美元诉讼,称指控意在“推卸责任”

Gate News 消息,Jump Trading 周一反击针对其的 40 亿美元诉讼,此前 Terraform Labs 破产重组负责人 Todd Snyder 指控 Jump 及多家子公司与高管操纵市场、欺诈投资者并进行自我交易。Jump 表示,这起诉讼是明显企图,将 Terraform 对美国证券交易委员会(SEC)44 亿美元罚款和债务责任转嫁到自己身上。 Terraform Labs 是加密货币历史上臭名昭著的项目,其 Terra 区块链及稳定币 UST 和代币 LUNA 在 2022 年崩盘,引发 FTX 破产及监管严查,加上创始人 Do Kwon 被判 15 年监禁,总计造成投资者约 400 亿美元损失。Snyder 的诉讼指出,Jump 高管在 Terraform 实施欺诈过程中涉嫌协助,但至今未受惩罚,因此请求 40 亿美元赔偿。 诉讼书中提到,欺诈行为始于 2021 年 UST 与美元失去挂钩。Jump 曾介入买入大量 UST 试图维持挂钩,但未向投资者公开其操作。Jump 在回应中指出,诉讼未明确各被告具体行为,也未说明违法行为发生地点,并且部分指控已过诉讼时效,因此应被驳回。 此外,Snyder 近期也起诉 Jane Street 及其联合创始人 Robert Granieri 等人,指控其利用内幕信息获利。Jane Street 强调,该诉讼毫无根据,并将坚决维护自身权益。综合来看,Jump Trading 与高频交易公司纷纷回应大型加密诉讼事件,再次引发市场对机构交易与加密市场风险的关注。

2026-03-18 11:18

Gate 理财板块上线 XAUT 双币投资,多业务板块同步支持黄金代币交易

Gate News 消息,3 月 18 日,Gate 理财板块正式上线 XAUT(Tether Gold)双币投资产品。XAUT 为锚定实物黄金的加密资产,用户可基于对金价走势的判断,通过"低价买入"或"高价卖出"策略获取收益,并在持有期间赚取浮动利息。根据产品规则,用户在"低价买入"策略中投入 USDT,若结算价低于挂钩价,将按目标价格买入 XAUT,并在期间获得利息收益;在"高价卖出"策略中投入 XAUT,若结算价高于挂钩价,则按目标价格卖出 XAUT,并在持有期间获得相应利息回报。目前,Gate 已在现货、合约、ETF、理财及交易机器人等多个业务板块支持 XAUT 交易与策略场景。同时,Gate TradFi 专区亦覆盖黄金相关标的,进一步拓展数字资产与传统资产之间的联动交易能力。

Hot Posts su Public Service Enterprise Group / PSEG (PEG)

MrFlower_XingChen

MrFlower_XingChen

26 minuti fa
#GatePreIPOsLaunchesWithSpaceX Gate’s Pre-IPO Exposure to SpaceX: A Structural Shift in Private Market Access, Risk Architecture, and Retail Financialization The introduction of pre-IPO exposure products tied to high-profile private companies such as SpaceX through platforms like Gate represents a deeper transformation in how modern financial markets are evolving beyond traditional equity structures. Historically, access to companies before IPO was tightly controlled by institutional capital—venture capital firms, private equity funds, sovereign wealth funds, and select high-net-worth investors who could participate in funding rounds long before public listing. Retail investors were structurally excluded not only due to regulatory frameworks but also due to the complexity and illiquidity of private markets. What is now emerging is a hybrid financial model where blockchain infrastructure, derivative structuring, and tokenization mechanisms are being combined to simulate exposure to these previously inaccessible assets, effectively reshaping the boundary between public speculation and private valuation narratives. At the center of this development is a fundamental distinction that is often misunderstood: these instruments do not represent equity ownership in companies like SpaceX. Instead, they typically function as synthetic or derivative-linked representations that mirror perceived valuation movements without conferring shareholder rights. This means investors are not gaining legal ownership, voting rights, dividend entitlement, or direct claims on corporate assets. Instead, they are engaging with a pricing mechanism designed to track sentiment-driven or reference-based valuations of a private entity. The implication is significant because it transforms what appears to be “investment access” into a structured exposure product whose performance depends heavily on how accurately and consistently the underlying reference value is modeled and maintained by the issuing platform. When platforms such as Gate.io introduce such instruments, they are effectively building a layered financial abstraction. The first layer is the reference asset itself (a private company valuation), the second layer is the derivative or tokenized wrapper that attempts to mirror that valuation, and the third layer is the exchange infrastructure that enables trading, liquidity provision, and price discovery. Each of these layers introduces its own form of systemic dependency. For example, if the valuation reference becomes outdated, inconsistent, or based on opaque funding rounds, the derivative layer inherits that uncertainty. If the exchange’s internal liquidity pools are thin or dominated by retail sentiment cycles, price movements may diverge significantly from any real-world valuation changes. This multi-layer structure creates a system where pricing integrity is not anchored in continuous market discovery, but rather in interpretive and sometimes algorithmic estimations of value. A key risk dimension in this model is counterparty exposure, which becomes more pronounced than in traditional equity investing. In a public stock market, ownership is direct and legally enforceable through regulated clearing systems. In synthetic pre-IPO exposure models, however, investors are dependent on the issuing platform’s ability to maintain solvency, enforce redemption logic, and uphold the peg or tracking mechanism between token and reference value. This introduces structural fragility because the investor’s confidence is no longer just in the asset itself, but also in the intermediary’s operational integrity, custody practices, and internal risk management systems. If any of these components weaken, the perceived linkage between token price and underlying valuation can degrade rapidly. Liquidity is another structural constraint that often becomes visible only during periods of market stress. Unlike public equities, where liquidity is supported by deep order books and external market participants across multiple venues, tokenized private exposure products often rely on internalized liquidity pools or platform-specific matching systems. This means exit opportunities are contingent on other participants’ willingness to enter the same exposure at similar pricing levels. In bullish sentiment environments, this can create rapid inflows and exaggerated upward price movements. However, in risk-off environments, liquidity can contract quickly, leading to slippage, widening spreads, or even temporary trading restrictions. This asymmetry is not accidental—it is inherent to the architecture of closed-loop financial ecosystems. Beyond mechanics, there is a broader narrative force driving demand for such instruments. Companies like SpaceX carry enormous symbolic and speculative weight in modern markets. With its dominance in reusable rocket technology, satellite internet infrastructure via Starlink, and long-term aspirations in interplanetary transport, SpaceX functions not only as a private aerospace company but also as a proxy for frontier technological optimism. Retail investors are increasingly drawn to assets that represent future-oriented narratives rather than current cash flows, and tokenized exposure products capitalize on this behavioral shift. In this sense, the financial product is not merely a reflection of value—it is also a packaging of belief, expectation, and technological imagination. However, this convergence of narrative and financial engineering raises important regulatory and informational concerns. In many jurisdictions, instruments that replicate exposure to private assets without granting ownership rights may fall into ambiguous categories that challenge existing securities laws. The core issue is disclosure: retail investors may not fully understand the difference between holding equity in a company and holding a synthetic representation of its perceived valuation. This gap between perception and legal reality can create mismatched expectations, particularly when marketing language emphasizes “access” or “pre-IPO participation” without clearly delineating structural limitations. Regulators typically focus on investor protection, ensuring that financial products do not obscure risk through complexity or ambiguity, and this is precisely where tokenized private exposure products may face scrutiny. From a macro-financial perspective, the rise of such instruments signals a broader trend toward the financialization of illiquid and private assets. As blockchain infrastructure matures, almost any asset class—real estate, private equity, commodities, or even future revenue streams—can theoretically be converted into tradable digital instruments. This creates a parallel market ecosystem where valuation is increasingly driven by synthetic replication rather than direct ownership. While this can enhance accessibility and democratization, it also introduces the risk of fragmentation, where multiple representations of the same underlying value coexist without unified pricing standards. Ultimately, the significance of Gate’s move is not limited to a single product or a single company exposure. It reflects a structural shift in how markets define access, ownership, and value transmission in the digital era. The boundary between public and private markets is becoming increasingly porous, but that permeability does not eliminate the fundamental principles of risk, liquidity constraints, and legal enforceability. The critical insight remains consistent across all iterations of these products: access can be engineered, but ownership cannot be simulated without consequence, and narrative strength does not neutralize structural financial risk. $BTC ‌$GT ‌
1
3
0
0
SelfRugger

SelfRugger

1 ore fa
Does Palantir Technologies (PLTR) Still Justify Its Valuation After Recent Share Price Swings? ============================================================================================== Simply Wall St Wed, February 18, 2026 at 5:06 AM GMT+9 6 min read In this article: * StockStory Top Pick PLTR +1.24% Never miss an important update on your stock portfolio and cut through the noise. Over 7 million investors trust Simply Wall St to stay informed where it matters for FREE. * If you are wondering whether Palantir Technologies at US$131.41 is priced for perfection or still has room to run, you are asking the right question and valuation is where that answer starts. * The stock has recently been volatile, with a 5.8% decline over the last 7 days, a 23.1% decline over 30 days and a 21.7% decline year to date, although the 1 year return is 5.4% and the 3 year return is very large. * Recent headlines have continued to focus on Palantir's role in software for government and commercial clients, as well as its position in data analytics and AI related projects. These themes often shape how investors think about growth potential and risk, which can influence sharp price moves like the ones you have seen. * Despite all the attention, Palantir currently scores 0 out of 6 on our valuation checks, meaning it is not assessed as undervalued on any of them. You can see the full breakdown in this valuation score. Next, we will look at how different valuation methods interpret this price and then finish with a more complete way to think about what the stock might be worth. Palantir Technologies scores just 0/6 on our valuation checks. See what other red flags we found in the full valuation breakdown. ### Approach 1: Palantir Technologies Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis A Discounted Cash Flow, or DCF, model takes expected future cash flows and discounts them back to today using a required rate of return, giving an estimate of what the business might be worth per share right now. For Palantir Technologies, the model uses a 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity approach based on cash flow projections. The company’s last twelve month free cash flow is about $2.11b. Analyst inputs and extrapolated figures point to projected free cash flow of $13.30b by 2030, with a full set of estimates extending out to 2035, all expressed in US$. When those projected cash flows are discounted back to the present, the DCF model arrives at an estimated intrinsic value of about $124.77 per share. Compared with the current share price of $131.41, this implies the stock is about 5.3% above the DCF estimate, so the model reads the shares as slightly expensive rather than cheap at today’s level. **Result: ABOUT RIGHT** Palantir Technologies is fairly valued according to our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF), but this can change at a moment's notice. Track the value in your watchlist or portfolio and be alerted on when to act. Story Continues PLTR Discounted Cash Flow as at Feb 2026 Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Palantir Technologies. ### Approach 2: Palantir Technologies Price vs Book For profitable companies that already have an established equity base, the price to book, or P/B, ratio can help you see how much investors are paying relative to the accounting value of net assets. It is especially useful when you want to compare businesses within the same sector on a simple, balance sheet anchored metric. Growth expectations and risk both influence what a normal or fair P/B ratio might look like. Higher expected growth or lower perceived risk can justify a higher multiple, while slower growth or higher uncertainty usually point to a lower one. Palantir Technologies is currently trading on a P/B of 42.40x. That sits far above the wider Software industry average P/B of 2.71x and also above the peer group average of 19.98x. Simply Wall St’s Fair Ratio is a proprietary estimate of what P/B you might expect for Palantir, after factoring in elements like its earnings growth profile, margins, risk characteristics, industry and market cap. This Fair Ratio is intended to be more tailored than a simple comparison to peers or an industry average, because it tries to align the multiple with the company’s specific fundamentals. With the Fair Ratio currently not available, this comparison alone suggests the stock looks expensive on a pure P/B basis. **Result: OVERVALUED** NasdaqGS:PLTR P/B Ratio as at Feb 2026 P/B ratios tell one story, but what if the real opportunity lies elsewhere? Start investing in legacies, not executives. Discover our 23 top founder-led companies. ### Upgrade Your Decision Making: Choose your Palantir Technologies Narrative Earlier we mentioned that there is an even better way to understand valuation, so let us introduce you to Narratives, which are simply your story about Palantir Technologies tied to some numbers like your fair value, revenue, earnings and margin assumptions. These are then translated into a forecast and a fair value that you can compare to today’s price, all inside an easy tool on Simply Wall St’s Community page that updates automatically when fresh news or earnings arrive. For example, one Palantir Narrative on the platform currently anchors on a fair value of about US$19.79 per share, while another reaches US$699.78 per share. That huge spread shows how different investors can look at the same company and reach very different conclusions, helping you decide whether you see Palantir as closer to the cautious end or the very optimistic end of that range. For Palantir Technologies, however, we will make it really easy for you with previews of two leading Palantir Technologies Narratives: **🐂 Palantir Technologies Bull Case** Fair value in this bullish narrative: US$699.78 per share Current price vs this fair value: about 81% below the narrative fair value Revenue growth assumption: 50% * Emphasis on Palantir’s hands on approach, with engineers deployed on site to help customers actually use the software and realise benefits. * Over 500 AIP bootcamps highlighted as a way to accelerate onboarding, user engagement and productivity for clients. * Customer feedback, such as the quote from Fabric’s founder, frames Palantir as a supportive partner that helps smaller companies scale with its Foundry platform. **🐻 Palantir Technologies Bear Case** Fair value in this cautious narrative: US$96.00 per share Current price vs this fair value: about 37% above the narrative fair value Revenue growth assumption: 26% * Points to very high valuation metrics such as P/E, P/B, PEG, EV/Revenue and EV/EBITDA, with much of the price anchored to expectations about the future rather than current earnings. * Flags several business risks including reliance on government contracts, growing competition in data analytics and AI, and regulatory or legal pressures around data use. * Highlights that broader macro conditions and changing market sentiment could matter a lot for a stock priced with high expectations, which may lead to periods of sharp volatility. Taken together, these Narratives show how reasonable investors can look at the same company and land in very different places on value and risk. Your own view on Palantir will sit somewhere along that spectrum, and tools like Narratives can help you pin down exactly where that is and how it compares with today’s price. Curious how numbers become stories that shape markets? Explore Community Narratives Do you think there's more to the story for Palantir Technologies? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying! NasdaqGS:PLTR 1-Year Stock Price Chart _ This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. **We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice.** It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned._ _Companies discussed in this article include PLTR._ **Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly.**_ Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com_ Terms and Privacy Policy Privacy Dashboard More Info
0
0
0
0
InfraVibes

InfraVibes

3 ore fa
I've been watching TSMC closely lately, and honestly, there's a compelling case for why this semiconductor giant might be one of the better AI plays right now. Hear me out. So here's the thing about the AI boom — everyone's talking about Nvidia, and sure, they're crushing it. But what people sometimes miss is that someone has to actually manufacture all those chips. That's where TSMC comes in. They're the world's leading foundry, and they're basically the only company that can build high-end chips at the scale and speed the market demands right now. The numbers tell the story. By Q3, TSMC was sitting on roughly 72% of the global foundry market by revenue. Their closest competitor, Samsung, had just 7%. What's wild is that despite the AI investment cycle flooding the market, TSMC actually increased its share from around 65% mid-2024. That's not luck — it's because chip companies have nowhere else to go. The money's too big, the stakes too high. Nvidia's been their anchor tenant, and that relationship just got more interesting. Nvidia's next-gen Rubin architecture is coming in 2026, and TSMC is building it on their advanced 3-nanometer process. Meanwhile, Nvidia's sitting on a $500 billion order backlog. That's a massive tailwind for TSMC's foundry business as those orders flow through. Here's where it gets interesting from a valuation angle. TSMC's trading at roughly 30x 2025 earnings, which might sound pricey. But analysts are modeling nearly 29% annual earnings growth over the next three to five years. Using the PEG ratio — which compares growth to valuation — TSMC's sitting at around 1, which signals the stock is actually attractive. I'm usually comfortable paying up to 2 or 2.5 for quality semiconductor plays, and TSMC is definitely that. The way I see it, TSMC has a pretty high floor because of how critical they are to the AI infrastructure buildout. Even if growth comes in a bit softer than expected, the long-term returns look solid. The semiconductor industry isn't going anywhere, and TSMC's dominance in the AI chip manufacturing space gives them a structural advantage that's hard to replicate. Worth keeping on your radar if you're thinking about AI exposure beyond just the chip designers.
0
0
0
0