LYFT

Prezzo Lyft Inc

LYFT
$14,98
+$0,18(+1,21%)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-17 13:41 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-17 13:41, Lyft Inc (LYFT) is priced at $14,98, with a total market cap of $5,87B, a P/E ratio of 2,79, and a dividend yield of 0,00%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $14,77 and $15,03. The current price is 1,42% above the day's low and 0,33% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 11,58M. Over the past 52 weeks, LYFT has traded between $12,30 to $25,54, and the current price is -41,34% away from the 52-week high.

LYFT Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$14,66
Market Cap$5,87B
Volume11,58M
P/E Ratio2,79
Dividend Yield (TTM)0,00%
Diluted EPS (TTM)6,92
Net Income (FY)$2,84B
Revenue (FY)$6,31B
Earnings Date2026-05-14
EPS Estimate0,30
Revenue Estimate$1,63B
Shares Outstanding400,98M
Beta (1Y)1.859

About LYFT

Lyft, Inc. operates a peer-to-peer marketplace for on-demand ridesharing in the United States and Canada. The company operates multimodal transportation networks that offer riders personalized and on-demand access to various mobility options. It provides Ridesharing Marketplace, which connects drivers with riders; Express Drive, a flexible car rentals program for drivers; Lyft Rentals that provides vehicles for long-distance trips; and a network of shared bikes and scooters in various cities to address the needs of riders for short trips. The company also integrates third-party public transit data into the Lyft app to offer riders various transportation options. In addition, it offers access to autonomous vehicles; centralized tools and enterprise transportation solutions, such as concierge transportation solutions for organizations; Lyft Pink subscription plans; Lyft Pass commuter programs; first-mile and last-mile services; and university safe rides programs. The company was formerly known as Zimride, Inc. and changed its name to Lyft, Inc. in April 2013. Lyft, Inc. was incorporated in 2007 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
SectorTechnology
IndustrySoftware - Application
CEOJohn David Risher
HeadquartersSan Francisco,CA,US
Official Websitehttps://www.lyft.com
Employees (FY)3,91K
Average Revenue (1Y)$1,61M
Net Income per Employee$726,81K

Lyft Inc (LYFT) FAQ

What's the stock price of Lyft Inc (LYFT) today?

x
Lyft Inc (LYFT) is currently trading at $14,98, with a 24h change of +1,21%. The 52-week trading range is $12,30–$25,54.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Lyft Inc (LYFT)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Lyft Inc (LYFT)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Lyft Inc (LYFT)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Lyft Inc (LYFT)?

x

Should you buy or sell Lyft Inc (LYFT) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Lyft Inc (LYFT)?

x

How to buy Lyft Inc (LYFT) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Hot Posts su Lyft Inc (LYFT)

SelfRugger

SelfRugger

34 minuti fa
Climactic launches hybrid fund to get startups through the ‘valley of death’ ============================================================================ Tim De Chant Wed, February 18, 2026 at 3:57 AM GMT+9 3 min read In this article: * StockStory Top Pick LYFT +0.83% * UBER +0.60% Image Credits:Getty Images It’s a challenge every startup faces: they’ve made a prototype and proven the thing works, but now have to sell the product and produce enough to get past the “valley of death” that kills so many companies. “They are chicken and egg stuck,” Josh Felser, co-founder and managing partner of early-stage venture firm Climactic, told TechCrunch. The hurdle is particularly high for companies making physical goods. Felser noticed it was a common occurrence among startups producing novel materials. Fesler, who previously founded and invested in software startups, said the problem they faced seemed a bit unfair. “Software companies sell at a negative margin all the time in the beginning, you know, Uber, Lyft, you can look at lots of different examples,” he said. “But for materials companies, they they’re not allowed to do that. One of the questions I had is, ‘why is that?'” Felser found that unlike software companies, which can quickly add more capacity from cloud service providers, materials startups face a market skeptical of their ability to scale up production without a guaranteed customer. Felser decided to give them one. Felser doesn’t run a company with a big budget for clever materials, but he knows a few. And as a climate tech investor, he knows more than a few startups that could benefit from a well-known customer. Felser has been quietly working on a new project, called Material Scale, that brings the two sides together using a hybrid debt-equity investment vehicle to give materials startups a boost, TechCrunch has learned. Material Scale will initially focus on climate tech startups in the apparel industry. Material Scale is betting on startups with commercial-ready products that are ready to scale if a customer can purchase in bulk. Buyers will commit enough funds to cover the cost of the material at market price. Material Scale will fund the difference through a combination of loans and warrants in the startup. “It’s really minimally dilutive,” Felser said. Ralph Lauren is joining the platform as a buyer for the initial launch of Material Scale. Investor Structure Climate is joining Climactic as a general partner. Money from purchase orders flows from the buyer through Material Scale to the startup. “In effect, we buy it and then simultaneously sell it,” Felser said. The deals between Material Scale and the buyer and between Material Scale and the startup will be inked essentially at the same time. “Once they sign the deals, this’ll be interesting because the value of the company has significantly changed because they’ve now got a buyer and they’ve got funding to achieve scale,” he said. Story Continues Material Scale hasn’t executed any deals yet; Felser said he has large apparel manufacturers interested in participating and a long roster of startups that could use the funding. “The startups all want it,” he said. “We have a big list of companies that are candidates that we’re talking with.” The first investments will come out of a special purpose vehicle totaling about $11 million. Felser hopes to eventually branch out into other, similar markets like alternative fuels, eventually growing the Material Scale concept to nine figures. He hopes other investors will steal his idea. “We need more novel instruments like this to attack climate change,” he said. “We want to be nimble and be able to take advantage of opportunities when we we see them and not just be doing the same old thing.” Terms and Privacy Policy Privacy Dashboard More Info
0
0
0
0
digital_archaeologist

digital_archaeologist

9 ore fa
I've been looking into how Mary Barra shaped General Motors over the past decade, and honestly, her quotes reveal a lot about where she thinks the auto industry is heading. Since taking the helm in 2014, this CEO has basically rewired how one of the oldest manufacturers operates. Let's start with autonomous vehicles. Barra was early in recognizing that self-driving cars would be huge, and she made sure GM positioned itself as a leader rather than a follower. The company's Cruise Automation unit in San Francisco became central to that strategy, and Barra understood that having access to Bay Area talent was critical. Super Cruise, their hands-free highway system, showed they weren't just talking about the future—they were building it. What struck me about Mary Barra's approach to connectivity is that she didn't treat in-vehicle tech as an afterthought. OnStar gave GM an early advantage, but Barra pushed the company to keep evolving. Drivers wanted seamless voice and data access, streaming capabilities, entertainment options. She got that the driving experience needed to be both practical and engaging, not one or the other. The ride-sharing thing is interesting too. Instead of fighting Uber and Lyft like dinosaurs, GM partnered with Lyft. Barra's thinking here was smart: adapt to changing consumer behavior rather than resist it. That partnership mindset shows how she views disruption—not as a threat to bury, but as a trend to shape. When discussing her role as the first woman leading a major automaker, Barra's quotes were refreshingly direct. She didn't want to be defined by that distinction alone. Instead, she pushed back against the idea that women need to choose between ambition and personal life early on. Her message was essentially: stay open to opportunities, don't self-select out of the fast track prematurely. Maybe the most revealing Mary Barra quotes are about GM's broader leadership philosophy. While many legacy players dig in and defend their turf when industries shift, Barra chose to lean into change. She wanted GM to stay ahead of innovation, not get left behind by it. That's the mindset that separates industry leaders from followers. Looking back at her tenure, Barra's strategic insights have held up pretty well. The auto industry has indeed transformed around autonomous vehicles, connectivity, and new mobility models. Whether you're tracking GM's stock or just interested in how established companies stay relevant, her approach to leading through disruption is worth paying attention to.
0
0
0
0
Sweep1

Sweep1

13 ore fa
Some Uber drivers made FIVE FIGURES a week without ever driving They would sign up for Uber and Lyft, accept a ride, and never move The passenger waits for a long time, eventually gets frustrated and cancels The cancellation fee hits the driver’s account instantly and he goes on to do the same thing again One phone pulls a few hundred dollars a day doing absolutely nothing But the real masterminds behind these scandals didn’t stop at one phone They’d register multiple accounts using different names, different documents, different vehicles… Run them all from a single apartment. Laptops open, phones lined up on a desk, every account cycling rides simultaneously Uber pays up to $10 every time a passenger gives up and clicks cancel At scale that math gets stupid fast Ten accounts running 30 cancellations a day each is $3,000 daily. From a couch! Airport queues were the sweet spot. Passengers landing at JFK or LAX have no patience. They need to move When their driver doesn’t show in three minutes they cancel and rebook immediately The fake driver doesn’t care. Another request is already waiting Parking lots near airports started filling up with cars that never moved Some operators didn’t even own the cars, they’d rent the cheapest vehicles on Turo just to have a plate tied to an active account Uber eventually caught on through GPS data. Accounts that accepted hundreds of rides but never logged meaningful mileage got flagged and banned But by the time enforcement hit, the early operators had already cashed out five and six figures and moved on to the next platform exploit The playbook was dead simple. Accept. Wait. Collect. Repeat.
2
0
0
0