Acquista Criptovalute
Paga con
USD
USD
Buy & Sell
Hot
Supports Visa, MasterCard, SEPA & more
P2P
0 Fees
Flexible trading, zero fees
Gate Card
Use your crypto for payments worldwide
Mercati
Trading
Basic
Advanced
Futures
Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Opzioni
Hot
Trade European-style Vanilla Options
Conto unificato
Massimizza l'efficienza del tuo capitale
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Guadagna
Lancia
CandyDrop
Raccogli le caramelle per guadagnare airdrop
Launchpool
Staking rapido, guadagna potenziali nuovi token
HODLer Airdrop
Fai holding GT e ottieni enormi airdrop gratuitamente
Pre-IPOs
tag
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investimento
Square
Square
Post, share, and explore crypto trends
Live
moments live
Live crypto market analysis
Chat
Chat with crypto traders
News
What is happening in crypto
flower_head
Altro
Promozioni
AI
Altro
TradFi
WCTC S8
Rewards
MET

Prezzo Metlife Inc

MET
$78,23
+$1,14(+1,47%)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-17 17:29 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-17 17:29, Metlife Inc (MET) is priced at $78,23, with a total market cap of $50,79B, a P/E ratio of 15,53, and a dividend yield of 2,94%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $77,44 and $78,60. The current price is 1,02% above the day's low and 0,47% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 2,21M. Over the past 52 weeks, MET has traded between $67,60 to $78,60, and the current price is -0,47% away from the 52-week high.

MET Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$77,52
Market Cap$50,79B
Volume2,21M
P/E Ratio15,53
Dividend Yield (TTM)2,94%
Dividend Amount$0,56
Diluted EPS (TTM)5,08
Net Income (FY)$3,37B
Revenue (FY)$77,08B
Earnings Date2026-05-06
EPS Estimate2,21
Revenue Estimate$19,45B
Shares Outstanding655,23M
Beta (1Y)0.733
Ex-Dividend Date2026-02-03
Dividend Payment Date2026-03-10

About MET

MetLife, Inc., a financial services company, provides insurance, annuities, employee benefits, and asset management services worldwide. It operates through five segments: U.S.; Asia; Latin America; Europe, the Middle East and Africa; and MetLife Holdings. The company offers life, dental, group short-and long-term disability, individual disability, pet insurance, accidental death and dismemberment, vision, and accident and health coverages, as well as prepaid legal plans; administrative services-only arrangements to employers; and general and separate account, and synthetic guaranteed interest contracts, as well as private floating rate funding agreements. It also provides pension risk transfers, institutional income annuities, structured settlements, and capital markets investment products; and other products and services, such as life insurance products and funding agreements for funding postretirement benefits, as well as company, bank, or trust-owned life insurance used to finance nonqualified benefit programs for executives. In addition, it provides fixed, indexed-linked, and variable annuities; and pension products; regular savings products; whole and term life, endowments, universal and variable life, and group life products; longevity reinsurance solutions; credit insurance products; and protection against long-term health care services. MetLife, Inc. was founded in 1863 and is headquartered in New York, New York.
SectorFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - Life
CEOMichel Abbas Khalaf
HeadquartersNew York City,NY,US
Official Websitehttps://www.metlife.com
Employees (FY)46,00K
Average Revenue (1Y)$1,67M
Net Income per Employee$73,45K

Metlife Inc (MET) FAQ

What's the stock price of Metlife Inc (MET) today?

x
Metlife Inc (MET) is currently trading at $78,23, with a 24h change of +1,47%. The 52-week trading range is $67,60–$78,60.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Metlife Inc (MET)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Metlife Inc (MET)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Metlife Inc (MET)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Metlife Inc (MET)?

x

Should you buy or sell Metlife Inc (MET) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Metlife Inc (MET)?

x

How to buy Metlife Inc (MET) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

MET
CFD
Fai trading

Metlife Inc (MET) Latest News

2026-04-02 02:41

Meteora：与 Drift 协议无任何交互，平台资金安全

Gate News 消息，4 月 2 日，Solana 流动性协议 Meteora 发布声明表示，Meteora 上所有资金均安全，平台所有功能及金库均未与 Drift 协议交互。

2026-03-26 01:45

DeFi 2025 年链上收益达 80 亿美元，AMM 手续费贡献超半

Gate News 消息，3 月 26 日，据研究员 Vadym 分析，DeFi 于 2025 年产生约 80 亿美元链上收益。其中，AMM 交易手续费为最大收益来源，约 42 亿美元，Uniswap、Meteora 及 Raydium 合计占比 62%。借贷利息位居第二，约 17.6 亿美元，Aave、Morpho 等货币市场贡献超 DeFi 总 TVL 的 60%，但约半数借贷需求属循环杠杆操作。RWA 贡献 6 至 9 亿美元，美国国债占 RWA 市场约 41%。永续合约资金费率贡献约 3 亿美元，主要来自 Ethena。数据显示，以太坊生态中逾半稳定币存款收益低于美国国债利率，保险承保、链上期权等潜在收益来源仍未充分开发。以 Sky（前身 MakerDAO）为例，其约 70% 收入源自链下资产，反映 TradFi 收益正通过许可渠道加速流入 DeFi。

2026-03-03 00:20

Pump.fun移动端已支持在竞对平台上发行的代币及其他非原生资产

PANews 3月3日消息，据The Block报道，Solana生态Meme币发行平台Pump.fun宣布通过其移动应用新增对竞争对手平台发行的代币及其他非原生资产的支持。用户现可交易基于Solana的其他代币发行平台如Raydium和Meteora上发行的代币，以及通过Wormhole桥接的封装比特币和封装以太坊，还有Gigachad和PENGU等成熟代币。Pump.fun表示，此举旨在降低交易摩擦，让用户无需离开App即可主导链上操作。

2026-02-26 07:29

Anonymous Trader Bets $50.7K on Axiom Insider Trading Accusation at 15.1% Odds

Gate News bot message, an anonymous trader utilized a new wallet to place a $50.7K bet predicting Axiom would be accused of insider trading by @zachxbt, with odds standing at only 15.1%. This action sparked speculation regarding potential inside information. Following this bet, numerous traders joined in, driving Axiom's odds higher than Meteora's.

Hot Posts su Metlife Inc (MET)

SoominStar

SoominStar

1 ore fa
#GatePreIPOsLaunchesWithSpaceX The idea of pre-IPO access has always carried a certain aura in financial markets — a quiet advantage reserved for insiders, venture capitalists, and institutions that move early while the public waits at the gates. Now, with Gate stepping into the pre-IPO space and tying that narrative to a name as powerful as SpaceX, the conversation shifts from exclusivity to accessibility. This is not just another product launch; it feels like a deliberate attempt to blur the line between traditional equity markets and the rapidly evolving crypto ecosystem. From my perspective, what makes this particularly interesting is not just the headline — “SpaceX pre-IPO exposure” — but the underlying psychological shift it creates among retail participants. For years, crypto traders have operated in a high-volatility, high-liquidity environment where opportunities appear and disappear within hours. Pre-IPO markets, on the other hand, have historically been slow, opaque, and gated. Bringing these two worlds together creates a hybrid model where patience meets speculation, and that combination has serious implications. The association with SpaceX adds another layer entirely. SpaceX is not just a company; it represents innovation, ambition, and a long-term vision that goes beyond quarterly earnings. When a crypto platform introduces access to something tied to that narrative, it’s not just offering a financial instrument — it’s selling participation in a story. And markets, more often than not, are driven by stories before they are driven by numbers. What I find compelling here is how this move reflects a broader trend: the tokenization of real-world assets. For a long time, this concept has been discussed in theory — real estate on-chain, stocks on-chain, even commodities. But practical execution has always lagged behind the idea. Gate’s approach suggests that the infrastructure is finally catching up. If pre-IPO equities can be represented, traded, and accessed in a crypto-native environment, then the barriers between asset classes begin to dissolve. At the same time, this raises an important question about valuation perception. Crypto traders are used to pricing assets based on momentum, narrative strength, and liquidity flows rather than traditional financial metrics. When something like a pre-IPO SpaceX exposure enters this ecosystem, how will it be valued? Will it follow traditional valuation models, or will it absorb the speculative behavior of crypto markets? My view leans toward the latter, at least in the early stages. Liquidity tends to reshape how assets behave, and crypto liquidity is uniquely aggressive. Another angle worth considering is the competitive positioning of Gate itself. In a market where exchanges are constantly trying to differentiate — through derivatives, staking products, or ecosystem incentives — introducing pre-IPO access is a strategic move. It signals a shift from being just a trading platform to becoming a broader financial gateway. And in an environment where user retention depends heavily on offering something “new,” this kind of innovation can create a strong edge. But innovation always comes with its own set of challenges. Regulatory uncertainty is one of the biggest. Pre-IPO markets are heavily regulated in traditional finance for a reason — they involve private companies, sensitive information, and controlled access. Translating that into a crypto framework is not straightforward. There will inevitably be friction between the speed of innovation and the pace of regulation. And how Gate navigates that friction will determine whether this becomes a sustainable model or just a short-term narrative spike. From a trader’s mindset, this also introduces a new kind of decision-making process. In crypto, decisions are often driven by short-term signals — technical patterns, news catalysts, whale movements. Pre-IPO exposure, especially linked to a company like SpaceX, requires a longer-term perspective. It asks traders to think beyond immediate price action and consider fundamentals, growth potential, and macro trends. That shift in thinking could be uncomfortable for some, but it also opens the door to a more mature trading approach. There’s also a social dimension to this development. Crypto has always been about democratization — giving individuals access to opportunities that were previously out of reach. Pre-IPO markets have been one of the last strongholds of exclusivity. By bringing them into the crypto space, Gate is essentially challenging that status quo. Whether it succeeds or not, the attempt itself is significant because it pushes the industry closer to its original ideals. Personally, I see this as part of a larger evolution rather than an isolated event. The lines between crypto and traditional finance are gradually fading. We’ve already seen ETFs, institutional adoption, and regulatory frameworks begin to shape the market. Pre-IPO access is another step in that direction. It’s a signal that crypto is not just about creating new assets anymore — it’s about redefining how all assets are accessed and traded. However, it’s important not to get carried away by the hype alone. The success of such a product depends on execution — liquidity depth, transparency, pricing mechanisms, and user trust. If any of these elements fall short, the narrative can quickly lose momentum. Markets are unforgiving when expectations are not met, especially in a space as fast-moving as crypto. One thing that stands out to me is how this could influence user behavior on a broader scale. If traders begin to allocate a portion of their capital to pre-IPO opportunities, it could reduce some of the extreme volatility seen in purely speculative tokens. In a way, it introduces a stabilizing factor — assets that are tied to real-world companies with long-term growth trajectories. That doesn’t eliminate volatility, but it changes its nature. At the same time, there’s a potential feedback loop here. If pre-IPO assets gain traction within crypto platforms, it could encourage more companies to explore tokenized offerings as a way to access global liquidity. That, in turn, could accelerate the integration of blockchain technology into traditional finance. It’s a chain reaction that starts with a single initiative but has far-reaching implications. Looking at the bigger picture, this move also reflects the growing confidence of crypto platforms in expanding beyond their original scope. A few years ago, the focus was purely on surviving market cycles and building user bases. Now, the focus is shifting toward innovation, diversification, and long-term positioning. Gate’s pre-IPO launch fits perfectly into that narrative. What I appreciate most about this development is the balance it tries to strike between ambition and practicality. It’s ambitious because it challenges established financial structures. But it’s also practical because it leverages existing market demand — the desire for early access to high-growth companies. That combination increases the chances of adoption, even if the journey is not entirely smooth. From my own perspective, this is the kind of evolution that keeps the crypto space interesting. It’s not just about price movements anymore; it’s about how the entire financial landscape is being reshaped. Each new product, each new idea adds another layer to that transformation. And while not every experiment will succeed, the ones that do will redefine what we consider “normal” in finance. In the end, the real impact of Gate’s pre-IPO launch with SpaceX won’t be measured by initial hype or short-term trading volumes. It will be measured by how it changes user expectations. If people start to see crypto platforms as gateways to all kinds of financial opportunities — not just tokens — then this move will have achieved something much bigger than a successful product launch. And honestly, that’s where things get exciting. Because once expectations change, the entire industry has to evolve to meet them. 🚀
0
0
0
0
Crypto_Beauty

Crypto_Beauty

1 ore fa
#美伊局势和谈与增兵博弈 The Big Picture: What Is Actually Happening Between the US and Iran? This is not just diplomatic noise. There is an **active war** in progress. Here is the timeline in plain terms: - **Late February 2026:** The US-Israel military conflict with Iran formally broke out. - **March 2026:** US and Israeli strikes hit Iranian nuclear facilities including Natanz. Iran retaliated by blockading the Strait of Hormuz — the chokepoint through which roughly 20% of global oil flows. Oil prices spiked hard. - **Early April 2026:** A fragile, Pakistan-brokered **two-week ceasefire** was reached. Mediators from Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey are actively shuttling between both sides. - **April 11, 2026:** Senior US and Iranian delegations met in Islamabad for formal talks. The agenda included uranium enrichment limits, sanctions relief, Strait of Hormuz control, Lebanon ceasefire scope, war reparations, and US troop withdrawal from the region. - **April 13, 2026:** Talks in Islamabad **collapsed without a deal.** The core sticking point: The US demanded Iran freeze uranium enrichment for **20 years.** Iran proposed only **5 years.** Netanyahu confirmed the US also wants all enriched uranium removed from Iranian soil entirely. - **April 15, 2026:** Despite the collapse, Trump publicly stated Iran "still wants a deal," which alone was enough to push the S&P 500 to a **fresh all-time high at 7,022.95** — fully recovering all war-related losses. - **Right now (April 16):** The ceasefire deadline is **April 21.** Mediators are still working. No deal yet. The Pentagon meanwhile has been moving warships into the region and building troop strength. 1: Will the US and Iran Compromise on Uranium Enrichment, or Will Conflict Escalate? This is genuinely one of the hardest geopolitical questions of 2026. Here is how to think about both sides: **The case for a deal (compromise):** - Iran's economy is under severe stress. The naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is squeezing its oil revenues and its ability to fund Hezbollah and other regional proxies. - Iran has reportedly **softened several maximalist demands** from its original 10-point proposal — including on nuclear enrichment levels, US troop withdrawal timeline, and war reparations amounts. That is a significant shift. - The mediator coalition (Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey) is genuinely active and has credibility with both sides. - Trump has repeatedly said he is "very optimistic" about a deal — and historically, Trump responds well to economic deal-making frameworks. If Iran frames concessions as an economic exchange (sanctions relief for enrichment pause), it fits Trump's negotiating style. - Iran currently holds roughly **440 kg of uranium enriched to 60%** — enough theoretically for over 10 warheads if taken to 90%. The US and Israel cannot let that sit indefinitely. Both sides have a security incentive to settle. **The case for escalation:** - The gap between a **20-year US demand** and a **5-year Iranian offer** is enormous — not just a number, but a philosophical difference about sovereignty and recognition. - Iran insists uranium enrichment is a sovereign right and non-negotiable in principle. Domestically, Iranian hardliners would view full surrender on enrichment as a humiliation. - Israel is a wildcard. Netanyahu's government has explicitly said their "mission isn't over until the regime falls." Israel is not a party to these talks and has every incentive to disrupt a deal it views as insufficient. - The US simultaneously began a **naval blockade of Iran** while talking peace — that is a pressure tactic, but it also raises the risk of an accidental incident triggering re-escalation. - The ceasefire does **not currently include Lebanon** according to the US and Israel, but Iran insists it does. This unresolved scope issue could blow up the framework entirely. **Bottom line on Q1:** The most likely near-term outcome is a **short-term extension of the ceasefire past April 21**, not a comprehensive deal. A full uranium enrichment agreement remains far off. The probability of full war resumption is real but not the base case — both sides have economic pain from continued conflict. Expect continued **strategic ambiguity**, not resolution, for weeks or months ahead. --- ## Question 2: If Peace Talks Succeed — Is It "Buy the Rumor, Sell the News" or a Continued Uptrend? The market has already done something remarkable here: the **S&P 500 hit a new all-time high while an active war is still ongoing.** That tells you the market is pricing in a **high probability of a deal** — not certainty, but strong hope. **What "buy the rumor, sell the news" looks like:** - The S&P 500 rose -10% over just 10 trading sessions on peace talk sentiment alone. - Oil is still above $90 per barrel — well above pre-war levels. A ceasefire deal would likely push oil back toward $70-75, which is **good for stocks** (lower inflation, lower rate pressure). So the first leg of the post-deal reaction could still be bullish. - However, once the initial euphoria fades, the market may realize: the structural geopolitical risk hasn't disappeared, Iran's nuclear program still exists, and the underlying economic damage from weeks of supply disruption doesn't vanish overnight. **What a continuation uptrend looks like:** - If peace is confirmed AND the Strait of Hormuz reopens AND oil normalizes, you get a genuine macro tailwind: inflation pressure eases, the Fed can stay accommodative or cut, and corporate earnings improve. - Crypto in particular tends to benefit from a "risk-on" macro environment. BTC is currently trading around **$74,765** — up about +2.5% over the past 7 days and +5% over 30 days. The 4-hour chart shows a healthy bullish structure with MA7 above MA30 above MA120. ETF inflows have been consistently positive: Bitcoin ETFs saw +5,538 BTC (+$411M) inflow on April 14 alone, and ETH ETFs added +28,618 ETH on April 15. - The Fear and Greed index sits at **23** — still in "Fear" territory — meaning there is significant room for sentiment to improve further if geopolitical risk resolves. **The honest answer on Q2:** A confirmed deal likely produces a **short-term spike followed by a pullback** (sell-the-news rotation), then potentially a **sustained uptrend over months** if the macro backdrop genuinely improves. The risk is that a "deal" turns out to be a ceasefire extension rather than a full settlement — in which case the rally would be fragile and vulnerable to the next escalation headline. The S&P rally right now is, as Bloomberg's own analysts put it, "built on hope" — and hope priced into markets is always vulnerable. 3: How Should You Allocate Assets During This Volatile Period? This is the most practical question. Here is a structured framework, not a one-size-fits-all prescription: **Step 1 — Understand what kind of volatility this is** This is **geopolitical volatility**, not a structural economic crisis. The difference matters. In geopolitical shocks, markets tend to overshoot on fear and then recover once the worst-case scenario doesn't materialize. That pattern is exactly what played out here — sharp drop in March, 10% recovery in April on talk of negotiations. **Step 2 — The Core Principle: Don't be fully in, don't be fully out** Going 100% cash means you miss the recovery (which already happened). Going 100% risk-on means one bad headline on April 17 or 21 wipes a chunk of recent gains. Staged positioning is the rational approach. **Step 3 — Asset class thinking for this specific environment** | Asset | Reasoning | |---|---| | **BTC** | Currently -$74,765, +2.5% weekly, bullish 4H structure, strong ETF inflows. Acts as both a risk asset and a macro hedge. Peace deal = positive. But short-term overbought signals on the daily chart (CCI and WR both in overbought zones) suggest **don't chase here** — wait for a pullback toward the $71,000-$72,000 range. | | **ETH** | -$2,342, up +4.3% weekly. ETF inflows positive. BitMine now holds 4% of total ETH supply, which is a structural demand floor. Running slightly behind BTC on the 24H basis. Technically similar setup — bullish 4H but overbought signals on daily. | | **Gold / TradFi** | Oil above $90 and inflation fears = traditionally good for gold. If you want to hedge against the scenario where talks collapse, gold or oil exposure is relevant. Gate TradFi gives you direct access to XAUUSD (gold) and other traditional assets from within the same platform — worth considering for portfolio balance during war-risk periods. | | **Stablecoins (USDT/USDC)** | Keeping 20-30% in stablecoins right now is not cowardice — it is optionality. If April 21 brings bad news, you have dry powder to buy the dip at better levels. If it brings good news, you didn't miss much since you hold some risk assets too. | | **High-volatility altcoins** | This is not the environment to go speculative-heavy. Geopolitical uncertainty punishes thin-liquidity assets disproportionately. If you hold altcoins, consider trimming to core positions and rotating into BTC/ETH for the duration of the uncertainty. | **Step 4 — Watch these specific dates** - **April 21**: Ceasefire deadline. The single most important near-term catalyst. If a new deal or extension is announced, expect another risk-on spike. If talks break down, prepare for a sharp reversal. - **Federal Reserve signals**: With oil at $90+, any hawkish Fed language would add a second layer of pressure on risk assets simultaneously. **Step 5 — Position sizing discipline** In high-uncertainty environments, the size of your position matters more than the direction of your bet. Even if you are confident about the direction (bullish on BTC long-term), oversized leverage during a ceasefire deadline week is gambling, not investing. Summary | Question | Short Answer | |---|---| | Q1: Compromise or escalate? | Most likely a ceasefire extension, not a full deal. Full escalation is a real tail risk but not the base case. | | Q2: Sell the news or uptrend? | Short-term spike and pullback if a deal comes, then potentially sustained uptrend if macro improves. Rally right now is "hope-based" and fragile. | | Q3: How to allocate? | Stage into risk assets (BTC/ETH), keep 20-30% in stablecoins as dry powder, use gold/TradFi as a hedge, avoid heavy altcoin or leverage exposure into April 21. None of this is financial advice — these are analytical frameworks to help you think through the situation yourself. The April 21 deadline is close enough that the next few days will tell us a great deal more. Stay nimble, size prudently, and don't let the market's "blind optimism" (as the topic itself puts it) become your blind spot.
2
0
0
2
BeautifulDay

BeautifulDay

2 ore fa
#Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana are currently moving in a market environment driven more by macro expectations than pure spot demand. Liquidity conditions remain the key driver, with traders closely watching interest rate outlooks and risk appetite across equities. Bitcoin continues to act as the primary macro indicator for the crypto market. Price action shows that momentum tends to strengthen when BTC holds above key support zones, but upside moves are still being met with profit-taking near recent highs. This suggests the market is in a distribution-accumulation phase rather than a strong trending phase. Volatility remains compressed compared to earlier cycles, indicating that a breakout move is likely forming, but direction depends on liquidity expansion. #Ethereum is following Bitcoin but with slightly weaker relative strength. ETH continues to face resistance in reclaiming leadership in the market, as rotation into higher-beta assets is inconsistent. However, network fundamentals remain stable, and any sustained BTC breakout typically triggers delayed but sharper ETH movement. For now, ETH is behaving as a confirmation asset rather than a leading one. #Solana remains the highest beta among the three, showing stronger intraday expansions and sharper pullbacks. This indicates speculative interest is still active, but also that risk management is crucial. SOL tends to outperform in bullish bursts but also retraces faster when sentiment cools. Its structure suggests it is still in a momentum-driven phase rather than a stable accumulation trend. Overall, the market is in a pre-expansion phase where compression in BTC often leads the next major directional move. ETH is waiting for confirmation, and SOL is acting as the volatility amplifier. The next decisive move across all three will likely depend on whether BTC can establish a clean breakout with sustained volume or face another rejection into range-bound conditions.
BTC+4,73%
ETH+5,40%
SOL+4,58%
4
4
0
0