SeaSaltSparklingWater

The fifth target has been achieved, arranged! Mentioning stop-loss at T2 is a very practical approach.

I've always been pretty afraid of lending and borrowing, mainly worried that I don't watch the market closely enough. When it really gets close to the liquidation line and three steps away from the red line, I usually don't try to tough it out: I first reduce my position a little, preferring to earn less and create some breathing room; then I re-calculate the collateral/loan side, rather than relying on "gut feeling." If it's still tight, I just add margin or pay back some first. Anyway, as someone who slacks off at work, I usually end up paying tuition to the market in the end...
By the way,

I'm not very good at explaining those underlying details, but every time the chain gets congested, I can feel it: sending a transaction isn't just "press and it's done," but first queuing in the mempool, like takeout orders piling up in the rider’s hands. If you offer a lower fee, you might get cut in line, left waiting, or even forget what you originally wanted to do... That's how it usually goes for me.
Recently, with a bunch of testnet incentives and points farming, everyone’s guessing whether the mainnet will issue tokens, and more activity tends to cause more congestion. Basically, when t

Seeing someone say "Just look at the address label to copy the homework," I really am a bit hesitant... Labels/clustering, they can be used, but don't treat them as gospel. An address labeled as "smart money" might just be good luck at that moment, or maybe they split one dollar into ten accounts, and the funds you see could also be people moving money from left to right. Anyway, I now trust "behavior" more: whether they keep adding positions, whether they frequently move in and out, and which pools they bounce between. Recently, with extreme funding rates, the group has been arguing whether t