Don't think of DuskEVM as "just another EVM chain"; the key lies in its underlying logic—settling the productivity of the EVM ecosystem onto a privacy-compliant L1.
Recently, the community shared their progress pace, and what's worth noting are the engineering details. DuskDS, as the data availability layer and settlement layer, has been running stably on the mainnet. The Rusk upgrade is the final step before the DuskEVM mainnet. The core of this upgrade is a single word—connecting BLOB transaction processing. In other words, the pipeline for batch transactions from L2 to reach L1 has now been fully established.
Let's look at some hard data. BLOBs are produced at fixed intervals, roughly every 7 minutes per window. If a batch of EVM transactions cannot fit into a single BLOB, the system automatically splits it into subsequent windows. According to current parameters, a window can produce up to 6 BLOBs—you can think of this as the number of lanes on a high-speed settlement highway. The clearer the lanes, the more predictable the throughput and costs, which is extremely critical for compliant DeFi or RWA-type businesses, as these scenarios are highly sensitive to stability.
Now, let's consider the positioning itself. DuskEVM is an EVM-equivalent execution layer, but the settlement layer is on a non-EVM privacy-compliant L1 (DuskDS). This is not just a superficial change; it combines the "developer-friendly toolchain" with the "regulatory-compliant infrastructure" that institutions need.
The practical benefits are straightforward. Wallets and hardware signing devices in the EVM ecosystem will integrate more smoothly. For institutions and project teams, they can even quickly build custom L2s based on DuskDS—supporting optional permissioned or permissionless modes, flexible sequencer rules, and directly embedding regulatory requirements into parameters instead of PowerPoint slides. This flexibility is especially attractive for large projects that need to implement compliance effectively.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HalfBuddhaMoney
· 7h ago
Another L1+L2 combo move, but this time it seems like I really understand how to handle privacy compliance. A 7-minute BLOB window, up to 6 lanes. This number feels a bit tight...
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusDegen
· 7h ago
Hmm... Privacy compliance does have room for imagination, but can the number of lanes in BLOB really solve the cost issue?
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 7h ago
Really, the BLOB pipeline is well laid out, and compliant businesses finally have solid backing.
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 7h ago
Selling concepts again? Saying so much just to say that it is compatible with EVM and can achieve privacy compliance. It sounds good, but let's see when it actually runs.
View OriginalReply0
HappyMinerUncle
· 7h ago
Wait a minute, BLOB has a window every 7 minutes. Can this efficiency really compete? It still feels a bit slow...
Don't think of DuskEVM as "just another EVM chain"; the key lies in its underlying logic—settling the productivity of the EVM ecosystem onto a privacy-compliant L1.
Recently, the community shared their progress pace, and what's worth noting are the engineering details. DuskDS, as the data availability layer and settlement layer, has been running stably on the mainnet. The Rusk upgrade is the final step before the DuskEVM mainnet. The core of this upgrade is a single word—connecting BLOB transaction processing. In other words, the pipeline for batch transactions from L2 to reach L1 has now been fully established.
Let's look at some hard data. BLOBs are produced at fixed intervals, roughly every 7 minutes per window. If a batch of EVM transactions cannot fit into a single BLOB, the system automatically splits it into subsequent windows. According to current parameters, a window can produce up to 6 BLOBs—you can think of this as the number of lanes on a high-speed settlement highway. The clearer the lanes, the more predictable the throughput and costs, which is extremely critical for compliant DeFi or RWA-type businesses, as these scenarios are highly sensitive to stability.
Now, let's consider the positioning itself. DuskEVM is an EVM-equivalent execution layer, but the settlement layer is on a non-EVM privacy-compliant L1 (DuskDS). This is not just a superficial change; it combines the "developer-friendly toolchain" with the "regulatory-compliant infrastructure" that institutions need.
The practical benefits are straightforward. Wallets and hardware signing devices in the EVM ecosystem will integrate more smoothly. For institutions and project teams, they can even quickly build custom L2s based on DuskDS—supporting optional permissioned or permissionless modes, flexible sequencer rules, and directly embedding regulatory requirements into parameters instead of PowerPoint slides. This flexibility is especially attractive for large projects that need to implement compliance effectively.