2026-01-20 02:25:44

The stablecoin market size has reached trillions of dollars, but the transaction fees generated are continuously flowing to public blockchains like Ethereum—this ecological imbalance is being challenged by a new solution.

The XPL team has built a Layer 1 blockchain optimized specifically for USDT, with a straightforward core proposition: zero-fee transfers, ultra-fast confirmation speeds, and keeping the value of payments and settlements within the ecosystem. It sounds simple, but the innovative implementation is worth paying attention to—their Plasma One digital bank integrates payments, consumption, and earnings into a closed loop.

From a token perspective, XPL is not only a driver of network security but more importantly, it can capture growth opportunities generated by all stablecoin activities within the ecosystem. In other words, as transaction volume, user base, and liquidity accumulate on this chain, token holders stand at the center of this value reallocation.

This logic seems to bet on a fundamental fact: the efficiency bottlenecks of infrastructure such as centralized exchanges, cross-chain bridges, and liquidity aggregators do indeed exist, and dedicated chain solutions are gradually proving their feasibility.

ETH-5,16%

XPL-2,01%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xSunnyDay

· 01-20 02:55

Zero fees? Sounds like another hype, let's wait and see. --- The transaction fees for stablecoins are really outrageous, but can the XPL plan actually work... I’m not too convinced. --- Plasma One’s closed-loop sounds good, but I’m just worried it’s another scheme to scam money. --- More and more dedicated chains, will this one last over a year? --- The flow of transaction fees in the trillion-dollar market is indeed an issue, but who will guarantee security? --- Another Layer 1, this ecosystem is quite chaotic. --- Token holders are at the center? I’m more concerned about whether it can actually be used. --- I’ve heard about zero fees too many times, but the key is whether TPS and stability can hold without crashing. --- Sounds good in theory, but isn’t it just destined to run away with the funds in the end? --- This logic is a bit too optimistic, can it really snatch the cake from Ethereum?

View OriginalReply0

LonelyAnchorman

· 01-20 02:54

Zero fees? Sounds like the same old trick. Will true liquidity follow? Another dedicated chain. Will it survive the bear market this time... The fees for stablecoins are indeed outrageous, but I remain skeptical about how much XPL can intercept. Plasma One sounds advanced, but will users really migrate? That's the real question. The trillion-dollar market is tempting, but Ethereum's network effect isn't that easy to shake. Token capturing value? First, see if there's real trading volume before jumping to conclusions. Dedicated chain solutions are emerging everywhere. Why would this one be able to survive?

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 01-20 02:46

well, *actually* if zero fees sounds too good to be true, it probably is. where's the validator incentive model tho

Reply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 01-20 02:32

Zero fees? Sounds like another "revolutionary" plan... Looking forward to it not ending in a dead end. Another new chain trying to grab market share from ETH, will it work this time? I've heard the logic of dedicated stablecoin chains many times, but the key still depends on whether users buy into it. Plasma One sounds good, but the biggest fear in the blockchain community is that "perfect ideas" meet reality. Fees are definitely a pain point, but liquidity is the real issue. Can XPL truly keep value within the ecosystem... I have my doubts. Reallocating funds and offering zero fees again—feels a bit too idealistic. This kind of story is definitely attractive to capital, retail investors just want to see if they can make money. Dedicated chain plans will have to wait and see if they survive the next bear market. Promises of zero fees are often prone to failure; I've seen too many cases.

View OriginalReply0