Transfers take a few minutes to process, with fees ranging from a few dollars to dozens—this is a longstanding issue with traditional blockchain transfers. There is a project called Plasma, specifically designed to provide a solution for stablecoin payments, claiming to achieve zero fees and one-second confirmation times. It sounds promising, but the key question is: how does it achieve this?
The core logic is actually quite simple: the system covers the transaction fees, so users incur no costs. As long as your wallet contains stablecoins like USDT, you don't need to buy any additional tokens; just transfer or pay directly. Major wallets already support this scheme—just install the wallet and you can use it without any learning curve.
So what is XPL for? It’s not used for payments; it’s more like a "maintenance fund + governance tool" for the network. Holding XPL allows network overseers to earn rewards, developers need to use XPL to pay small fees to deploy applications, and token holders can participate in voting to decide network rules—essentially community governance.
There are also some highlights in practical application. In Latin America and Southeast Asia, it’s used for cross-border remittances, because the advantage of zero fees and instant transfers is especially significant—these regions are very sensitive to remittance costs. Additionally, the team has launched prepaid cards, enabling stablecoins to be directly used for shopping and dining in supermarkets and restaurants, with up to 4% cashback on transactions, expanding the use cases for digital assets.
Privacy considerations are also addressed. During transfers, amounts and information can be hidden, and when proof of funds is needed, users can selectively disclose some data. It supports fast Bitcoin transfers, catering to different user needs. From a product design perspective, this scheme is quite interesting—it not only solves speed and cost issues but also attempts to integrate into everyday life scenarios.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 3h ago
System pays the transaction fee? I need to quantify this logic... Who will cover the costs, and where are the risks?
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 3h ago
Zero fees sound great, but who will cover the system's payment costs? It just feels like something's off.
View OriginalReply0
fork_in_the_road
· 3h ago
Zero fees sound great, but who will cover the cost for system payments? Someone has to bear the expenses, right?
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 3h ago
Zero fees always sound too good to be true. I've seen the system proxy payment scheme before. How many can truly be implemented successfully?
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMiner
· 3h ago
Zero fees sound great, but where does the system's payment come from? In the end, it's still the users who pay.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 3h ago
Zero fees sound appealing, but that system of third-party payments... who ends up footing the bill in the end?
Transfers take a few minutes to process, with fees ranging from a few dollars to dozens—this is a longstanding issue with traditional blockchain transfers. There is a project called Plasma, specifically designed to provide a solution for stablecoin payments, claiming to achieve zero fees and one-second confirmation times. It sounds promising, but the key question is: how does it achieve this?
The core logic is actually quite simple: the system covers the transaction fees, so users incur no costs. As long as your wallet contains stablecoins like USDT, you don't need to buy any additional tokens; just transfer or pay directly. Major wallets already support this scheme—just install the wallet and you can use it without any learning curve.
So what is XPL for? It’s not used for payments; it’s more like a "maintenance fund + governance tool" for the network. Holding XPL allows network overseers to earn rewards, developers need to use XPL to pay small fees to deploy applications, and token holders can participate in voting to decide network rules—essentially community governance.
There are also some highlights in practical application. In Latin America and Southeast Asia, it’s used for cross-border remittances, because the advantage of zero fees and instant transfers is especially significant—these regions are very sensitive to remittance costs. Additionally, the team has launched prepaid cards, enabling stablecoins to be directly used for shopping and dining in supermarkets and restaurants, with up to 4% cashback on transactions, expanding the use cases for digital assets.
Privacy considerations are also addressed. During transfers, amounts and information can be hidden, and when proof of funds is needed, users can selectively disclose some data. It supports fast Bitcoin transfers, catering to different user needs. From a product design perspective, this scheme is quite interesting—it not only solves speed and cost issues but also attempts to integrate into everyday life scenarios.