According to recent policy analysis, the U.S. crypto market structure legislation could experience some progress this year, though a more realistic passage window appears to be 2027, with implementation rules potentially extending into 2029. One of the main obstacles blocking faster advancement centers on conflict-of-interest provisions—a point where Democrats and Republicans have notably different stances. These procedural disagreements, while seeming technical on the surface, represent fundamental disagreements about how to balance market participant interests with investor protection.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainFries
· 01-06 10:39
Will it be in 2027? Haha, that's hilarious. Politicians are still arguing about it.
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEater
· 01-06 04:51
2027 is still far away, implementation in 2029? This political game is really ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
wrekt_but_learning
· 01-06 04:48
2027? That's too optimistic. This can't be settled in less than ten or eight years.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 01-06 04:47
Can I only pass in 2027? Then I have to waste my coins in 2024...
View OriginalReply0
not_your_keys
· 01-06 04:36
Will there be hope in 2027? SMH, the current efficiency is truly incredible. Just internal conflicts alone will take until the year after next to resolve.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidator
· 01-06 04:35
Can only pass in 2027? Laughing out loud, it's another political drama. The conflict of interest clauses are just impossible to resolve.
According to recent policy analysis, the U.S. crypto market structure legislation could experience some progress this year, though a more realistic passage window appears to be 2027, with implementation rules potentially extending into 2029. One of the main obstacles blocking faster advancement centers on conflict-of-interest provisions—a point where Democrats and Republicans have notably different stances. These procedural disagreements, while seeming technical on the surface, represent fundamental disagreements about how to balance market participant interests with investor protection.