RWA (Real World Assets) has been hyped up endlessly, but no one talks about the most painful issue—the on-chain asset prices, who actually determines them?



It sounds like a philosophical question, but in reality, it's a technical challenge that could blow up the entire ecosystem.

Imagine you use tokenized U.S. Treasuries as collateral to borrow a large amount of USDT. U.S. Treasuries sound extremely stable, but where does the on-chain displayed price come from? If this price data is manipulated or consistently delayed, your collateral valuation could collapse in minutes, leading to a chain reaction of liquidations. Traditional DeFi relies on oracles for price feeds, which often encounter issues. When dealing with bonds, real estate, private credit—assets with irregular trading frequencies and vastly different liquidity—the difficulty skyrockets exponentially.

That's why APRO is important—a decentralized pricing network tailored specifically for RWA. It's not just about dumping traditional financial APIs onto the chain; it's fundamentally about solving the problem of "who sets the asset prices and how to prove that these prices are trustworthy."

Its approach boils down to two key points: first, using multiple data sources for consensus validation, rather than relying all on a single price feed; second, building a verification mechanism that makes the source, process, and update logic of price data transparent and auditable. Only then can the on-chain valuation of RWA assets truly be credible.

What does this logic mean for the entire RWA ecosystem? It shifts the trust basis from "I trust this institution" to "I trust this verification process." This might be the most overlooked but most crucial link in the RWA track.
RWA6,15%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PumpingCroissantvip
· 01-07 02:53
Oracles have been a real pit to fall into. If RWA wants to truly establish proper pricing, it needs to fundamentally change. We can't keep relying on the "trust me" approach anymore.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomistvip
· 01-05 05:51
honestly the oracle problem never stops being the actual nightmare nobody wants to admit... statistically speaking most "decentralized" pricing still just aggregates the same trash data sources, taxonomically incorrect at best
Reply0
NeverPresentvip
· 01-05 05:47
Oracles are indeed the Achilles' heel of RWA. If the price source is not transparent, a few rounds of play will lead to a complete explosion.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBustervip
· 01-05 05:44
To put it simply, the issues with oracles should have been taken seriously long ago. This time, someone finally hit the nail on the head.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 01-05 05:42
At the end of the day, it's still a trust issue. Decentralized pricing sounds great, but can it truly be fair and just? I just don't feel that optimistic.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)