Whether a public chain can produce good projects ultimately depends on one thing: how high its launch efficiency is.

Specifically, can the project team quickly acquire users, liquidity, and exposure? Can users participate at low cost and stay engaged? These are the key factors that determine whether the ecosystem can continue to attract new players.

TRON’s advantage in this area comes from its already quite mature infrastructure. How friendly are the transaction and transfer costs? How rich are the application entry points? These directly determine whether a cold start can quickly turn into a hot start. From another perspective, when infrastructure is no longer a bottleneck, the better the project’s story is told, the less friction there is for user participation.

What does this mean for participants? It means you don’t have to wait until the entire network is discussing it before you dare to enter. The higher the ecosystem launch efficiency, the more frequently new narratives emerge, the faster project iterations happen, and the friendlier the opportunity windows are for early participants. Instead of focusing on price fluctuations, it’s better to pay attention to the rhythm of the ecosystem and changes in application entry points, so you can spot “where the next wave of growth will start” earlier.

From the perspective of ecosystem builders, what TRON is still doing now is: making more developers and builders willing to invest long-term effort here. Clear collaboration pathways, continuous resource docking, stable promotional support—if this combination is well executed, it can provide participants with more certainty during cycle rotations. In simple terms, choosing a public chain ecosystem with strong organizational capacity is essentially an insurance for your long-term opportunities.