I was jolted awake in the middle of the night by a barrage of frantic calls. On the other end was a trembling voice with a Jiangxi accent: "My 6,000 yuan... it's just gone..."



We switched to video, and on the screen was a guy in his early twenties, his eyes red like a rabbit's. The situation was simple—he had put all 5,800 yuan of his capital into a 5x leveraged long position. The market only swung 3 points, and his account balance went straight to zero. I asked him to send me a screenshot, and after a quick look, I spotted the fatal flaw: he hadn’t set any stop losses, and his position size was 96.7% of his entire account.

This kind of thing happens every day. A lot of people think "going all-in is the way to get rich," but in reality, playing full leverage is like crossing the street with your eyes closed—it’s not about if something will go wrong, but when. In the past five years, eight out of ten liquidation cases I’ve seen were due to poor position management.

Let me break it down for you: Suppose you have 800 yuan. If you put 750 yuan into a 5x leveraged long, a 6% move against you and you’re done for. But if you only use 75 yuan with the same 5x leverage, it would take an 87% price drop against you to get wiped out—your risk tolerance is over twelve times higher.

To put it simply, getting liquidated isn’t really because “the leverage is too high.” You can use 10x or even 20x; the key is not to fire all your bullets at once. The biggest mistake the guy from Jiangxi made wasn’t using 5x leverage—it was putting nearly 97% of his capital into a single trade. With that kind of move, the market just has to sneeze and your account is in the hospital.

The most common mistake newbies make is confusing "high leverage" with "heavy position size." The former is just a tool; the latter is what’ll kill you. Remember this: leverage can amplify your gains, but only your position size determines how fast you’ll lose everything.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshivip
· 5h ago
Seriously, operating with a 97% position is basically giving money away. Who's to blame? Going all-in is an old story in the crypto space, but some people just don't listen to advice. A slight mistake in position management can turn you from a millionaire into a beggar—it's that real. Losing 5,800 bucks can make someone cry like this. I feel bad, but honestly, it's deserved. This guy really needs to reflect on his risk awareness.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_traumavip
· 5h ago
Oh man, here we go again... going all-in with leverage is basically suicide, no cap. Seriously, watching this guy just reminds me of when I first got into the space—almost lost everything the same way. Position management is more important than anything else, a hundred times more important than picking the right token. Totally agree, leverage is just a tool, but oversized positions are the real reapers. So true, this is how most retail investors wipe out—going all-in without thinking... Going all-in is a psychological issue, guys. Greed is the original sin. You really need to make setting stop-losses a habit, or you'll end up like this sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942vip
· 5h ago
People who go all-in are like this: they cry in the middle of the night, then rush back in during the day. After going through this cycle enough times, they just become numb.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrainvip
· 5h ago
No stop-loss in life, no stop-loss in the account either. This guy is truly brave. --- 96.7% position? This isn’t gambling, it’s stripping naked and dancing in a casino. --- Eight out of ten people I’ve seen blow up in five years did so because of position sizing, and you’re still studying leverage ratios? That’s a joke. --- Going all-in and getting rich is pure luck. For 99%, going all-in means going broke. That’s the harsh reality, brother. --- Betting 97% of your capital at once—just a tiny market move and it’s Game Over. This move is insane. --- So the real issue isn’t how much leverage you use, but whether you dare to risk only 10%. That’s the real dividing line. --- I can imagine the cry of that young guy from Jiangxi, but why didn’t he think of this sooner? --- Exactly. Leverage is just an amplifier; position sizing is the real executioner. --- If newbies don’t learn after reading this, they deserve to be taught a lesson by the market.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHermitvip
· 5h ago
Oh man, here we go again. Still calling yourself a good trader with a 96.7% position size? That’s just unbelievable. --- The all-in mentality is really a no-go. Nine out of ten liquidations happen because of this. --- No wonder people start panicking as soon as the market wobbles a bit—they have zero risk awareness. --- How are you supposed to play with just 6,000 bucks... and on 5x leverage? That’s gambling, not trading. --- There’s only one keyword: stop-loss. Setting this up saves you so much trouble. --- The market just coughs and your account ends up in the hospital—that’s harsh, but some people just won’t listen. --- Leverage itself isn’t the problem, greed is. I’ve seen too many stories like this. --- Position management is more important than anything, yet beginners never take it seriously.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapienvip
· 5h ago
靠...96.7%仓位,这哥们是真的勇啊,活生生把账户玩成了ICU
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)