JPMorgan’s latest research report reveals an interesting observation: at this stage, the key factor influencing Bitcoin’s price trend is no longer the traditional miner selling pressure, but rather institutions’ holding strategies.
Their analysts specifically pointed out that companies like MicroStrategy, which hold Bitcoin for the long term and have a “resolutely not selling” attitude, are the real forces shaping the market. The selling pressure from miners, who need to sell to cover operational costs? Compared to the determination of these whale-level players to hoard coins, its impact has become negligible.
This judgment is quite interesting—the market is undergoing a shift in discourse power. As a large amount of BTC is locked up by institutions, the circulating supply naturally tightens. These illiquid holdings essentially become the market’s price anchor.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaisyUnicorn
· 12-05 12:52
The shift of discourse power from miners to institutions is basically just a change of ownership in the garden. MicroStrategy and others have a much stronger determination to hoard coins than the miners who are forced to sell just to make a living. This logic does make sense...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreams
· 12-05 12:42
The people at MicroStrategy have really figured out the market. Now it's just a matter of seeing who can't hold it together first.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketGardener
· 12-05 12:38
Institutions are buying the dip, miners have become background players—I believe this logic. But what truly determines the price of BTC is still when these people decide to sell...
JPMorgan’s latest research report reveals an interesting observation: at this stage, the key factor influencing Bitcoin’s price trend is no longer the traditional miner selling pressure, but rather institutions’ holding strategies.
Their analysts specifically pointed out that companies like MicroStrategy, which hold Bitcoin for the long term and have a “resolutely not selling” attitude, are the real forces shaping the market. The selling pressure from miners, who need to sell to cover operational costs? Compared to the determination of these whale-level players to hoard coins, its impact has become negligible.
This judgment is quite interesting—the market is undergoing a shift in discourse power. As a large amount of BTC is locked up by institutions, the circulating supply naturally tightens. These illiquid holdings essentially become the market’s price anchor.