#美联储重启降息步伐 Have you noticed something really bizarre?
Right now, interest payments alone consume 14% of the US federal budget each year, even though Treasury yields are only at 3.7%. If market sentiment shifts one day and yields spike back to the 6% levels of the 1990s, the books would probably be torn up on the spot.
To put it bluntly, this is the classic opening of “Fiscal Dominance”—monetary policy completely loses its independence and is forced to revolve around plugging fiscal holes.
Here’s the issue: the newly appointed Fed Chair Hassett advocates for aggressive rate cuts, and the bond traders on Wall Street are seriously panicking. Why? Because under the rules of the bond market, rapid rate cuts only mean one thing—the government can’t hold up fiscally, and the central bank is preparing to compromise.
Once this expectation spreads through the market, long-term rates may actually be pushed up by capital flows, as investors demand higher risk premiums to hedge against potential future runaway inflation, excessive money printing, and policy swings.
The most absurd scenario could be: short-term rates come down, long-term rates are driven up by the market, and fiscal pressure not only fails to ease, but actually enters a vicious cycle. In the next few years, the market might enter a rather chaotic adjustment period.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTDreamer
· 3h ago
Damn, this logic reversal is insane. Cutting interest rates actually pushes up long-term rates? Isn’t that just a suicidal rescue?
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 20h ago
Hassett's move here doesn't make sense—cutting rates actually pushed up long-term yields, which is just absurd.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 20h ago
Hassett's move this time is really incredible. Cutting interest rates actually pushed up long-term rates—it's literally shooting himself in the foot.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 20h ago
Damn, this logic is just ridiculous. Cutting rates in the short term actually causes long-term interest rates to soar—it's totally shooting yourself in the foot.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBot
· 20h ago
Oh my, isn't this a dead loop... Cutting rates in the short term actually pushes up long-term interest rates—it's like shooting yourself in the foot.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truther
· 20h ago
Oh my, this is the real predicament—the central bank itself has been hijacked.
#美联储重启降息步伐 Have you noticed something really bizarre?
Right now, interest payments alone consume 14% of the US federal budget each year, even though Treasury yields are only at 3.7%. If market sentiment shifts one day and yields spike back to the 6% levels of the 1990s, the books would probably be torn up on the spot.
To put it bluntly, this is the classic opening of “Fiscal Dominance”—monetary policy completely loses its independence and is forced to revolve around plugging fiscal holes.
Here’s the issue: the newly appointed Fed Chair Hassett advocates for aggressive rate cuts, and the bond traders on Wall Street are seriously panicking. Why? Because under the rules of the bond market, rapid rate cuts only mean one thing—the government can’t hold up fiscally, and the central bank is preparing to compromise.
Once this expectation spreads through the market, long-term rates may actually be pushed up by capital flows, as investors demand higher risk premiums to hedge against potential future runaway inflation, excessive money printing, and policy swings.
The most absurd scenario could be: short-term rates come down, long-term rates are driven up by the market, and fiscal pressure not only fails to ease, but actually enters a vicious cycle. In the next few years, the market might enter a rather chaotic adjustment period.