In 2025, the market for Crypto Assets exchange-traded funds (ETFs) presents a distinct “one strong, one leading” pattern. The Bitcoin ETF has consolidated its position as the preferred choice for institutional deposits with an absolute market share ranging from 70% to 85% throughout the year, attracting a total of up to $31 billion in capital flows. Meanwhile, the share of the Ethereum ETF steadily climbed from the beginning of the year to between 15% and 30% in December, indicating an increasing acceptance of the second largest digital asset by institutions.
However, the unexpected delay of the U.S. “Clarity Act” at the end of the year triggered a net outflow of up to $952 million in global crypto ETP funds within a single week, with Ethereum products bearing the brunt of the pressure, adding a touch of uncertainty to the institutional narrative for 2025. This article will analyze the true preferences of institutional funds through detailed data and interpret how the regulatory process has become the “conductor” of short-term market sentiment.
The Ultimate Choice for Institutional Assets: Why the Narrative of Bitcoin as “Digital Gold” is Unbreakable?
Looking at the entire year of 2025, Bitcoin's performance in the ETF institutional “main battlefield” can be described as dominating. Data shows that its market share has consistently remained within the range of 70% to 85%, even in the context of multiple other Crypto Assets ETF products being launched one after another, this ratio has not seen significant fluctuations. This overwhelming concentration is not coincidental, but rather reflects the classic path of traditional financial institutions entering the crypto space: viewing Bitcoin as the primary, and sometimes the only, asset allocation target.
The net inflow of funds into Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, reaching as high as $31 billion, is the most direct proof of institutional demand, with the vast majority flowing into Bitcoin. This distribution of capital reveals a key understanding: in the investment portfolio models of many institutions, Bitcoin's role is unique. It is more often categorized as a macro hedging tool or “digital commodity,” similar to gold, rather than being mixed with “crypto assets” that include smart contract platforms and meme coins. This cognitive separation allows Bitcoin to largely remain unaffected by the dramatic fluctuations in other altcoin markets, securing independent price support. As a result, the ongoing institutional buying through channels like ETFs provides a solid price foundation for Bitcoin throughout 2025, leading it to consistently outperform the overall crypto market.
Despite the strong dominance, the market details still reveal some changes. As December approaches, the daily trading volume of Bitcoin spot ETFs has significantly shrunk, often struggling to break through the $5 billion mark. This decline in activity levels seems to indicate a shift in the behavior patterns of market participants towards the end of the year, with the market rhythm resembling the calm period of this summer rather than the explosive growth of last year's fourth quarter. This may suggest that after experiencing a robust institutionalization process, the market is seeking a new, more stable equilibrium.
The Advanced Path of Ethereum: From “Supporting Role” to Indispensable Institutional Allocation
Under the brilliance of Bitcoin, Ethereum's performance in the ETF market in 2025 resembles a steadily advancing “top student”. Its market share maintained between 15% and 30% throughout the year, firmly occupying the position of the second largest asset for institutional fund inflows. More noteworthy is that from the beginning of 2025 to December, Ethereum's share showed a clear trend of gradual expansion. This slow but certain growth trajectory marks a deepening recognition of Ethereum among institutional investors, shifting from initial cautious probing to more systematic allocation.
The market share of Ethereum has now become an effective barometer for measuring the strength of sentiment in the entire altcoin market relative to Bitcoin. When risk appetite increases, some allocations may overflow from Bitcoin to Ethereum; conversely, when regulatory or macro uncertainty rises, funds may quickly flow back to Bitcoin as a safe haven. Therefore, observing the changes in fund flows of Ethereum ETF is of significant reference value for predicting the overall risk sentiment in the market.
A strong story parallel to the ETF capital flow is the aggressive accumulation of Ethereum by listed companies. In recent weeks, despite the overall consolidation and pullback of the crypto market, the Ethereum reserves of listed companies' treasuries have surged. The total holdings quickly climbed from 4.5 million ETH at the beginning of the month to 5.09 million ETH at the time of writing. The main driver behind this is a company called BitMine Immersion. Through its aggressive “market financing” equity strategy, the company continuously issues new shares to raise funds, all of which are used to purchase Ethereum, as long as its stock price is above the net asset value, this “perpetual motion machine” acquisition model can continue. This independent and strong corporate purchasing power provides another layer of value support for Ethereum, distinct from ETF liquidity.
The key data of the funding “earthquake” triggered by the delay of the “Clarity Act”.
Total net outflow for the week: $952 million (the first outflow in four weeks)
Main Outflow Regions: United States ($99 billion), accounting for almost all outflows
Main Inflow Regions: Canada ($462 million), Germany ($156 million)
Most Damaged Asset: Ethereum (Net Outflow of 555 Million Dollars)
Affected Assets: Bitcoin (net outflow of 460 million USD)
Generate inflow assets against the trend: Solana (inflow of $485 million), XRP (inflow of $629 million)
Trigger Reason: The review of the U.S. “Clarity Act” has been postponed until January 2026.
Regulatory “Black Swan”: How the Delay of the “Clarity Act” Could Devastate Market Sentiment?
Just when the market thought that 2025 would end with a steady influx of institutional funds, a regulatory event dealt a heavy blow to the market. According to a report by CoinShares, due to the unexpected delay in the review process of the key U.S. legislation “Clarity Act,” global Crypto Assets investment products recorded a massive net outflow of $952 million in the past week, reversing the trend of inflows that had lasted for three consecutive weeks.
The “great capital flight” almost entirely occurred in the U.S. market, with outflows reaching as high as $99 billion in a single week. This clearly indicates that the pending regulatory framework is currently the biggest concern for U.S. institutional investors. The “Clear Act” aims to provide clear rules for asset classification, exchange regulation, and issuer obligations in the digital asset sector, and its legislative process is seen by the market as a key milestone for industry development. The delay until January 2026 undoubtedly extends policy uncertainty, directly dampening short-term market sentiment, especially for ETP products listed in the U.S.
In this funding reversal, Ethereum has become the “hard-hit area,” enduring the largest single-week outflow of $555 million. Analysts point out that this is mainly because Ethereum is in the eye of the storm in regulatory discussions—whether it should be classified as a security or a commodity directly relates to the compliance fate of many related products. Therefore, Ethereum is seen as the biggest potential beneficiary of the “Clearance Act,” while also becoming the most vulnerable asset in the face of regulatory uncertainty. Nevertheless, when extending the timeframe to the entire year, Ethereum products still recorded a net inflow of $12.7 billion, far exceeding the $5.3 billion in 2024, indicating that the long-term growth trend has not fundamentally changed.
Interestingly, in the atmosphere of a market-wide decline, funds are showing selectivity. Solana and XRP-related products received inflows of $485 million and $629 million respectively, continuing their relative strength over the past few weeks. This may indicate that some investors are taking advantage of the market pullback to tactically allocate to specific fundamentally strong altcoins. Although Bitcoin products experienced outflows of $460 million, their total inflow of $27.2 billion year-to-date still builds a massive asset base.
Market Outlook: Is the Institutionalization Process on “Pause” or “Shift”?
The capital outflow at the end of the year puts a question mark on the institutional narrative for the entire year of 2025. CoinShares Research Director James Butterfill pointed out that, as it stands, it is difficult for the total inflow of ETPs for the whole year of 2025 to exceed the record set in 2024. As of the report, the total assets under management of such products were $46.7 billion, slightly lower than the $48.7 billion in the same period of 2024. This comparison seems to suggest that the explosive phase of incremental funds dominated by U.S. institutions may have come to an end.
However, this does not mean the end of the institutionalization process; it is more likely a rhythm adjustment. Firstly, from a global perspective, despite significant capital outflow from the United States, places like Canada and Germany are still recording capital inflows, indicating that institutional demand in non-US markets remains resilient. Secondly, regulatory delays bring uncertainty rather than a permanent bearish sentiment. Once the “Clarity Act” makes progress in 2026, the suppressed institutional demand is likely to be released.
For investors, the current market structure provides important insights. Bitcoin's core value storage and hedging position have been reaffirmed amidst turmoil, remaining a ballast in institutional portfolios. Ethereum plays a dual role as both a market risk appetite indicator and a regulatory barometer, exhibiting greater volatility, but its long-term growth logic (corporate treasury accumulation, ETF share expansion) remains intact. Other mainstream altcoins like Solana show the ability to capture alpha during specific periods, detaching from the broader market.
Looking ahead to 2026, the market may enter a more complex and diversified institutional phase. Capital flows will not only depend on the narratives of the assets themselves but will be closely linked to the clarity of regulations in major jurisdictions around the world. For savvy market participants, maintaining a core allocation in Bitcoin while closely monitoring regulatory developments and flexibly seizing the allocation opportunities presented by emotional fluctuations in Ethereum and other leading ecosystems may be key to success in the next cycle. As of the time of writing, the price of Bitcoin is approximately $89,700, having risen nearly 2% over the week; the price of Ethereum is consolidating around $3,000, waiting for the next catalyst to arrive.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
2025 Cryptocurrency ETF Battle Report: Bitcoin's Dominance Remains Rock Solid, Ether's Share Quietly Expands
In 2025, the market for Crypto Assets exchange-traded funds (ETFs) presents a distinct “one strong, one leading” pattern. The Bitcoin ETF has consolidated its position as the preferred choice for institutional deposits with an absolute market share ranging from 70% to 85% throughout the year, attracting a total of up to $31 billion in capital flows. Meanwhile, the share of the Ethereum ETF steadily climbed from the beginning of the year to between 15% and 30% in December, indicating an increasing acceptance of the second largest digital asset by institutions.
However, the unexpected delay of the U.S. “Clarity Act” at the end of the year triggered a net outflow of up to $952 million in global crypto ETP funds within a single week, with Ethereum products bearing the brunt of the pressure, adding a touch of uncertainty to the institutional narrative for 2025. This article will analyze the true preferences of institutional funds through detailed data and interpret how the regulatory process has become the “conductor” of short-term market sentiment.
The Ultimate Choice for Institutional Assets: Why the Narrative of Bitcoin as “Digital Gold” is Unbreakable?
Looking at the entire year of 2025, Bitcoin's performance in the ETF institutional “main battlefield” can be described as dominating. Data shows that its market share has consistently remained within the range of 70% to 85%, even in the context of multiple other Crypto Assets ETF products being launched one after another, this ratio has not seen significant fluctuations. This overwhelming concentration is not coincidental, but rather reflects the classic path of traditional financial institutions entering the crypto space: viewing Bitcoin as the primary, and sometimes the only, asset allocation target.
The net inflow of funds into Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, reaching as high as $31 billion, is the most direct proof of institutional demand, with the vast majority flowing into Bitcoin. This distribution of capital reveals a key understanding: in the investment portfolio models of many institutions, Bitcoin's role is unique. It is more often categorized as a macro hedging tool or “digital commodity,” similar to gold, rather than being mixed with “crypto assets” that include smart contract platforms and meme coins. This cognitive separation allows Bitcoin to largely remain unaffected by the dramatic fluctuations in other altcoin markets, securing independent price support. As a result, the ongoing institutional buying through channels like ETFs provides a solid price foundation for Bitcoin throughout 2025, leading it to consistently outperform the overall crypto market.
Despite the strong dominance, the market details still reveal some changes. As December approaches, the daily trading volume of Bitcoin spot ETFs has significantly shrunk, often struggling to break through the $5 billion mark. This decline in activity levels seems to indicate a shift in the behavior patterns of market participants towards the end of the year, with the market rhythm resembling the calm period of this summer rather than the explosive growth of last year's fourth quarter. This may suggest that after experiencing a robust institutionalization process, the market is seeking a new, more stable equilibrium.
The Advanced Path of Ethereum: From “Supporting Role” to Indispensable Institutional Allocation
Under the brilliance of Bitcoin, Ethereum's performance in the ETF market in 2025 resembles a steadily advancing “top student”. Its market share maintained between 15% and 30% throughout the year, firmly occupying the position of the second largest asset for institutional fund inflows. More noteworthy is that from the beginning of 2025 to December, Ethereum's share showed a clear trend of gradual expansion. This slow but certain growth trajectory marks a deepening recognition of Ethereum among institutional investors, shifting from initial cautious probing to more systematic allocation.
The market share of Ethereum has now become an effective barometer for measuring the strength of sentiment in the entire altcoin market relative to Bitcoin. When risk appetite increases, some allocations may overflow from Bitcoin to Ethereum; conversely, when regulatory or macro uncertainty rises, funds may quickly flow back to Bitcoin as a safe haven. Therefore, observing the changes in fund flows of Ethereum ETF is of significant reference value for predicting the overall risk sentiment in the market.
A strong story parallel to the ETF capital flow is the aggressive accumulation of Ethereum by listed companies. In recent weeks, despite the overall consolidation and pullback of the crypto market, the Ethereum reserves of listed companies' treasuries have surged. The total holdings quickly climbed from 4.5 million ETH at the beginning of the month to 5.09 million ETH at the time of writing. The main driver behind this is a company called BitMine Immersion. Through its aggressive “market financing” equity strategy, the company continuously issues new shares to raise funds, all of which are used to purchase Ethereum, as long as its stock price is above the net asset value, this “perpetual motion machine” acquisition model can continue. This independent and strong corporate purchasing power provides another layer of value support for Ethereum, distinct from ETF liquidity.
The key data of the funding “earthquake” triggered by the delay of the “Clarity Act”.
Regulatory “Black Swan”: How the Delay of the “Clarity Act” Could Devastate Market Sentiment?
Just when the market thought that 2025 would end with a steady influx of institutional funds, a regulatory event dealt a heavy blow to the market. According to a report by CoinShares, due to the unexpected delay in the review process of the key U.S. legislation “Clarity Act,” global Crypto Assets investment products recorded a massive net outflow of $952 million in the past week, reversing the trend of inflows that had lasted for three consecutive weeks.
The “great capital flight” almost entirely occurred in the U.S. market, with outflows reaching as high as $99 billion in a single week. This clearly indicates that the pending regulatory framework is currently the biggest concern for U.S. institutional investors. The “Clear Act” aims to provide clear rules for asset classification, exchange regulation, and issuer obligations in the digital asset sector, and its legislative process is seen by the market as a key milestone for industry development. The delay until January 2026 undoubtedly extends policy uncertainty, directly dampening short-term market sentiment, especially for ETP products listed in the U.S.
In this funding reversal, Ethereum has become the “hard-hit area,” enduring the largest single-week outflow of $555 million. Analysts point out that this is mainly because Ethereum is in the eye of the storm in regulatory discussions—whether it should be classified as a security or a commodity directly relates to the compliance fate of many related products. Therefore, Ethereum is seen as the biggest potential beneficiary of the “Clearance Act,” while also becoming the most vulnerable asset in the face of regulatory uncertainty. Nevertheless, when extending the timeframe to the entire year, Ethereum products still recorded a net inflow of $12.7 billion, far exceeding the $5.3 billion in 2024, indicating that the long-term growth trend has not fundamentally changed.
Interestingly, in the atmosphere of a market-wide decline, funds are showing selectivity. Solana and XRP-related products received inflows of $485 million and $629 million respectively, continuing their relative strength over the past few weeks. This may indicate that some investors are taking advantage of the market pullback to tactically allocate to specific fundamentally strong altcoins. Although Bitcoin products experienced outflows of $460 million, their total inflow of $27.2 billion year-to-date still builds a massive asset base.
Market Outlook: Is the Institutionalization Process on “Pause” or “Shift”?
The capital outflow at the end of the year puts a question mark on the institutional narrative for the entire year of 2025. CoinShares Research Director James Butterfill pointed out that, as it stands, it is difficult for the total inflow of ETPs for the whole year of 2025 to exceed the record set in 2024. As of the report, the total assets under management of such products were $46.7 billion, slightly lower than the $48.7 billion in the same period of 2024. This comparison seems to suggest that the explosive phase of incremental funds dominated by U.S. institutions may have come to an end.
However, this does not mean the end of the institutionalization process; it is more likely a rhythm adjustment. Firstly, from a global perspective, despite significant capital outflow from the United States, places like Canada and Germany are still recording capital inflows, indicating that institutional demand in non-US markets remains resilient. Secondly, regulatory delays bring uncertainty rather than a permanent bearish sentiment. Once the “Clarity Act” makes progress in 2026, the suppressed institutional demand is likely to be released.
For investors, the current market structure provides important insights. Bitcoin's core value storage and hedging position have been reaffirmed amidst turmoil, remaining a ballast in institutional portfolios. Ethereum plays a dual role as both a market risk appetite indicator and a regulatory barometer, exhibiting greater volatility, but its long-term growth logic (corporate treasury accumulation, ETF share expansion) remains intact. Other mainstream altcoins like Solana show the ability to capture alpha during specific periods, detaching from the broader market.
Looking ahead to 2026, the market may enter a more complex and diversified institutional phase. Capital flows will not only depend on the narratives of the assets themselves but will be closely linked to the clarity of regulations in major jurisdictions around the world. For savvy market participants, maintaining a core allocation in Bitcoin while closely monitoring regulatory developments and flexibly seizing the allocation opportunities presented by emotional fluctuations in Ethereum and other leading ecosystems may be key to success in the next cycle. As of the time of writing, the price of Bitcoin is approximately $89,700, having risen nearly 2% over the week; the price of Ethereum is consolidating around $3,000, waiting for the next catalyst to arrive.