#ETF与衍生品 Looking at the comparison between the projects Lighter and Hyperliquid, my thoughts drifted back to 2017. Back then, we heard countless promises of "this time is different," only to see their true nature exposed in the post-TGE wave of incentives.
This time, there are indeed some differences. Lighter's business logic—using money to buy time rather than directly selling order flow—this design I have to admit is somewhat interesting. Zero fees for standard accounts, maintaining the ecosystem by charging professional market makers—compared to Hyperliquid's tiered fee structure based on trading volume, this approach is indeed more friendly to retail investors. From a cost perspective, at the mainstream retail size of $1,000 to $100,000, Lighter's total costs are indeed lower.
But what truly makes me alert is the narrative of the "Robinhood-Lighter-Citadel" triangle. It sounds almost too perfect and a bit dangerous. The background of founder Novakovski, Robinhood's investment, Citadel's liquidity support—these are all plus points, but it is precisely such a perfect story that often collapses most easily after TGE. Once the VC unlock schedule is set, how quickly will arbitrage funds move? We saw this clearly in the cycle of 2021.
Lighter does have technical advantages in L2 architecture and privacy protection, I won't deny that. ZK cross-chain, atomic state sharing, transaction privacy—all targeting institutional needs. But will institutional liquidity really come? Or is this just another round of "expectation game"?
The core risk is actually this: after the airdrop expectations are fulfilled and incentive funds fade, can organic trading volume take over? Hyperliquid has survived until now because it proved itself after the incentive programs ended. Lighter will have a hard time crossing this hurdle, and the difficulty won't be lower. History tells us that the outcome of DEX wars is often not determined by the hype at TGE but by those "boring but real" trading volume data.
The question now is: is this the beginning of the true challenge for Perp DEX against CEX, or just another cyclical illusion of prosperity? I lean towards the former, but I won't bet too heavily on any project.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#ETF与衍生品 Looking at the comparison between the projects Lighter and Hyperliquid, my thoughts drifted back to 2017. Back then, we heard countless promises of "this time is different," only to see their true nature exposed in the post-TGE wave of incentives.
This time, there are indeed some differences. Lighter's business logic—using money to buy time rather than directly selling order flow—this design I have to admit is somewhat interesting. Zero fees for standard accounts, maintaining the ecosystem by charging professional market makers—compared to Hyperliquid's tiered fee structure based on trading volume, this approach is indeed more friendly to retail investors. From a cost perspective, at the mainstream retail size of $1,000 to $100,000, Lighter's total costs are indeed lower.
But what truly makes me alert is the narrative of the "Robinhood-Lighter-Citadel" triangle. It sounds almost too perfect and a bit dangerous. The background of founder Novakovski, Robinhood's investment, Citadel's liquidity support—these are all plus points, but it is precisely such a perfect story that often collapses most easily after TGE. Once the VC unlock schedule is set, how quickly will arbitrage funds move? We saw this clearly in the cycle of 2021.
Lighter does have technical advantages in L2 architecture and privacy protection, I won't deny that. ZK cross-chain, atomic state sharing, transaction privacy—all targeting institutional needs. But will institutional liquidity really come? Or is this just another round of "expectation game"?
The core risk is actually this: after the airdrop expectations are fulfilled and incentive funds fade, can organic trading volume take over? Hyperliquid has survived until now because it proved itself after the incentive programs ended. Lighter will have a hard time crossing this hurdle, and the difficulty won't be lower. History tells us that the outcome of DEX wars is often not determined by the hype at TGE but by those "boring but real" trading volume data.
The question now is: is this the beginning of the true challenge for Perp DEX against CEX, or just another cyclical illusion of prosperity? I lean towards the former, but I won't bet too heavily on any project.