2025-12-31 00:25:26

The opportunity in Meme is indeed about抢时间, but the risks are not small—it's all about "chaos."

One trend worth paying attention to is the platformization approach, which is becoming a solution. In simple terms, it standardizes the most painful issues in the early stages—rules are transparent and unambiguous, the rhythm can be controlled, and the entry barriers are friendly. As a result, discussions can truly evolve into participation, and liquidity can settle.

Look at those projects that explode in popularity and then vanish instantly; many of them are not lacking in popularity. Where is the problem? The information gap is too exaggerated, and the rhythm is out of control. The hype comes quickly and dissipates even faster.

But once the mechanism is standardized, participation becomes predictable. You don't need to study the rules every time; if the套路 (套路) is the same, you can reuse it repeatedly. Grasp the rhythm, and your participation quality will naturally improve. This is the watershed that upgrades from "bottom-fishing mentality" to "systematic thinking."

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LongTermDreamer

· 01-03 00:20

Well... The idea of standardization sounds good, but how many can actually implement it? I've been hearing this argument for three years, and the result is...

View OriginalReply0

ShibaOnTheRun

· 01-02 21:10

Standardization sounds good, but when it comes to the actual implementation, it's still a mess.

View OriginalReply0

MetaEggplant

· 01-02 16:56

The idea of platformization sounds quite comfortable, but when it comes to actual implementation... well, it still depends on who sets the rules. Standardization is a good thing, but it can also easily become a new tool for cutting leeks.

View OriginalReply0

BearEatsAll

· 01-02 00:57

Standardization sounds good, but in reality, making money still depends on information asymmetry.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingersFrontrun

· 2025-12-31 00:49

Platformization sounds good, but I always feel that this set of logic ultimately becomes a game for big players... This is the real information gap, haha. Once the mechanism is standardized, retail investors' advantages will be gone, right?

View OriginalReply0

FantasyGuardian

· 2025-12-31 00:44

To be honest, standardization sounds good, but in practice, it still depends on the people. Transparent rules can't stop big players from cutting the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

BottomMisser

· 2025-12-31 00:44

Haha, this way of saying sounds comfortable, but in reality, it's still a mess to operate. Standardized rules? Ha, in the end, isn't it still information asymmetry that rules?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 2025-12-31 00:43

Is it the same old standardized approach? Sounds good, but when it comes to actually running, it still depends on the gas fees... I just lost a round in the Gwei war last night, and now I see pitfalls everywhere.

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 2025-12-31 00:42

That's true, but can this standardization really work in the meme community? It seems like it might stifle that wild spirit.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 2025-12-31 00:37

Standardization sounds great, but when it comes to actually operating, isn't it just those early entrants harvesting the newbies? To put it simply, it's just a different way of saying the same thing.

View OriginalReply0