Buy Crypto
Pay with
USD
USD
Buy & Sell
Hot
Supports Visa, MasterCard, SEPA & more
P2P
0 Fees
Flexible trading, zero fees
Gate Card
Use your crypto for payments worldwide
Markets
Trade
Basic
Advanced
Futures
Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Earn
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
tag
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Square
Square
Post, share, and explore crypto trends
Live
moments live
Live crypto market analysis
Chat
Chat with crypto traders
News
What is happening in crypto
flower_head
More
Promotions
AI
Diğerleri
TradFi
WCTC S8
Rewards
DEEPTECH

DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK Price

Closed
DEEPTECH
$0
+$0(%0,00)
No data

*Data last updated: 2026-04-17 05:28 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-17 05:28, DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH) is priced at $0, with a total market cap of --, a P/E ratio of 0,00, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $0 and $0. The current price is %0,00 above the day's low and %0,00 below the day's high, with a trading volume of --. Over the past 52 weeks, DEEPTECH has traded between $0 to $0, and the current price is %0,00 away from the 52-week high.

DEEPTECH Key Stats

P/E Ratio0,00
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Shares Outstanding0,00

DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH) FAQ

What's the stock price of DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH) today?

x
DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH) is currently trading at $0, with a 24h change of %0,00. The 52-week trading range is $0–$0.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH)?

x

Should you buy or sell DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH)?

x

How to buy DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

DEEPTECH_USDT
Perps
Trade

Hot Posts About DEEPEXI TECH 01384.HK (DEEPTECH)

RjHaroon

RjHaroon

16 hours ago
🚀 DEEPTECH/USDT Trade Setup 💰 Price: $10.464 📊 24H Change: +29.68% 💹 Volume: 49.81K 📍 Trade Setup 🔹 Entry: $9.80 – $10.30 🎯 Target 1: $11.50 🎯 Target 2: $12.80 🛑 Stop Loss: $9.00 ⚡ Market Insight: Strong move but very low volume ⚠️ High risk of volatility — trade only with confirmation, avoid blind entries.$DEEPTECH ‌$BTC ‌$RAVE ‌#Gate13thAnniversary #Gate13thAnniversaryLive #GatePreIPOsLaunchesWithSpaceX #CryptoMarketRecovery
DEEPTECH-%2,01
BTC-%0,40
RAVE+%26,84
0
0
0
0
SadMoneyMeow

SadMoneyMeow

04-08 04:36
![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-c195308574-89cf3f53e2-8b7abd-badf29) Dipu Technology (01384) surged more than 17% during intraday trading. As of the time of writing, the stock was up 11.08%, currently trading at HK$32.48, with trading volume of HK$199.6 million. Dipu Technology’s 2025 full-year performance shows that the company’s full-year revenue increased 70.8% year over year, while its adjusted net loss narrowed significantly by 71.4%. Operating quality has improved markedly. Of particular note, revenue from its FastAGI enterprise artificial intelligence solutions soared to RMB 254 million, jumping 181.5% year over year, becoming the largest revenue source. This indicates that the business engine has successfully switched to AI solutions. In addition, Dipu Technology previously released a brand-new product strategy that deeply integrated its three existing components: the FastData enterprise data fusion platform, the FastAGI enterprise agent platform, and the Deepexi enterprise large model, upgrading them into the “DeepexiOS” AI-grade enterprise operating system. The company’s core product positioning has also shifted from providing “Data + AI solutions” to “a foundational platform for digital employees for enterprises in the AI era.” (Editor: Liu Chang) 【Disclaimer】This article only represents the author’s personal views and is not related to Hexun. The Hexun website maintains a neutral stance toward the statements and viewpoints in this article, and does not provide any express or implied guarantees regarding the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information contained herein. Readers should treat this as reference only and bear all responsibility themselves. Email: news_center@staff.hexun.com
0
0
0
0
WuSaidBlockchainW

WuSaidBlockchainW

04-06 23:51
Author | Stablecoin Insider / McKinsey×Artemis Compiled by | Deep Tide TechFlow Original article link： Intro: The McKinsey and Artemis joint report did something that very few people in the industry have done—break down stablecoin transaction-volume data. The conclusion is that out of roughly $35 trillion in annual on-chain transaction volume, only about $390 billion (about 1%) represents real payment activity, of which 58% is B2B financial operations, growing 733% year over year. Consumer-side stablecoin usage is almost negligible, and that’s not a coincidence. — — The article summarizes five structural reasons that explain why the gap between institutions and individuals is not just a temporary shortfall. Full text below: The stablecoin industry has a problem at the “headline” level. On the one hand, the original on-chain data shows that hundreds of billions of dollars flow on-chain every year. This figure has spawned endless comparisons to Visa and Mastercard, as well as predictions that SWIFT is about to be replaced. On the other hand, a landmark report released by McKinsey and Artemis Analytics in February 2026 strips all of that away and asks a more direct question: Of that, how much is actually real payments? The answer is about 1%. Out of approximately $35 trillion in annualized stablecoin transaction volume, only about $390 billion represents genuine end-user payments, such as supplier invoices, cross-border remittances, payroll disbursements, and card-based spending. The rest consists of trading activity, internal funds transfers, arbitrage behavior, and automated smart contract loops. The report concludes that the inflated headline numbers should be “the starting point for analysis, not a proxy indicator for measuring payment adoption.” But within that real $390 billion baseline, there is a story worth digging into—one that almost entirely revolves around corporate finance rather than consumer wallets. B2B dominates: what the data actually says Based on McKinsey/Artemis analysis (using event data from December 2025 as the baseline), B2B transactions account for $226 billion of all real stablecoin payment volume—about 58%. This figure represents 733% year-over-year growth, driven mainly by supply-chain payments, cross-border supplier settlement, and financial liquidity management. Asia leads in geographic activity, but adoption in Latin America and Europe is also accelerating. The remaining portion of real payments is distributed across payroll disbursements and remittances ($90 billion), capital market settlement ($8 billion), and associated card spending ($4.5 billion). According to McKinsey data, card spend associated with stablecoins is up an astonishing 673% year over year, but in absolute terms it still represents only a small fraction of B2B flow. For reference: This total $390 billion amount is only 0.02% of McKinsey’s estimated global annual payments volume of over $20 trillion. Specifically, B2B stablecoin flow makes up about 0.01% of the $160 trillion global B2B payments market. These numbers are large in the stablecoin context, but they remain minuscule in the context of the global financial system. Monthly turnover-rate data makes the momentum more intuitive. Citing BVNK’s data from the McKinsey/Artemis report, in January 2024, stablecoin monthly payment volume was only $5 billion; by early 2026, it had exceeded $30 billion. — — It grew sixfold in less than two years, with the steepest acceleration occurring in the second half of 2025. On an annualized basis, this turnover rate now exceeds $390 billion. “Real stablecoin payments are far below conventional estimates. This does not undermine stablecoins’ long-term potential as a payment rail—it simply establishes a clearer baseline for assessing where the market stands.” — — McKinsey/Artemis Analytics, February 2026 Why the gap exists: five structural forces that exclude retail The divergence between B2B’s explosive adoption and consumers’ near-irrelevance is not a coincidence. It is the product of structural asymmetries that favor enterprise use cases over retail use cases. Here are the five forces driving the institutional gap: 1) Financial efficiency beats consumer convenience Corporate treasurers are driven by specific, measurable pain points: SWIFT’s agent chain that can take one to five business days to settle, currency-exchange windows that tie up liquidity, and intermediary fees stacked at every transaction step. Stablecoins solve all three problems at once. For a company paying suppliers across fifteen countries, the economics are straightforward; for a consumer buying coffee, they are not. The switching incentives on the enterprise side are orders of magnitude larger than for individual users. 2) Programmability has no equivalent value on the retail side Part of B2B’s explosion is a story of programmable payments. Smart contracts enable conditional logic—invoice triggers, delivery confirmation, escrow release—automating entire accounts payable workflows at scale. This naturally fits enterprise finance operations, because high-value, structured, and repetitive payment processes benefit massively from automation. Retail payments lack similarly scalable trigger applications at any size. Consumers buying groceries don’t need programmable conditions—they need something that works like swiping a card. The cognitive complexity of blockchain-native payments remains a barrier on the retail side, and programmability provides no help. 3) The regulatory architecture favors institutions After the GENIUS Act, institutional operators have completed the adaptation of compliance frameworks such as anti–money laundering/anti–terrorist financing, travel rules, and licensing requirements, and built the legal infrastructure to operate with confidence. Corporate finance teams have dedicated compliance functions that can absorb entry frictions; individual consumers cannot. As a result, in most jurisdictions, the on-ramps for stablecoins remain operationally complex for retail users, while merchant acceptance gaps persist globally. Every frictionless B2B payment today is a data point that institutions use to justify further investment. Meanwhile, the consumer ecosystem is waiting for a compliant, seamless user-experience entry point that has not yet emerged at scale. 4) The advantage of closed-loop systems B2B stablecoin payments succeed precisely because they are closed-loop: enterprises send to enterprises; both sides have wallets; both have compliance infrastructure; and neither side needs a universal merchant network. Consumer payments face the classic chicken-and-egg problem: before consumers have demand, merchants won’t invest in building stablecoin acceptance infrastructure; and before consumers can spend widely, consumers won’t activate wallets. The institutional world bypasses this entirely by operating in bilateral or consortium environments, without any open merchant network. 5) Institutional incentives point upstream For institutional treasurers holding stablecoins, the benefits include yield, reduced FX exposure, and improved liquidity management—advantages that accumulate internally. Sharing them downstream introduces complexity or exposes competitive fragility. Rolling stablecoin usage out to suppliers’ suppliers, employees, or end consumers requires building a network that makes those downstream parties benefit—and that may not align with the originating finance team’s incentives. In the absence of a clear ROI that compels networks to expand outward, enterprises rationally choose to consolidate internal gains. Market context BVNK’s infrastructure data itself confirms B2B’s dominance from an operator perspective. The company processed $30 billion in annualized stablecoin payments in 2025, up 2.3x year over year, with one-third of the volume coming from the U.S. market. Its customer roster (Worldpay, Deel, Flywire, Rapyd, Thunes) consists of leaders in cross-border B2B and payroll infrastructure—not consumer applications. As BVNK noted in its 2025 year-end review: “The initial assumption was that remittances and consumer transfers would lead stablecoin growth, but they did not become the main driver; B2B instead played that role.” When will retail catch up—or if it can The McKinsey/Artemis baseline makes the current situation clearly visible. What it cannot answer is whether the institutional gap will narrow, widen, or become permanently entrenched. Here are three possible scenarios for the next 18 months: Early 2026 — — the gap widens further There are no signs that B2B momentum is slowing. The monthly turnover rate above $30 billion continues as more enterprises use stablecoin rails for cross-border accounts payable and financial operations. Consumer stablecoin card spending grows slightly, but in absolute terms it remains negligible relative to B2B flow. Even if retail adoption gradually advances in percentage terms, the gap still expands in dollar absolute value. End of 2026 to 2027 — — a turning point begins to appear Several catalysts may start to close the gap: multi-currency stablecoins issued by banks reduce retail on-ramp friction; programmable features delegated through AI agents extend to consumer applications; and gig-economy wages paid in stablecoins create downstream consumer balances. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent predicts that the stablecoin supply could reach $3 trillion by 2030. This trajectory implies that consumer network effects will eventually emerge. The counterpoint — — retail may never “catch up,” and that may be the key The most honest interpretation of the McKinsey data is that stablecoins may be evolving into what the report subtly suggests: a programmable settlement layer for machines, finance departments, and institutions on the internet, where consumer adoption is an indirect, embedded benefit rather than a primary use case. If this framework holds, then the institutional gap is not a failure of adoption, but a feature of the technology’s natural architecture. Enterprise payroll paid in stablecoins may ultimately create downstream spending, but the path from B2B infrastructure to retail wallets is long and circuitous—and depends on user-experience breakthroughs that have not yet emerged at scale. An honest baseline The McKinsey/Artemis report does something more valuable than simply recording stablecoin growth: it establishes an honest baseline that the industry has long been clearly missing. By stripping away transaction noise, internal transfers, and automated smart contract loops, it reveals a payments market that is truly growing—real payment volume doubled from 2024 to 2025—yet it is highly concentrated on the institutional side in a structural, non-coincidental way. B2B’s 733% growth is not a delayed consumer story; it is a finance story that is already maturing. Enterprises building on the stablecoin rails today are solving real operational problems—cross-border frictions, agent-bank inefficiencies, and working-capital delays—issues that have nothing to do with whether consumers hold stablecoin wallets. Either way, they will keep building.
2
0
0
0