META

Meta Platforms Price

META
$578,75
+$6,23(+%1,08)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-07 21:49 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-07 21:49, Meta Platforms (META) is priced at $578,75, with a total market cap of $1,43T, a P/E ratio of 27,52, and a dividend yield of %0,36. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $564,76 and $578,71. The current price is %2,47 above the day's low and %0,00 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 2,27M. Over the past 52 weeks, META has traded between $520,00 to $796,25, and the current price is -%27,31 away from the 52-week high.

META Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$573,02
Market Cap$1,43T
Volume2,27M
P/E Ratio27,52
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,36
Dividend Amount$0,52
Diluted EPS (TTM)23,98
Net Income (FY)$60,45B
Revenue (FY)$200,96B
Earnings Date2026-04-29
EPS Estimate6,67
Revenue Estimate$55,35B
Shares Outstanding2,49B
Beta (1Y)1.309
Ex-Dividend Date2026-03-16
Dividend Payment Date2026-03-26

About META

Meta Platforms, Inc. engages in the development of products that enable people to connect and share with friends and family through mobile devices, personal computers, virtual reality headsets, and wearables worldwide. It operates in two segments, Family of Apps and Reality Labs. The Family of Apps segment offers Facebook, which enables people to share, discuss, discover, and connect with interests; Instagram, a community for sharing photos, videos, and private messages, as well as feed, stories, reels, video, live, and shops; Messenger, a messaging application for people to connect with friends, family, communities, and businesses across platforms and devices through text, audio, and video calls; and WhatsApp, a messaging application that is used by people and businesses to communicate and transact privately. The Reality Labs segment provides augmented and virtual reality related products comprising consumer hardware, software, and content that help people feel connected, anytime, and anywhere. The company was formerly known as Facebook, Inc. and changed its name to Meta Platforms, Inc. in October 2021. Meta Platforms, Inc. was incorporated in 2004 and is headquartered in Menlo Park, California.
SectorCommunication Services
IndustryInternet Content & Information
CEOMark Elliot Zuckerberg
HeadquartersMenlo Park,CA,US
Official Websitehttp://www.meta.com
Employees (FY)78,86K
Average Revenue (1Y)$2,54M
Net Income per Employee$766,60K

Learn More about Meta Platforms (META)

Gate Learn Articles

Understanding the Meta-game.

Meta-game is a complex and esoteric concept in the field of encryption, involving game theory and behavioral economics. It includes underlying mechanisms, behavioral changes, best response functions, and reflex loops. Metagames inspire narratives through catalysts, influence price movements, and form reflexive loops through behavioral changes among market participants. Metagames can be self-enhancing or self-defeating, affecting their duration and trading strategies. The article uses examples such as the ETH killer trade, Facebook’s rebranding to Meta, and BTC ETF flows to demonstrate how the metagame works and how investors can identify and exploit these games to gain value.

2024-05-27

What are Meta Transactions (ERC-2771)? (2025)

What are Meta Transactions (ERC-2771)? (2025) Learn about this standard and meta transactions. Explore its benefits, mechanics, and 2025 latest developments including expanded real-world applications in gaming and NFT platforms, Biconomy's multi-chain relayer advancements, improved ecosystem integration, and enhanced security frameworks driving mainstream blockchain adoption through gasless interactions.

2025-06-17

Pendle - Beyond the Point Meta

"Point Meta" refers to a system that distributes points through a protocol. Pendle’s YT function essentially allows users to "leverage to purchase points," attracting significant capital to the platform. However, Boros has introduced a series of additional features, creating a flywheel effect and achieving product-market fit.

2024-12-11

Meta Platforms (META) FAQ

What's the stock price of Meta Platforms (META) today?

x
Meta Platforms (META) is currently trading at $578,75, with a 24h change of +%1,08. The 52-week trading range is $520,00–$796,25.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Meta Platforms (META)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Meta Platforms (META)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Meta Platforms (META)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Meta Platforms (META)?

x

Should you buy or sell Meta Platforms (META) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Meta Platforms (META)?

x

How to buy Meta Platforms (META) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Meta Platforms (META) Latest News

2026-04-03 00:16

SpaceX increases its IPO target valuation to $2 trillion, surpassing Meta and Tesla

Gate News message, April 3, a person with knowledge of the matter revealed that SpaceX has raised its target valuation for its first initial public offering (IPO) to more than $2 trillion. The company and its advisers are sharing this valuation target with prospective investors as they prepare for meetings over the coming weeks. These so-called “tasting-the-water” briefings may include more information supporting the valuation. In February, reports said that after SpaceX acquired Musk’s xAI, the combined company’s valuation was $1.25 trillion. Based on a $2 trillion valuation, SpaceX would surpass all companies in the S&P 500 except for Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, Microsoft, and Amazon, and it would also surpass two additional companies among the U.S. stock “Magnificent Seven”—Meta and Tesla, which is also under Musk’s control.

2026-04-01 09:47

Bitcoin’s market cap drops to the world’s 14th largest asset, overtaken by Meta and Tesla

Gate News report: On April 1, according to 8marketcap data, Bitcoin (BTC) currently has a market cap of about $1.37 trillion, ranking 14th globally by asset market value, down 2 places from earlier. Meta Platforms (Facebook) has a market cap of about $1.447 trillion, ranking 12th; Tesla has a market cap of about $1.394 trillion, ranking 13th—both of which are ahead of Bitcoin.

2026-04-01 04:30

US tech mega-caps rebound collectively; Meta rises 6.67%, and Nvidia jumps 5.59%

Gate News, April 1, as geopolitical risks between the US and Iran notably cooled and boosted sentiment, the U.S. stock technology “Big Seven” (Meta, Nvidia, Google, Tesla, Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple) all rebounded today. Among them, Meta and Nvidia led the gains, up 6.67% and 5.59%, respectively; Google, Tesla, Amazon, Microsoft, and Apple rose in tandem, between 2.9% and 5.14%. The easing of the geopolitical situation effectively reduced the global risk premium, prompting capital to flow back into high-beta growth assets.

2026-03-28 02:35

The US stock market has evaporated over a trillion this week, falling for five consecutive weeks to a new low. The "seven giants" have collectively lost about 870 billion dollars.

BlockBeats news, on March 28, the S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow Jones all fell this week, marking the longest consecutive five-week decline since 2022. The total market capitalization of the seven tech giants shrank by about $870 billion in one week, with the Nasdaq down more than 13% from its peak in October last year. This week, U.S. stocks weakened significantly under multiple negative pressures. By Friday's close, the Dow Jones plunged 793 points in a single day, the S&P 500 fell to a seven-month low, and the Nasdaq further entered a technical correction zone. The average maximum drawdown of the 500 stocks in the S&P 500 has reached 17%, while the average maximum drawdown of Nasdaq stocks is even higher at 31%, indicating that the actual damage is far worse than the index numbers suggest. The tech sector was hit hardest. Meta fell about 12% in one week due to the dual pressure of losing two child safety lawsuits and layoff news; Tesla and Amazon both saw declines of over 3%; Nvidia was dragged down by shrinking expectations for AI capital expenditures, dropping nearly 5%. The total market capitalization of the "seven giants" evaporated by about $870 billion over the week, equivalent to over 6.3 trillion yuan. From a market structure perspective, the breadth and depth of this decline should not be underestimated. Although the main indices fell between 7% and 13%, more than half of the individual stocks have dropped over 20% from their respective peaks, entering a technical bear market.

Hot Posts About Meta Platforms (META)

TestnetScholar

TestnetScholar

48 minutes ago
President Donald Trump is bringing Big Tech into the policy room, tapping 13 leaders in American technology onto his President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). According to a White House press release, the group includes Marc Andreessen (Andreessen Horowitz), Sergey Brin (Google), Safra Catz (Oracle), Michael Dell (Dell Technologies), Jacob DeWitte (Oklo), Fred Ehrsam (Coinbase co-founder), Larry Ellison (Oracle), David Friedberg (Ohalo Genetics), Jensen Huang (Nvidia), John Martinis (Google Quantum AI), Bob Mumgaard (Commonwealth Fusion Systems), Lisa Su (AMD), and Mark Zuckerberg (Meta). Co-chaired by David Sacks and Michael Kratsios, the council is tasked with addressing both the opportunities and risks of emerging technologies, in particular, their impact on jobs, as the US ramps up efforts to lead in artificial intelligence. The White House said the body could eventually expand to 24 members, with more appointments expected soon. The latest appointments come after Trump issued an executive order in January rebooting PCAST as a top-tier advisory group. Designed to secure American leadership in AI, quantum computing, and biotech, the council brings together experts from universities, tech companies, and government to provide unbiased, science-based advice on tech, the economy, security, and education, while pushing back against forces threatening scientific integrity. Trump rewards AI firms that play by the rules --------------------------------------------- The Trump administration is pushing an AI strategy focused on speed and global leadership, but recent actions have raised questions. Anthropic faced a major setback after being banned from federal use due to perceived supply-chain risks, amid tensions over military-related AI restrictions. In contrast, OpenAI secured a rapid agreement with the Department of Defense, including classified access with strict guardrails. **Disclosure:** This article was edited by Vivian Nguyen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
0
0
0
0
probably_nothing_anon

probably_nothing_anon

2 hours ago
Been spending some time on Polymarket lately, and I gotta say - the rush you get from nailing a prediction is genuinely addictive. But here's what nobody talks about: does scratching that itch actually make you money? I think most people miss the fundamental difference between betting on outcomes and actually building wealth. When you're on Polymarket, you're playing a binary game. Right or wrong. Win or lose. Your capital either comes back or it doesn't. There's no middle ground, no partial wins. Compare that to owning a real AI stock like Nvidia, and suddenly you realize you're comparing two completely different animals. The thing about prediction markets is they're designed to be entertaining. They tap into our dopamine receptors. Someone launches a product, a political event happens, earnings come out - and boom, you can bet on it. It's gamification at its finest. But here's the catch: as soon as that bet expires and you lose, your money is just gone. Zero value. You're playing in a zero-sum game where every winner needs a loser. Nvidia, though? That's a different story entirely. The company didn't just ride the AI wave - it basically built the infrastructure that the wave runs on. Every major hyperscaler you can think of - Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta - they're all running their AI operations on Nvidia's GPUs. That's not speculation. That's infrastructure. And with AI spending accelerating across the board, demand for their Blackwell chips and the upcoming Rubin architecture isn't slowing down anytime soon. When you own an AI stock like Nvidia, you're not betting on a single outcome. You're tying yourself to a long-term secular trend. Yeah, the stock price bounces around - that's normal. But over time, you're compounding wealth through a company that's genuinely indispensable to where the world is heading. Now, I'm not saying Polymarket is completely useless. Actually, it can be a solid tool for reading the room. I've watched prediction markets nail sentiment calls before earnings. When I was tracking Nvidia's latest earnings report, the market was surprisingly accurate at gauging where things were headed. So as a thermometer for where people think things are going? Sure, it works. But as a wealth-building machine? That's a completely different proposition. The real question is what you're optimizing for. If you want entertainment and short-term thrills, prediction markets scratch that itch. If you want to actually compound capital over years and decades, you need to be in real businesses. An AI stock with genuine competitive advantages and secular tailwinds is going to beat a coin toss every single time. There's also something to be said about the psychology of it all. Prediction markets reward impulsive decisions and narrative chasing. They're built on short-term cycles. Owning stocks like Nvidia rewards patience and conviction. You're not checking it every five minutes hoping for a payout - you're holding a position in a company that's reshaping entire industries. I think smart investors can use both. Use Polymarket as a sentiment gauge if you want. But when it comes to actually deploying capital for wealth generation? You need to be thinking in terms of years, not days. You need exposure to the companies that are powering the future, not just betting on what happens next week. The historical numbers back this up too. When you look at the returns from actually owning AI stocks versus playing prediction markets, there's no comparison. The compounding effect of holding real equity in companies driving technological change absolutely demolishes the returns from speculative bets. So here's my take: Use Polymarket if you want to test your market intuition or have some fun. But if you're serious about building durable wealth, you need a different playbook. That means identifying AI stocks and semiconductor plays with real staying power. Companies that aren't just riding a trend but actually enabling it. The dopamine hit from winning a Polymarket bet? Yeah, it feels good for a moment. But the wealth-building power of owning a position in the infrastructure companies powering the AI revolution? That's the real game. That's where you build generational wealth. If you're looking at where to actually put your capital to work, the choice between prediction markets and quality AI stocks isn't even close.
1
0
0
0
CoffeeNFTrader

CoffeeNFTrader

5 hours ago
- Advertisement -![](https://img-cdn.gateio.im/social/moments-957b2ac178-c9c8e7474f-8b7abd-badf29) * * * * * Decentralized exchange aggregator Matcha Meta has confirmed a security incident linked to its SwapNet integration, resulting in an estimated $16.8 million loss. The breach was first flagged by blockchain security firm PeckShield, with further technical analysis later provided by CertiK. ### What Went Wrong According to findings shared by security researchers, the exploit specifically impacted users who had disabled Matcha Meta’s “One-Time Approval” feature. By opting out, those users granted persistent permissions directly to the SwapNet router contract, creating an attack surface that was later abused. > #PeckShieldAlert Matcha Meta has reported a security breach involving SwapNet. Users who opted out of "One-Time Approvals" are at risk. > > So far, ~$16.8M worth of crypto has been drained. > > On #Base, the attacker swapped ~10.5M $USDC for ~3,655 $ETH and has begun bridging funds to… https://t.co/QOyV4IU3P3 pic.twitter.com/6OOJd9cvyF > > — PeckShieldAlert (@PeckShieldAlert) January 26, 2026 CertiK identified the root cause as an “arbitrary call” vulnerability in the SwapNet contract. This flaw allowed an attacker to initiate unauthorized transfers from wallets that had previously approved the router, effectively bypassing normal safeguards. ### Fund Movement and Scope On-chain activity shows the attacker swapped approximately $10.5 million in USDC on Base for around 3,655 ETH, before bridging the assets to Ethereum. The cross-chain movement appears designed to complicate tracking and recovery efforts. Importantly, the incident did not affect all Matcha users. Exposure was limited to wallets that had manually disabled one-time approvals and granted direct permissions to SwapNet contracts. ### Bitcoin Tops Gold and Silver in $100,000 Investment Poll ### Emergency Response Measures In response to the exploit, Matcha Meta has taken several immediate steps: * SwapNet contracts have been suspended to prevent further losses. * Users have been urged to revoke existing approvals, particularly for the SwapNet router contract (0x616000e384Ef1C2B52f5f3A88D57a3B64F23757e). * The platform has removed the option to disable one-time approvals, aiming to reduce similar risks going forward. The incident highlights the security trade-offs associated with persistent contract approvals and reinforces the importance of regular permission reviews, especially when interacting with aggregators and routing contracts.
0
0
0
0