Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
U.S. Stablecoin Regulatory Dual-Track System: Analyzing the Path Differences Between the STABLE Act and the GENIUS Act
Recent legislation in the U.S. Congress regarding stablecoin regulation has attracted market attention. The House of Representatives' proposed "STABLE Act" and the Senate's promoted "GENIUS Act" showcase distinctly different regulatory approaches.
In simple terms, the "STABLE Act" adopts a relatively conservative regulatory stance, requiring stablecoin issuers to maintain a 1:1 reserve of cash, U.S. Treasury bonds, or highly liquid assets. While there is no issuance cap, the scope of business is strictly limited, only allowing for basic services such as issuance, redemption, and custody. Additionally, it stipulates that false reporting will face heavy penalties.
In contrast, the "GENIUS Act" places greater emphasis on market efficiency, allowing reserve assets to include repurchase agreements and money market fund investments, and adopts a tiered regulatory model, implementing federal oversight for issuers with assets exceeding $10 billion, while granting stablecoin holders priority in bankruptcy settlements.
Currently, the progress of the two bills is uneven. The "GENIUS Bill" has been approved by the Senate Banking Committee, and the White House has expressed support; while the revised "STABLE Bill" has just been submitted for review by the House of Representatives. Market analysis shows that if the "GENIUS Bill" is ultimately passed, it may attract more institutional investors to enter the market; while the strict regulations of the "STABLE Bill" may suppress industry innovation.
It is worth noting that the reserve compliance rate of existing major stablecoin issuers is only 66%-83%. Regardless of which bill is passed, it will force them to adjust their operating models. This regulatory game not only concerns the development of the US stablecoin market but will also have far-reaching effects on global cryptocurrency policy.
Do you support the strict risk control of the "STABLE Act" more? Or do you have more confidence in the flexible regulation of the "GENIUS Act"? Leave your opinion in the comments!
#稳定币监管 #STABLE Act #GENIUS Act