Of all involved parties I actually think LZ is being treated the most unfairly.


Yes they could have added additional safeguards but it's not like they had negligent security, they had very good security and were the target of a state sponsored and highly sophisticated attack.
All KelpDAO had to do on the other hand was read the LayerZero docs before using it to secure their multi billion dollar protocol.
All Aave had to do was look at KelpDAO's LayerZero config.
Not saying all three aren't to blame (they all deserve a share) but that's how I see it.
ZRO3,43%
AAVE0,28%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin