Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Someone asked me if cutting off royalties in the secondary market means creators are doomed. To be honest, I’d rather first observe “who changed the default parameters, who hid the switches even deeper”… They talk about a free market, but their hands are full of permission battles. Royalties are not an inherent tax by nature; they rely on consensus and the execution chain: if the contract is written but not recognized by the trading platform, it’s useless; but if it’s completely ignored, in the end only marketing accounts and projects that rely on connections remain, making it even harder for genuine content creators to survive. Recently, someone compared RWA and US bond yields to on-chain yield products, and I just want to laugh: one side is transparent interest rates, the other is “do you believe I won’t change the rules.” Anyway, when I look at projects now, I first check the governance/permission evidence chain—don’t talk to me about sentimental values, just make it clear who can toggle the switches.