Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#USIranCeasefireTalksFaceSetbacks
The US-Iran conflict, which began in late February 2026 and deeply shook the global geopolitical landscape, has entered a new phase with a two-week temporary ceasefire declared on April 7. However, the high-level talks held in Islamabad are facing serious obstacles due to the uncompromising stances of the parties and deep-seated mistrust.
Key Deadlocks and Obstacles in the Negotiations
The face-to-face negotiations held in Islamabad, attended by a US delegation led by Vice President JD Vance and Iranian diplomats, represent the most senior direct contact to end the conflict in decades. Despite this, the gap between the parties remains far from being bridged:
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis: The parties are not backing down on the control of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the most critical items on the agenda. The US is demanding that the Strait be kept completely and freely open, while the Tehran administration is trying to maintain its military gains and its strategic influence over the waterway.
Nuclear and Military Demands: The US administration expects Iran to halt all uranium enrichment activities, surrender its existing weapons-grade uranium stockpiles, and significantly restrict its ballistic missile program. Furthermore, cutting support for proxy militia groups in the region is among Washington's red lines.
Accusations of Bad Faith: Even before sitting at the negotiating table, both sides accused each other of "bad faith." Iran rejected the US demands, labeling them as "excessive," while the US side harbors deep suspicions regarding the transparency of the security architecture under Iran's new leadership.
Geopolitical Context and Internal Political Dynamics
The current course of the conflict is increasing internal pressures on both Washington and Tehran. While the US administration faces the costs of the conflict and its impact on global energy markets, the diplomatic flexibility of the Mojtaba Khamenei administration in Iran is being questioned due to its close ties with military cadres.
On the other hand, although President Donald Trump's announcement that mines in the Strait of Hormuz have begun to be cleared is a sign of limited softening on the ground, it is observed that no progress has yet been made on the fundamental conditions required to reach a permanent peace agreement at the diplomatic table.
Expectations and Conclusion
The negotiations in Islamabad serve as a test to determine whether the temporary ceasefire that began on April 7 can be crowned with a more permanent solution. The current picture shows that both sides are looking for an "exit ramp" from the conflict, but they remain quite resistant to making the concessions necessary for reconciliation. Although diplomatic channels remain open, the persistent, deep-seated disagreements continue to increase the fragility of the ceasefire.
#MoonGirl