Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just realized something interesting about the timing here. Warren Buffett officially stepped down as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway this week after literally six decades running the $1 trillion conglomerate. At 94, he's handing operational control to Greg Abel while staying on as chairman. But what caught my attention was how his exit kind of marks the end of an era—and I mean specifically his era of being the most vocal skeptic of cryptocurrency in the traditional finance world.
The guy's Bitcoin takes were legendary, honestly. Back in 2018, Buffett called Bitcoin 'rat poison squared' during Berkshire's annual meeting in Omaha. This wasn't even his first shot at it—he'd already called it 'rat poison' back in 2014. But 'rat poison squared'? That one stuck. He was basically saying the whole thing was doubly toxic because it had zero intrinsic value and was pure speculation. Bitcoin was trading around $9,000 at that time after crashing from nearly $20,000 just months before.
Then in 2022, he really doubled down. At the shareholder meeting, Buffett told thousands of investors he wouldn't even pay $25 for all the Bitcoin in existence. His logic was pretty straightforward—if someone handed him all the cryptocurrency in the world, what would he actually do with it? He'd just have to sell it back. He contrasted this with real assets like farmland or apartment buildings that actually generate income and cash flow. The core point was simple: assets need to deliver value to somebody. He even pulled out a $20 bill and said that's what real money looks like.
His late partner Charlie Munger was just as harsh. Called cryptocurrency 'disgusting and contrary to civilization.' Later described it as a 'turd.' These weren't subtle takes—the Berkshire leadership made it crystal clear they saw the entire crypto space as fundamentally flawed.
What's interesting is that Buffett's entire 60-year track record was built on exactly the opposite philosophy. He took over Berkshire when it was a failing textile mill in 1962 at $7.60 per share and turned it into this massive conglomerate. Class A shares now trade above $750,000. His personal fortune sits around $150 billion, built almost entirely on Berkshire stock, even after giving away over $60 billion to charity.
So as this legendary investor hands over the reins, you're basically looking at the end of that particular era where the most respected figure in traditional finance was also the most vocal cryptocurrency skeptic. Whether that changes the narrative around digital assets or not remains to be seen. But the timing of his exit and the broader market evolution in crypto is definitely worth watching.