I've seen through this version of the airdrop after paying so much tuition, so to speak.



Retail investors like to see token locks?
Projects take locking to the extreme—team locks, investor locks, locked for at least a year minimum. On the surface, the chips are as stable as they come.

But the actual circulating chips, the ones that can truly dump the price, were never on the table from the start.

First comes Sybil attacks, then rat-holing by insiders to dump. The project team is the real "liquidity provider" this round.

Before the airdrop, another round of ads—some cash plus tokens, paired with season two's "don't leave, fellow neighbor" narrative. Anyone with emotions who doesn't sell gets left holding the bags at the peak🙃.

Most people's logic is:
High token concentration + Low valuation = Safe buying opportunity

But the market's answer is:
High concentration just means you're the final baghodler in the chain.

As for price support?
Once the chips have been transferred, supporting the price becomes pointless.

S2 is more about extending the narrative cycle rather than changing the outcome. Starting a fresh project is the optimal move.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin