The current period is much more than a simple correction in the cryptocurrency universe. The ongoing crypto bear market marks a major turning point to distinguish serious projects from speculative initiatives. At the Mainnet conference organized by Messari, this reality was confirmed: participants discussed less about quick returns and more about technological and strategic fundamentals.
Why this bearish cycle redefines the industry
Contrary to appearances, contraction cycles provide a welcome respite for true builders in the sector. Freed from the constant pressure of chasing users and deposits, founders can finally focus on sustainable development. This dynamic is clearly observed between two major events: CoinDesk’s Consensus in June, which benefited from unprecedented speculative euphoria, and Mainnet, reflecting an industry entering a phase of thoughtful consolidation. The difference lies not in the quality of exchanges but in the very nature of priorities.
Leading technological priorities
Currently, two main strategic axes shape the discussion. First, optimizing capital efficiency in decentralized finance (DeFi) and on-chain services: how to achieve more leverage or liquidity while reducing collateral requirements? This technical question will become a decisive competitive advantage in the coming years, even though it may also lead to excesses and failures.
Second, a complete overhaul of user interfaces remains a top priority. Crypto applications suffer from chronic complexity, and major security issues remain partially unresolved. The recent massive hacks this year have strongly reminded us of this. A bear market offers the opportunity to build robust systems without rushing, rather than perpetuating existing vulnerabilities.
The funding environment: selective and concentrated
Venture capital continues to flow, but in radically transformed ways. While speculation has vanished—both among active traders and small investors—venture funds are positioning themselves differently. A founder who recently raised capital confided that, during this contraction, the best players are directing their bets toward a very limited number of entities. Venture capitalists still believe in the long-term potential of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, but they are exercising unprecedented selectivity compared to the previous year.
The fragility of the user base: where will sustainability come from?
The real challenge of this bear market lies elsewhere: how to regenerate a credible and sustainable bullish cycle? After ten years of sector coverage, this remains a new concern.
During 2020-2022, a critical mass of retail investors was lured by attractive returns. Digital exchanges, NFT creators, and other retail actors heavily invested in advertising and media appearances. The result? The retail market was deeply damaged by the bursting of speculative bubbles or, worse, by the collapse of faulty or outright fraudulent platforms.
Navigating between whales, active traders, and newcomers
The internal structure of the crypto sector is still dominated by three categories of actors. Large-cap whales, active traders (“day-trading degenerates”), and ordinary users pursue diverging goals. The first two generate significant and rapid returns, but they are also highly mobile capital: ready and able to transfer all their assets to the next promising system for a few basis points of annual yield.
More fundamentally, whales and active traders act as speculative liquidity providers, not true users. To reduce the sector’s extreme cyclicality, crypto projects must identify concrete applications where they outperform existing traditional services.
Real use cases: still limited but promising
To date, obvious applications remain limited: cross-border payments are relevant for Bitcoin, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) for Ethereum, and more marginally, video games—where the market is huge but real technical advantages remain to be proven. Other services and products aimed at end-users are gradually emerging, but many require technological advances: increased throughput, improved interfaces, reduced costs.
This contracted period paradoxically offers the advantage of testing genuine demand for products that provide real added value. This is precisely the mission for entrepreneurs in the blockchain sector today.
Signals of increasing institutional adoption
Alongside these changes, some developments deserve attention. The Walton family (known for their Walmart empire) is reportedly exploring decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). Meanwhile, a major layer-two blockchain company is preparing to announce a significant fundraising round. These movements suggest that, despite the current contraction in the crypto bear market, institutional interest remains—simply changing form and scale.
The sector’s trajectory will depend on builders’ ability to turn this consolidation period into a solid foundation for the next cycle.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Strategic Opportunities in a Bearish Crypto Market
The current period is much more than a simple correction in the cryptocurrency universe. The ongoing crypto bear market marks a major turning point to distinguish serious projects from speculative initiatives. At the Mainnet conference organized by Messari, this reality was confirmed: participants discussed less about quick returns and more about technological and strategic fundamentals.
Why this bearish cycle redefines the industry
Contrary to appearances, contraction cycles provide a welcome respite for true builders in the sector. Freed from the constant pressure of chasing users and deposits, founders can finally focus on sustainable development. This dynamic is clearly observed between two major events: CoinDesk’s Consensus in June, which benefited from unprecedented speculative euphoria, and Mainnet, reflecting an industry entering a phase of thoughtful consolidation. The difference lies not in the quality of exchanges but in the very nature of priorities.
Leading technological priorities
Currently, two main strategic axes shape the discussion. First, optimizing capital efficiency in decentralized finance (DeFi) and on-chain services: how to achieve more leverage or liquidity while reducing collateral requirements? This technical question will become a decisive competitive advantage in the coming years, even though it may also lead to excesses and failures.
Second, a complete overhaul of user interfaces remains a top priority. Crypto applications suffer from chronic complexity, and major security issues remain partially unresolved. The recent massive hacks this year have strongly reminded us of this. A bear market offers the opportunity to build robust systems without rushing, rather than perpetuating existing vulnerabilities.
The funding environment: selective and concentrated
Venture capital continues to flow, but in radically transformed ways. While speculation has vanished—both among active traders and small investors—venture funds are positioning themselves differently. A founder who recently raised capital confided that, during this contraction, the best players are directing their bets toward a very limited number of entities. Venture capitalists still believe in the long-term potential of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, but they are exercising unprecedented selectivity compared to the previous year.
The fragility of the user base: where will sustainability come from?
The real challenge of this bear market lies elsewhere: how to regenerate a credible and sustainable bullish cycle? After ten years of sector coverage, this remains a new concern.
During 2020-2022, a critical mass of retail investors was lured by attractive returns. Digital exchanges, NFT creators, and other retail actors heavily invested in advertising and media appearances. The result? The retail market was deeply damaged by the bursting of speculative bubbles or, worse, by the collapse of faulty or outright fraudulent platforms.
Navigating between whales, active traders, and newcomers
The internal structure of the crypto sector is still dominated by three categories of actors. Large-cap whales, active traders (“day-trading degenerates”), and ordinary users pursue diverging goals. The first two generate significant and rapid returns, but they are also highly mobile capital: ready and able to transfer all their assets to the next promising system for a few basis points of annual yield.
More fundamentally, whales and active traders act as speculative liquidity providers, not true users. To reduce the sector’s extreme cyclicality, crypto projects must identify concrete applications where they outperform existing traditional services.
Real use cases: still limited but promising
To date, obvious applications remain limited: cross-border payments are relevant for Bitcoin, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) for Ethereum, and more marginally, video games—where the market is huge but real technical advantages remain to be proven. Other services and products aimed at end-users are gradually emerging, but many require technological advances: increased throughput, improved interfaces, reduced costs.
This contracted period paradoxically offers the advantage of testing genuine demand for products that provide real added value. This is precisely the mission for entrepreneurs in the blockchain sector today.
Signals of increasing institutional adoption
Alongside these changes, some developments deserve attention. The Walton family (known for their Walmart empire) is reportedly exploring decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). Meanwhile, a major layer-two blockchain company is preparing to announce a significant fundraising round. These movements suggest that, despite the current contraction in the crypto bear market, institutional interest remains—simply changing form and scale.
The sector’s trajectory will depend on builders’ ability to turn this consolidation period into a solid foundation for the next cycle.