Interesting! The "trademark battle" farce in the AI circle,


ended with OpenAI "picking up the scraps." 😈
OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot) was originally named after Anthropic's Claude model,
it was supposed to be a mutually beneficial opportunity—project teams leverage promotion, and Anthropic could also benefit from community feedback.
But Anthropic chose to pursue legal action,
which instead pushed founder Peter Steinberger into OpenAI's arms.
Anthropic's shortsightedness:
As a result, they not only failed to secure a partnership but also became a "negative example" criticized by the community.
The higher the "walls" between AI companies, the easier it is to stifle innovation.
The future norm in the AI industry: technical geniuses and projects are often mobile; whoever can provide better platforms and resources wins.
Anthropic may regret it, but in the fiercely competitive AI race, this "zero-sum game" mentality could backfire.
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)