Mars Finance reports that Matrixport’s analysis indicates the inflow of funds into Bitcoin ETFs has significantly slowed down, primarily due to the narrowing of the market basis. The report points out that retail participation remains subdued, and trading volume data from the South Korean crypto market shows that retail buying demand is not prominent. Due to the lack of incremental buying support, the funding rate for perpetual contracts has remained low for a long time, which compresses the profit potential of basis trading (cash-and-carry arbitrage), thereby limiting the inflow of incremental funds into Bitcoin ETFs. Analysts believe this confirms the March 2024 assessment: without retail-driven spot-futures spread movement, institutional capital allocation cannot accelerate, leading to an extended consolidation phase.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Bitcoin ETF capital inflow slows down, with the main reason being the narrowing of the basis
Mars Finance reports that Matrixport’s analysis indicates the inflow of funds into Bitcoin ETFs has significantly slowed down, primarily due to the narrowing of the market basis. The report points out that retail participation remains subdued, and trading volume data from the South Korean crypto market shows that retail buying demand is not prominent. Due to the lack of incremental buying support, the funding rate for perpetual contracts has remained low for a long time, which compresses the profit potential of basis trading (cash-and-carry arbitrage), thereby limiting the inflow of incremental funds into Bitcoin ETFs. Analysts believe this confirms the March 2024 assessment: without retail-driven spot-futures spread movement, institutional capital allocation cannot accelerate, leading to an extended consolidation phase.