The cryptocurrency industry in 2025 delivered a masterclass in organized chaos—a year where hackers lost their own loot, founders staged elaborate hoaxes, and billion-dollar mistakes unfolded in mere minutes. Through these bizarre incidents involving hackers, meme coins, and increasingly surreal events, the crypto ecosystem revealed itself as part high-stakes drama, part comedy sketch, and part experimental laboratory for human decision-making gone wrong.
The Hacker’s Ultimate Irony: Stealing 2,930 ETH, Then Losing It All to Phishing
In February, zkLend suffered a security breach that seemed routine by industry standards. But the aftermath became anything but ordinary. By April, the hacker who initially stole the funds accidentally clicked a phishing link while attempting to clean their digital tracks through Tornado Cash. The result? All 2,930 ETH—reportedly worth millions—vanished into the void.
The irony was palpable: a sophisticated operator skilled enough to breach zkLend’s security became a victim of basic phishing tactics. The hacker subsequently reached out to zkLend with an on-chain message admitting the catastrophic blunder, claiming ignorance and requesting help recovering the stolen assets. Security researchers discovered the malicious site had been operational for over five years, suggesting the hacker fell victim to a long-established scheme. zkLend initiated tracking efforts across centralized exchanges and cooperated with authorities, but the lesson remained clear—in crypto, no one is safe from their own mistakes.
The TGE Founder Vanishing Act: Missing Person or Marketing Genius?
In February, community members of the TGE project faced an unusual situation: their founder Harold had disappeared while in Myanmar and reportedly lost his multisignature wallet—the very keys needed to unlock the project’s treasury. The timing raised eyebrows within the ecosystem.
Yet despite Harold’s absence and the missing wallet, the project announced that $DIN token issuance would proceed uninterrupted. The narrative sounded implausible to skeptics: how could a project continue launching when its founder had vanished and critical security infrastructure was compromised? Some observers suspected calculated opportunism—a disappearance engineered to generate buzz. Others believed the setup simply reflected the multi-signature system’s intended design: distribute control enough that no single person’s absence derails operations.
The Meme Token That Surged on a Fake Death: Zerebro’s Exit Strategy
May brought the year’s most theatrical moment. A video clip emerged showing Zerebro co-founder Jeffy Yu apparently committing suicide during a livestream. The incident initially registered as another provocative developer stunt, similar to those seen on Pump.Fun—meme coin chaos as performance art.
Then an obituary appeared. The connected dots triggered speculation, and the associated meme token LLJEFFY experienced explosive growth, briefly climbing past $30 million in market capitalization. But within hours, KOLs exposed the truth: Jeffy Yu had orchestrated an elaborate “fake death exit strategy,” sending detailed letters to early investors explaining his calculated disappearance as the “only way” to prevent token price collapse amid personal harassment and online hate.
This marked cryptocurrency’s first documented “fake death exit”—a new category of scam where the creator fakes their own demise to shield the project’s asset value. The audacity of the scheme became a defining moment in crypto’s theatrical absurdity.
Double Identity Exposed: The Embezzler Recognized at Conference
Clanker, an AI token platform operating on the Base network, terminated its partnership with core developer proxystudio in May after discovering the developer’s troubling history. But the real twist involved identity: proxystudio was actually Gabagool.eth, a figure known for conducting on-chain investigations and claiming expertise in DeFi security.
The same person had previously abused his position at Velodrome in 2022, embezzling approximately $350,000 before community pressure forced restitution. What made this revelation particularly absurd wasn’t blockchain forensics—it was analog recognition. At an offline FarCon event, Aerodrome founder Alex Cutler spotted Gabagool and immediately recognized proxystudio. The meme token space had finally been caught by old-fashioned face-to-face identification rather than sophisticated on-chain analysis.
The Bitcoin Wallet That Drains Itself: Alby’s Controversial Policy
June brought a different kind of concern. Lightning Network users reported their Alby wallet balances mysteriously disappearing. Investigation revealed a terms-of-service update from March 2025 stipulating an extraordinary policy: the platform reserved the right to completely zero out account balances after 12 consecutive months of inactivity.
The move transformed Alby’s proposition from “Bitcoin wallet” to something far less appealing. Users who’d set up accounts and forgotten about them watched their holdings evaporate. It represented a peculiar inversion of blockchain ideals—the promise of self-custody morphing into unilateral asset seizure. Alby had essentially redefined what a wallet meant.
When Mistakes Cost More Than Global GDP: Paxos’s 22-Minute Incident
October delivered perhaps the most surreal event of the year. Paxos, a stablecoin issuer, accidentally minted 300 trillion PYUSD tokens—theoretically worth $300 trillion at the 1:1 USD peg. According to the International Monetary Fund, this figure exceeds twice the combined GDP of every country on Earth.
The company discovered the error and burned all tokens within 22 minutes. While the incident never reached blockchain settlement (crisis averted), it illustrated how fragile systems underlying digital assets truly are. A single software bug could theoretically have created more value than human civilization has generated across history. That it happened so quickly—and got resolved so quietly—only amplified the underlying terror.
Market Manipulation Through Art: The Candlestick Chart Gallery
As quantitative trading struggled to keep pace with altcoin madness, market manipulation evolved into performance art. Screenshots emerged showing candlestick charts bearing no resemblance to reality—lines drawn with the precision of abstract painters rather than the mathematics of price discovery. Altcoin manipulators had essentially abandoned pretense and simply sketched price action as fiction.
Eclipse: From Harvard Study to “We Have Zero Users”
The Eclipse project spent months embroiled in scandals ranging from founder sexual assault allegations to leadership turnover. The team announced participation in a Harvard University-led 36-month sociological study, framing their turmoil as legitimate research.
Then in a stunning about-face, Eclipse’s official account bluntly posted: “We have no users.” The contradiction was breathtaking—a project that had claimed to be Harvard’s research subject suddenly admitting complete market failure. The study, it appeared, had concluded not with breakthrough findings but with naked admission of irrelevance.
MELANIA: When Politics Meets Meme Tokens
The absurdity reached its crescendo when Trump’s wife launched the MELANIA token in the hours following her husband’s crypto project announcement. The token required no innovation, community building, or utility—just a celebrity name plastered onto blockchain infrastructure.
If the cryptocurrency industry maintained a hall of shame, MELANIA’s place at the top would be secured. It symbolized the complete divorce between the original blockchain vision and the current reality: financial systems where celebrity endorsement alone justifies asset creation, where political figures treat tokens as merchandise, and where the “innovation” of 2025 consisted entirely of slapping famous names onto primitive smart contracts.
The Year Cryptocurrency Became Its Own Parody
Looking back across 2025, the common thread connecting hackers losing stolen money, founders faking deaths, wallets auto-zeroing balances, and politicians launching meme tokens wasn’t incompetence—it was inevitability. The cryptocurrency ecosystem had evolved into a self-contained carnival where every participant played multiple roles: creator and scammer, security expert and phishing victim, researcher and charlatan.
These stories persist not as warnings but as commemorations. They document how the industry’s participants—hackers, developers, traders, and ordinary users alike—managed to survive the chaos while simultaneously creating it. In this experimental field, this casino, this amusement park, somehow we’ve made it to another year, stranger and more absurd than the last.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
2025's Wildest Cryptocurrency Chaos: When Hackers Become Victims and Meme Tokens Peak Absurdity
The cryptocurrency industry in 2025 delivered a masterclass in organized chaos—a year where hackers lost their own loot, founders staged elaborate hoaxes, and billion-dollar mistakes unfolded in mere minutes. Through these bizarre incidents involving hackers, meme coins, and increasingly surreal events, the crypto ecosystem revealed itself as part high-stakes drama, part comedy sketch, and part experimental laboratory for human decision-making gone wrong.
The Hacker’s Ultimate Irony: Stealing 2,930 ETH, Then Losing It All to Phishing
In February, zkLend suffered a security breach that seemed routine by industry standards. But the aftermath became anything but ordinary. By April, the hacker who initially stole the funds accidentally clicked a phishing link while attempting to clean their digital tracks through Tornado Cash. The result? All 2,930 ETH—reportedly worth millions—vanished into the void.
The irony was palpable: a sophisticated operator skilled enough to breach zkLend’s security became a victim of basic phishing tactics. The hacker subsequently reached out to zkLend with an on-chain message admitting the catastrophic blunder, claiming ignorance and requesting help recovering the stolen assets. Security researchers discovered the malicious site had been operational for over five years, suggesting the hacker fell victim to a long-established scheme. zkLend initiated tracking efforts across centralized exchanges and cooperated with authorities, but the lesson remained clear—in crypto, no one is safe from their own mistakes.
The TGE Founder Vanishing Act: Missing Person or Marketing Genius?
In February, community members of the TGE project faced an unusual situation: their founder Harold had disappeared while in Myanmar and reportedly lost his multisignature wallet—the very keys needed to unlock the project’s treasury. The timing raised eyebrows within the ecosystem.
Yet despite Harold’s absence and the missing wallet, the project announced that $DIN token issuance would proceed uninterrupted. The narrative sounded implausible to skeptics: how could a project continue launching when its founder had vanished and critical security infrastructure was compromised? Some observers suspected calculated opportunism—a disappearance engineered to generate buzz. Others believed the setup simply reflected the multi-signature system’s intended design: distribute control enough that no single person’s absence derails operations.
The Meme Token That Surged on a Fake Death: Zerebro’s Exit Strategy
May brought the year’s most theatrical moment. A video clip emerged showing Zerebro co-founder Jeffy Yu apparently committing suicide during a livestream. The incident initially registered as another provocative developer stunt, similar to those seen on Pump.Fun—meme coin chaos as performance art.
Then an obituary appeared. The connected dots triggered speculation, and the associated meme token LLJEFFY experienced explosive growth, briefly climbing past $30 million in market capitalization. But within hours, KOLs exposed the truth: Jeffy Yu had orchestrated an elaborate “fake death exit strategy,” sending detailed letters to early investors explaining his calculated disappearance as the “only way” to prevent token price collapse amid personal harassment and online hate.
This marked cryptocurrency’s first documented “fake death exit”—a new category of scam where the creator fakes their own demise to shield the project’s asset value. The audacity of the scheme became a defining moment in crypto’s theatrical absurdity.
Double Identity Exposed: The Embezzler Recognized at Conference
Clanker, an AI token platform operating on the Base network, terminated its partnership with core developer proxystudio in May after discovering the developer’s troubling history. But the real twist involved identity: proxystudio was actually Gabagool.eth, a figure known for conducting on-chain investigations and claiming expertise in DeFi security.
The same person had previously abused his position at Velodrome in 2022, embezzling approximately $350,000 before community pressure forced restitution. What made this revelation particularly absurd wasn’t blockchain forensics—it was analog recognition. At an offline FarCon event, Aerodrome founder Alex Cutler spotted Gabagool and immediately recognized proxystudio. The meme token space had finally been caught by old-fashioned face-to-face identification rather than sophisticated on-chain analysis.
The Bitcoin Wallet That Drains Itself: Alby’s Controversial Policy
June brought a different kind of concern. Lightning Network users reported their Alby wallet balances mysteriously disappearing. Investigation revealed a terms-of-service update from March 2025 stipulating an extraordinary policy: the platform reserved the right to completely zero out account balances after 12 consecutive months of inactivity.
The move transformed Alby’s proposition from “Bitcoin wallet” to something far less appealing. Users who’d set up accounts and forgotten about them watched their holdings evaporate. It represented a peculiar inversion of blockchain ideals—the promise of self-custody morphing into unilateral asset seizure. Alby had essentially redefined what a wallet meant.
When Mistakes Cost More Than Global GDP: Paxos’s 22-Minute Incident
October delivered perhaps the most surreal event of the year. Paxos, a stablecoin issuer, accidentally minted 300 trillion PYUSD tokens—theoretically worth $300 trillion at the 1:1 USD peg. According to the International Monetary Fund, this figure exceeds twice the combined GDP of every country on Earth.
The company discovered the error and burned all tokens within 22 minutes. While the incident never reached blockchain settlement (crisis averted), it illustrated how fragile systems underlying digital assets truly are. A single software bug could theoretically have created more value than human civilization has generated across history. That it happened so quickly—and got resolved so quietly—only amplified the underlying terror.
Market Manipulation Through Art: The Candlestick Chart Gallery
As quantitative trading struggled to keep pace with altcoin madness, market manipulation evolved into performance art. Screenshots emerged showing candlestick charts bearing no resemblance to reality—lines drawn with the precision of abstract painters rather than the mathematics of price discovery. Altcoin manipulators had essentially abandoned pretense and simply sketched price action as fiction.
Eclipse: From Harvard Study to “We Have Zero Users”
The Eclipse project spent months embroiled in scandals ranging from founder sexual assault allegations to leadership turnover. The team announced participation in a Harvard University-led 36-month sociological study, framing their turmoil as legitimate research.
Then in a stunning about-face, Eclipse’s official account bluntly posted: “We have no users.” The contradiction was breathtaking—a project that had claimed to be Harvard’s research subject suddenly admitting complete market failure. The study, it appeared, had concluded not with breakthrough findings but with naked admission of irrelevance.
MELANIA: When Politics Meets Meme Tokens
The absurdity reached its crescendo when Trump’s wife launched the MELANIA token in the hours following her husband’s crypto project announcement. The token required no innovation, community building, or utility—just a celebrity name plastered onto blockchain infrastructure.
If the cryptocurrency industry maintained a hall of shame, MELANIA’s place at the top would be secured. It symbolized the complete divorce between the original blockchain vision and the current reality: financial systems where celebrity endorsement alone justifies asset creation, where political figures treat tokens as merchandise, and where the “innovation” of 2025 consisted entirely of slapping famous names onto primitive smart contracts.
The Year Cryptocurrency Became Its Own Parody
Looking back across 2025, the common thread connecting hackers losing stolen money, founders faking deaths, wallets auto-zeroing balances, and politicians launching meme tokens wasn’t incompetence—it was inevitability. The cryptocurrency ecosystem had evolved into a self-contained carnival where every participant played multiple roles: creator and scammer, security expert and phishing victim, researcher and charlatan.
These stories persist not as warnings but as commemorations. They document how the industry’s participants—hackers, developers, traders, and ordinary users alike—managed to survive the chaos while simultaneously creating it. In this experimental field, this casino, this amusement park, somehow we’ve made it to another year, stranger and more absurd than the last.