【Crypto World】An emerging cryptocurrency project’s public token sale has achieved impressive results—raising over $20 million, far surpassing the soft cap target of $2.5 million. The token is priced at $0.069, valuing the project at nearly $69 million.
In terms of token distribution, the team received 19.6% of the total supply. Interestingly, the project team was not greedy and returned the excess funds—$7.3 million—back to investors, with plans to use the funds for liquidity building and technical development.
However, community voices are beginning to show disagreement. On Twitter and forums, some compare this fundraising approach to the tactics used by previously controversial projects, especially referencing the Trove Markets incident. The main concerns focus on several areas: whether the founder’s background is credible, whether marketing claims are exaggerated, and the fairness of the token allocation structure. Such doubts are common in Web3 fundraising and also reflect investors’ ongoing attention to project transparency.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-3824aa38
· 2h ago
Wait, something doesn't seem right about returning $7.3 million... Is it really for fairness or is there another motive?
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 2h ago
Returning 7.3 million sounds quite considerate, but honestly, I've seen this kind of operation too many times before. Let's just make a good first impression...
View OriginalReply0
BagHolderTillRetire
· 2h ago
7.3 million returned? I've seen this trick before... It's always about luring people in first.
View OriginalReply0
ShortingEnthusiast
· 3h ago
The team's proactive refund strategy is indeed effective, but just look at what happened with Trove—you never know what’s behind impressive data.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezer
· 3h ago
Haha, it's the same old trick... The team takes 19.6% and still pretends to be generous by refunding money. Is that true?
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteran
· 3h ago
Returning funds sounds great, but why does this approach look so familiar? Is it the same old Trove method?
Financing exceeds expectations but sparks controversy? The token allocation model of this project faces community criticism
【Crypto World】An emerging cryptocurrency project’s public token sale has achieved impressive results—raising over $20 million, far surpassing the soft cap target of $2.5 million. The token is priced at $0.069, valuing the project at nearly $69 million.
In terms of token distribution, the team received 19.6% of the total supply. Interestingly, the project team was not greedy and returned the excess funds—$7.3 million—back to investors, with plans to use the funds for liquidity building and technical development.
However, community voices are beginning to show disagreement. On Twitter and forums, some compare this fundraising approach to the tactics used by previously controversial projects, especially referencing the Trove Markets incident. The main concerns focus on several areas: whether the founder’s background is credible, whether marketing claims are exaggerated, and the fairness of the token allocation structure. Such doubts are common in Web3 fundraising and also reflect investors’ ongoing attention to project transparency.