2026-01-22 11:15:41

Since an invitation has already been sent out, I still need to responsibly remind friends who are participating. Recently, the project has started charging fees, which is the key— the cost of earning points has become quite outrageous. Compared to the initial participants, the current costs have increased by many times, and this is not a small difference.

I suggest everyone calculate the actual cost structure using their own trading volume data. We won't comment much on the project itself; after all, the initial appeal was there. But the reality is, the participation mechanism and cost structure are changing.

To be honest, those who want to participate should calculate their expenses in advance. Don't find out later that the costs are no longer at the original level. This is a reminder and also a piece of advice.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SelfMadeRuggee

· 01-25 11:14

Wait, the transaction fee doubled directly? That's outrageous. Early entrants made a killing, while later ones are all just newbies, such a typical scam. I just want to ask how much the cost has actually increased, has anyone calculated it? It's a bit awkward to be discouraging the previous invitees, haha. Rather than calculating the costs, it's better to just withdraw. Anyway, when the transaction fee for this kind of project increases, it's time to run.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 01-24 05:04

Damn, the transaction fee doubled? That's outrageous, early entrants are making a killing. --- Another project starting to cut in after entry, classic move. --- Here we go again, that same pattern: free recruitment early on, then start cutting the leeks later. --- I calculated it myself, the cost is directly five times higher, truly incredible. --- Good reminder, don't say I didn't warn you, these fee rates are ridiculously high. --- Those who entered early are laughing to death, latecomers are crying, same old story. --- It’s always like this, dazzling promises at the start, then straight to cutting. --- When the transaction fee skyrockets, the value of participation is gone.

View OriginalReply0

SolidityJester

· 01-23 20:51

It's starting to charge again, I've seen this trick many times. Those who got in early are laughing early, now those who come in later are losing big. --- Once the fees increase, the entire market changes flavor, it's really outrageous. --- Yeah, doubling costs is no surprise anymore, calculate carefully before you invest. --- That's why I never follow the trend, wait until the fees stabilize before talking. --- Ha, it's the same old story, project teams always love to play this way. --- When the cost structure changes, you can tell who is holding the bag. --- Those who got in early are earning passively, latecomers are the big losers. This game is not interesting. --- I suggest everyone do the math carefully, so you don't get cut too badly.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuilder

· 01-23 18:57

Transaction fees increase, and this wave will be over. Doubling costs, what are you still playing at? --- Those who got in early have already made a fortune; those taking over now are being exploited for their gains. --- It's the same old story. Project teams always like to start sweet and end bitter. --- I just want to know how much loss is acceptable now to break even. If I can't figure it out, I won't touch it. --- This is the usual operation in Web3: attract first, then cut the leeks. --- Doubling costs and still daring to ask for accounts—why not just say "don't come" directly? --- It looks like a money-making scheme. As long as you can get out, it's fine.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichDetector

· 01-22 11:45

Oops, when the transaction fee increases, the cost just skyrockets, and early supporters are several orders of magnitude ahead of later entrants. --- Forget it, these project routines are all the same, initially attractive enough to now cut the leeks. --- Wait, the cost is so many times higher? Let me calculate if it's still worth continuing to play. --- Really, only invest when you're confident in the ledger, don't get caught off guard by being cut. --- Once the transaction fee is collected, it immediately changes flavor, this is just a disguised way of cutting the leeks. --- So now entering the market is basically like giving away money, the difference is just too big. --- Who is still participating? I can tell this is no longer the original thing.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterZhang

· 01-22 11:45

I wish I had known earlier, I haven't seen a project team not resort to shady tactics when it comes to fees. --- Cost doubled? I've seen through this long ago; this trick is worn out. --- I advise you to do the math carefully before investing, don't be blinded by early sweeteners. --- Honestly, the current cost structure is completely different from three months ago; I witnessed it firsthand. --- To be honest, this is a common problem with airdrop projects—attracting users for free early on, then taking a cut later. --- When fees rise, it’s like the game rules have changed; the cost for new entrants is really high. --- I'm just surprised; isn't this always the tactic of project teams... --- You still have to analyze the data yourself to calculate costs; I've already explained everything clearly to you.

View OriginalReply0

StillBuyingTheDip

· 01-22 11:45

Wow, the fact that transaction fees doubled has been obvious for a while, but it's a bit late to just now be warning about it. Once the cost structure changes, the game rules completely change—that's the real killer move. Have you done the math? The fee ratio can be shockingly high. Early entrants make a killing, latecomers suffer huge losses—that's the gap. It's not that the project is bad; it's just that this fee system is really ruthless.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-7b078580

· 01-22 11:23

Data shows that costs have doubled, but this is the fate on the chain... Let's wait and see if it hits a historical low.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationKing

· 01-22 11:18

Damn, the transaction fee has doubled? I made a killing early on with this move. --- It's the same old trick, first sweet, then cut, a common tactic. --- Great, another vampire project. I should have known better than to get involved. --- Calculate the data yourself before jumping in, don't get cut and still not understand what happened. --- That's why I no longer trust any invitation schemes; the tricks are too deep. --- With such high transaction fees, is there any future in this? --- Those who participated early are laughing; everyone else is just paying tuition now.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaBrain

· 01-22 11:17

Damn, the fees are rising so sharply? Early investors are making a killing, but now the cost for new entrants has doubled. Who can handle that? To put it simply, the project team is exploiting the early adopters; once the mechanism changes, the value shifts. You really need to do the math carefully before participating—don't be fooled by the early bird stories. This is a common Web3 tactic: sweet at first, bitter later. When the cost structure changes, it's like the game rules have changed. Everyone, take it easy.

View OriginalReply0