2026-01-22 02:45:28

FightID project team has today provided a quite rare solution. After assessing the market environment, the team decided to issue a full refund to all participants, along with an additional token airdrop as compensation. This means that participants effectively obtained tokens at zero cost, while the project team also effectively reduced the circulating pressure at launch, creating a win-win situation.

Tonight, the project officially launches the TGE (Token Generation Event). According to the roadmap announcement, FightID has passed the review mechanism of a major exchange and completed the relevant listing preparations on a compliant platform. The entire progress is quite clear, from fundraising to token distribution and exchange deployment, with a clear timetable for each stage. This kind of transparency and responsible attitude is indeed rare in the current market.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TheShibaWhisperer

· 7h ago

Get coins at zero cost? This move is a bit outrageous, is it real... But the refund plus airdrop is indeed quite clever.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 7h ago

Get coins at zero cost? I've seen this trick too many times. The key is whether you can hold the price after listing on the exchange.

View OriginalReply0

SeeYouInFourYears

· 7h ago

Zero-cost token farming? This operation is indeed outrageous, but seeing such a clear roadmap actually gives me some confidence.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 7h ago

Zero-cost token acquisition, can the project team still reduce circulation pressure? I've heard this logic too many times, always claiming a win-win situation. Do you not have a clear idea of the outcome in the end... --- Regulatory platforms, leading exchanges, clear timelines—these phrases can fool retail investors for an entire year. I'm just afraid that when the time comes, "compliance" will turn out to be a joke. --- Full refunds + airdropped tokens—it's nice to call it compensation, but frankly, it's just another way to cut. Truly responsible projects should have transparent mechanism design that allows community oversight. Is it like that now? Still too inexperienced. --- A clear roadmap ≠ strong execution. Haven't we learned enough lessons from history? I'm more concerned about the governance rights distribution after TGE, and whether the token distribution plan includes mechanisms to prevent large holders from colluding to dump. --- This kind of "transparent and responsible" talk sounds good, but from an incentive-compatible perspective, why wouldn't the project team dump at launch? Relying solely on reputation? Haha.

View OriginalReply0