The U.S. Supreme Court justices have indicated growing concerns about President Trump's campaign to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. The move centers on unsubstantiated allegations related to mortgage fraud. Legal observers suggest the bench's hesitation signals potential limits on executive overreach in matters involving independent financial institutions. Such tensions between the executive and judiciary underscore broader questions about governance in monetary policy decisions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MerkleDreamervip
· 3h ago
Now it's good. Checks and balances can really work, but when will this act finally come to an end?
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 3h ago
ngl this is what checks and balances look like; the Supreme Court justices haven't completely fallen yet, so it's not bad...
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlertvip
· 3h ago
Oh, finally the court has some backbone and doesn't let the president arbitrarily establish independent agencies.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 3h ago
Bro, this trick is really outrageous. Trying to scam people without any evidence? Even the Supreme Court can't stand it anymore.
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWalletvip
· 3h ago
Are they manipulating the Federal Reserve again? Listen to me, what really matters is the flow of funds behind it. I'm already tired of the unsubstantiated allegations—let's dig into who is actually driving this wave of manipulation.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)