Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
In the decentralized storage space on the Sui chain, one project has captured 90% of the market share on its own, which is quite rare. But this is not a marketing gimmick; it’s a real technological breakthrough.
The key lies in that RedStuff encoding scheme. How do other storage protocols in the Sui ecosystem handle it? Most are based on traditional RS erasure coding, which results in replication factors soaring to 15-20 times, making storage costs prohibitively high, and data retrieval taking over 1 second, completely stalling dynamic applications. In comparison, RedStuff uses XOR operations to reduce the replication factor to 4-5 times, cutting costs by 70%, and data read latency drops to milliseconds. This gap is not a minor optimization but a qualitative leap—no wonder 80% of dynamic applications in the Sui ecosystem choose this scheme, with developers voting with their feet.
Looking at the security design, some storage protocols lower their fault tolerance to cut costs. If more than 30% of nodes go offline, the data recovery success rate drops below 50%, which is essentially gambling on luck. RedStuff’s encoding is impressive because even if two-thirds of the slices are lost, it can still recover data 100%. This redundancy design is crucial for applications handling fund transfers, where data loss means direct financial loss, leaving no room for error.
Once the technical barrier is built, it’s hard to be overturned. The current leading position of this project is ultimately earned through hardcore engineering capabilities.
However, I'm concerned about how long this technology can hold up, what if someone develops a more aggressive coding solution.
By the way, the winner-take-all scenario in the Sui ecosystem is a bit risky; once the centralization risk is exposed, it's game over.
This security design is indeed impressive; losing two-thirds of the data can still be recovered, which is more conscientious than protocols that only pursue low cost.
It seems that's why some projects can't break through no matter how hard they try—once the technical gap is formed, it's very hard to catch up.