Gold surged directly to a historic high of $4760 after Trump's remarks, indicating that global risk aversion has indeed reached its peak. But interestingly, Bitcoin didn't benefit from this — instead, it broke below 90k and was heavily hammered as a risk asset.
This really highlights the issue. During a major capital shift, traditional safe-haven assets (gold) and digital assets (Bitcoin) moved in opposite directions. One is seen as insurance, the other as a gamble — how can both appear simultaneously in a macro-turbulent environment?
The question now is: Is this decline a normal market correction or a deeper risk signal? Especially when gold is hitting new highs, Bitcoin's performance does seem somewhat surprising. The macro disconnect is becoming more and more obvious. Can BTC still live up to the title of "digital gold"? Right now, it looks a bit uncertain.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GameFiCritic
· 1h ago
That's the problem. BTC hasn't even stabilized in the position of "digital gold," and its volatility directly exposes the truth.
It seems that the definition of safe-haven assets needs to be redefined. Gold is being drained, while BTC is bleeding. The stark difference indicates that the market's trust in digital assets is still lacking.
Wait, does this mean that the on-chain ecosystem's support is still insufficient? Purely speculating on prices, and the macro movements reveal the true nature.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 13h ago
Gold reaching 4760 is truly outrageous, but BTC dropping below 90k is just hilarious. How can this still be called digital gold? Haha
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 13h ago
ngl the correlation flip is actually wild... gold hitting ATH while btc dumps below 90k? that's statistically significant divergence right there. contrary to popular belief, "digital gold" narrative just got stress-tested and frankly, it's showing cracks. risk-adjusted returns looking pretty sus rn tbh
Reply0
SneakyFlashloan
· 13h ago
Gold hits a new high while BTC drops below 90k, this disconnect is indeed outrageous... Looks like the crypto world still needs to prove itself further.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBot
· 13h ago
Gold hits 4760, the crypto market is still getting hammered. This contrast is truly remarkable, feels like institutions are quietly rebalancing their portfolios.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxiety
· 14h ago
Gold hits a new high while BTC drops below 90k, this split is quite intense... Could it be that the nickname "digital gold" is really just a dream?
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 14h ago
Gold has risen to 4760, which is truly crazy, but BTC is still getting hammered... This is just unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTears
· 14h ago
Gold hits a new high of 4760, while BTC breaks below 90k. This contrast is truly remarkable... It seems we need to reevaluate the positioning of "digital gold."
The recent market phenomena are a bit outrageous.
Gold surged directly to a historic high of $4760 after Trump's remarks, indicating that global risk aversion has indeed reached its peak. But interestingly, Bitcoin didn't benefit from this — instead, it broke below 90k and was heavily hammered as a risk asset.
This really highlights the issue. During a major capital shift, traditional safe-haven assets (gold) and digital assets (Bitcoin) moved in opposite directions. One is seen as insurance, the other as a gamble — how can both appear simultaneously in a macro-turbulent environment?
The question now is: Is this decline a normal market correction or a deeper risk signal? Especially when gold is hitting new highs, Bitcoin's performance does seem somewhat surprising. The macro disconnect is becoming more and more obvious. Can BTC still live up to the title of "digital gold"? Right now, it looks a bit uncertain.