Last week, I noticed Walrus announced a partnership with io.net. Initially, I didn't pay much attention. But upon closer consideration, the potential of this development might be underestimated.



On the io.net side, they operate a decentralized GPU computing market, currently holding over 10,000 GPUs and CPU resources. The process for AI training is as follows: after running the model, the generated datasets and weight files need to be stored. The problem is that computing and storage are originally two separate streams, requiring developers to interface with different service providers, making the process fragmented and inefficient.

Now, Walrus is directly integrated into io.net's paid system, effectively combining computing and storage into an all-in-one solution. Imagine a real scenario: you rent an A100 GPU on io.net to train a model, and once the 20GB weight file is trained, it can be directly stored in Walrus, with storage proof automatically recorded on the Sui chain. When needed, you can retrieve from Walrus, with full integrity and clear data provenance. The entire operation can be done without leaving the platform, providing a seamless user experience.

From a data perspective, Walrus currently has a total capacity of 4,167 TB, utilizing only 26%, which means ample storage reserves capable of handling large AI training files. On the io.net side, GPU utilization remains high, and the user groups on both sides overlap significantly—mostly AI application developers. This partnership isn't just a PR stunt for hype; it's driven by real application scenarios that complement each other.

Regarding token performance, the price hovers around 0.1406, with a recent decline of 11.2%, and a market cap steady at about $221 million. The decline isn't negligible, but compared to strategic collaborations like io.net, short-term fluctuations are less important. The staking amount for nodes remains at around $1.426 million, indicating that long-term players are still confident.

This kind of infrastructure integration is much more interesting than working alone. The AI computing market is right in front of us, and as long as storage can seize this opportunity, future business growth is just a matter of time.
WAL5,89%
IO5,25%
SUI5,68%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
quiet_lurkervip
· 01-23 19:17
Hey, this collaboration logic is quite smooth. The integration of computation and storage indeed addresses the real pain points of developers.

However, it still depends on actual user growth in the future. Having capacity reserves alone is useless.

The stable pledge amount indicates that big players are genuinely optimistic about long-term development. I still prefer to observe for a period of time.

Infrastructure protocols like this are often overestimated, and it's easier for the market to crash when that happens. Let's wait and see for 3-6 months.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpyvip
· 01-23 16:19
Wow, this is true integration—computing and storage combined. The logic is brilliant.

Now I understand why so many developers complain about fragmentation; someone really should put these two together.

But to be honest, a 26% storage utilization looks good, but the real key is whether it can handle large AI files without lagging.

The staking amount remains steady at 1.42 million. Long-term players aren’t fools; they probably sense something.
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAOvip
· 01-20 19:51
Putting these two together really shows some potential; it's not just riding the hype.

Hash power and storage should have been integrated from the start, and now finally someone is doing it.

I'm optimistic about the long term; short-term fluctuations are just noise.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketmanvip
· 01-20 19:29
Wait, integrated computing and storage? This is exactly like opening the launch window. The upper band of the Bollinger Bands has been established, and short-term declines don't affect the momentum of escape velocity at all.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin