The discussion about the threat of quantum computing to blockchain encryption is heating up. Currently, the Bitcoin ($90.58K) and Ethereum ($3.05K) communities face an urgent question: how much time is left before preparation is needed?
Expert Opinions Diverge
Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin has offered a more aggressive assessment, believing that the threat of quantum computing is closer than industry expectations. He estimates that by 2030, there is a 20% chance that quantum computers will be able to crack existing cryptographic systems, a figure sufficient to warrant serious attention.
Casa security chief Jamison Lop takes a relatively optimistic stance. He emphasizes that current quantum computers are far from reaching the level that threatens Bitcoin cryptography. However, Lop also remains vigilant, pointing out that the network must start preparing for the quantum era— a process expected to take several years.
Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Quantitative Fund, holds the most urgent position. He warns that if quantum resistance solutions are not deployed before 2028, Bitcoin could face a “historic bear market.” He believes that even the FTX crisis appears insignificant in comparison.
Current Actual Threats Are Limited, but Preparation Time Is Tight
A recent report from Grayscale Asset Management echoes Lop’s view: although theoretically quantum computers could break modern cryptographic systems, the likelihood of this happening before 2030 is extremely low, and the market does not expect significant impact before 2026.
However, the challenge lies in the technical aspect. Transitioning Bitcoin to a quantum-resistant architecture requires complex protocol design and fund migration. This process—shifting from the current system to a new structure—is expected to take 5 to 10 years. Lop’s advice is pragmatic: “Be optimistic but prepare for the worst.”
The contradiction here is obvious: if the threat truly emerges in mid-2030, and it takes 5-10 years to implement defenses, then the actual window for action the community has is much narrower than initial estimates suggest. Coupled with the uncertainty that quantum research might accelerate, initiating defense preparations now becomes even more urgent— even though the risk is still generally considered medium-term rather than imminent.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Quantum Threat Debate: The Bitcoin Community Faces a Narrowing Time Window Dilemma
The discussion about the threat of quantum computing to blockchain encryption is heating up. Currently, the Bitcoin ($90.58K) and Ethereum ($3.05K) communities face an urgent question: how much time is left before preparation is needed?
Expert Opinions Diverge
Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin has offered a more aggressive assessment, believing that the threat of quantum computing is closer than industry expectations. He estimates that by 2030, there is a 20% chance that quantum computers will be able to crack existing cryptographic systems, a figure sufficient to warrant serious attention.
Casa security chief Jamison Lop takes a relatively optimistic stance. He emphasizes that current quantum computers are far from reaching the level that threatens Bitcoin cryptography. However, Lop also remains vigilant, pointing out that the network must start preparing for the quantum era— a process expected to take several years.
Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Quantitative Fund, holds the most urgent position. He warns that if quantum resistance solutions are not deployed before 2028, Bitcoin could face a “historic bear market.” He believes that even the FTX crisis appears insignificant in comparison.
Current Actual Threats Are Limited, but Preparation Time Is Tight
A recent report from Grayscale Asset Management echoes Lop’s view: although theoretically quantum computers could break modern cryptographic systems, the likelihood of this happening before 2030 is extremely low, and the market does not expect significant impact before 2026.
However, the challenge lies in the technical aspect. Transitioning Bitcoin to a quantum-resistant architecture requires complex protocol design and fund migration. This process—shifting from the current system to a new structure—is expected to take 5 to 10 years. Lop’s advice is pragmatic: “Be optimistic but prepare for the worst.”
The contradiction here is obvious: if the threat truly emerges in mid-2030, and it takes 5-10 years to implement defenses, then the actual window for action the community has is much narrower than initial estimates suggest. Coupled with the uncertainty that quantum research might accelerate, initiating defense preparations now becomes even more urgent— even though the risk is still generally considered medium-term rather than imminent.