2026-01-20 07:30:56

Let me separate two things here. The 24-hour trading model? I'm genuinely neutral about that—it works fine. But here's what bugs me: the blockchain layer feels completely forced onto this ecosystem. Like it's bolted on just to check a box, not because it actually solves anything. That's the real issue worth discussing.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NullWhisperer

· 01-20 08:00

ngl the blockchain layer here feels like cargo cult architecture... bolted on bc someone said "decentralized" not bc it actually needed to exist

Reply0

4am_degen

· 01-20 07:53

The idea that blockchain is just used as filler really hits home for me. I've long felt that many projects treat it as a sticker to stick on top.

View OriginalReply0

Blockchainiac

· 01-20 07:48

Ha, it's that kind of pseudo-demand project again... Using blockchain as a shell to raise funds, right? --- I can accept 24-hour trading, but this layer on the chain is really just hype. --- I understand what you mean, it's Web2 products disguised as blockchain, so annoying. --- Forcing on-chain operations is old news, I really don't see what problems it solves. --- Neutral attitude? I'll just say it: this is just a scam to fleece investors. --- The blockchain part is indeed unnecessary; it feels like just a concept to scam venture capital.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-20 07:43

The blockchain layer is indeed just a decoration, I agree with that. --- 24-hour trading is okay, but that chain layer is really awkward. --- It feels very much like padding, probably just to ride the hype. --- To put it simply, it's fake demand being artificially added, with no real innovation. --- That's the real problem, isn't it? --- It's just a copycat, I see through it. --- A forced fusion product, soulless.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 01-20 07:43

Blockchain here is just a decoration; the collateralization ratio data doesn't support this logic at all. The real risk is that the project team hasn't properly calculated the liquidation threshold and is pushing it hard; when it triggers, it will be a disaster. The 24-hour trading model is still functioning reasonably, but I find the design of the lending positions in this layer of on-chain infrastructure quite alarming. People are still touting the on-chain advantages in the ecosystem, but no matter how fancy the smart contracts are, they can't save false demand. It's like going long with high leverage; initially, the profits look good, but once the leverage is increased, the risk control mechanisms become completely useless.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCry

· 01-20 07:42

Really, blockchain is just a paper tiger. Honestly, it’s of little use. Just throwing blockchain into the mix feels like a way to ride the hype. 24-hour trading is okay, but what about this chain? It hasn't solved any real problems. Just padding numbers, typical pseudo-innovation. Wake up, everyone.

View OriginalReply0