Developers buy back with royalties? That logic is a bit convoluted. Clearly, as the project founder, and having had comment records on GitHub, there should be a more direct way.
To be honest, I find this operation a bit confusing. But since he's positioned at this price level, I've decided to add to my position here.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 3h ago
Honestly, this set of operations is indeed a bit outrageous, it feels like going in circles.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 12h ago
The term "royalty buyback" seems to be trying to hide something. Just say it directly, and it's done.
View OriginalReply0
SlowLearnerWang
· 01-20 07:53
Wait a minute, I need to think more about the royalty buyback logic... I feel like I've been played again.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 01-20 07:51
Follow the trend and add to your position? Fine, since everything's already a mess, I'll play along with you.
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyer
· 01-20 07:50
The rhetoric about royalty buybacks... feels like beating around the bush. Isn't it more complicated to buy directly?
View OriginalReply0
Gm_Gn_Merchant
· 01-20 07:46
The rhetoric about royalty buybacks is truly outrageous, feels like something is being covered up.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 01-20 07:38
Following the trend to add positions? I think you're just betting he won't run away, haha.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLicker
· 01-20 07:34
Following the trend to buy the dip, anyway, if he's willing to spend money, I dare to follow.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecovery
· 01-20 07:33
ngl, the whole "developer buyback via royalties" angle screams classic obfuscation pattern. if dude's actually the founder with github receipts, why the roundabout theater? we've seen this architectural flaw before—inevitable collapse incoming fr
Developers buy back with royalties? That logic is a bit convoluted. Clearly, as the project founder, and having had comment records on GitHub, there should be a more direct way.
To be honest, I find this operation a bit confusing. But since he's positioned at this price level, I've decided to add to my position here.