2026-01-20 06:00:12

#MSCI未来或纳入数字资产财库企业 The loneliest voice in the market is often the first to be heard by smart money.

Recently, discussions about whether MSCI will include digital asset treasury companies have heated up again. Interestingly, some institutional investors have already quietly entered this track. They don't wait for the index confirmation; instead, they set up their positions before confirmation.

The logic is simple—traditional financial indices tend to lag behind market reality. When MSCI finally decides not to exclude a certain asset class, it means a consensus has already formed, and the pricing power has long been shifted.

The direction of digital asset treasury companies has been attracting institutional attention since last year. Regardless of MSCI's stance, these companies are reshaping the logic of corporate asset allocation. Some persist in solitude, while others regret in crowds. The market has always been so cruel and fair.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HodlOrRegret

· 9h ago

Smart money is eating in the dark, and we're still here discussing when MSCI will be included... Wait, why do I always feel like I'm always one step behind? In terms of layout, it really makes a difference whether you start early or late. Indexes can't keep up with the market, and we definitely can't keep up with the pace of institutions. It seems I need to change my strategy, or I'll really become the chives among chives. When consensus is formed, it's already too late. That really hit me. Lonely perseverance vs crowded regret, I feel like I'm occupying both sides... Should I buy now or wait a bit longer? I really can't decide.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 23h ago

The issue of index lagging, you see, is something that institutional investors have long seen through, as shown in the medical records. By the time MSCI announces it, the liquidity indicators have already been distorted. Don't wait for the outflow of funds to erupt before regretting it.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 01-20 18:56

Wait, have institutions already started their布局? Are we retail investors falling behind again? Smart money never waits for MSCI to speak. Are we really about to get cut this time? MSCI inclusion is just a confirmation that it's a done deal. Those who should have reacted early have already done so... Standing firm in solitude indeed makes money, but the key is that you must have that kind of resolve. In this wave of digital asset treasury, it feels like either you win by lying down or lose by lying down, no middle ground. Institutions are quietly sneaking in... but it's a bit late, and the real track can't be so obvious. Those waiting for the official MSCI announcement probably have their hands on the steering wheel, with eight or nine out of ten likely to take over.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCryer

· 01-20 06:26

Smart money has already jumped on board, by the time MSCI makes an official announcement, the flowers will have withered. Institutional investors thrive on information asymmetry, retail investors are always chasing highs and selling lows. This round of digital asset treasury activities, frankly, is just big funds laying out their plans. When the index is included, there will be another round of chopping the leeks... Early entrants are sipping tea, latecomers are crying in the wind—that's the market. Wait, does this logic also apply to other sectors? It seems that the hot projects lately all follow this pattern. Market fairness is a joke. Although people say that, the rich always make money, while the poor get harvested. The lagging nature of indices is really a trap; those following the index are just bagholders.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 01-20 06:21

Smart money has already jumped in, and we're still debating whether MSCI should be included. It's a bit late now. --- The index lag is really a thing; by the time it's officially announced, the flowers will have withered. --- So is entering now considered early or catching a falling knife? No one can say for sure. --- Digital asset allocation is indeed changing, but it still feels too early to draw conclusions. --- Lonely perseverance sounds very romantic, but I suspect it's just marketing talk. --- Institutions have already laid out their plans long ago; retail investors are only seeing it now—same old套路. --- Instead of waiting for MSCI confirmation, it's better to see who is actually buying. --- Thinking about this logic in reverse also makes sense; maybe it's the institutions setting the pace.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 01-20 06:14

Smart money has already jumped on board; by the time the index confirms, the hot flowers will have withered. Institutions are laying out plans in the shadows, while retail investors are still debating whether MSCI will include it—what's missing is that information gap. Those who hold firm are now the happiest, and this is the game rule of Web3. The pricing power has already shifted; MSCI is just a latecomer confirming it. To be honest, rather than waiting for official recognition, it's better to follow the footsteps of smart money.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullTherapist

· 01-20 06:09

Waking up too late makes you the bag holder. This wave, the institutions have already laid out the plan. It's really smart money leading the rhythm, retail investors are still debating when MSCI will include . Following the index is traditional, but this time it's really different. The treasury concept has already emerged. To be honest, the difference between steadfastly holding on alone and regretting after joining the crowd is just one thought. How do you choose? Whether MSCI is included or not is actually no longer crucial; what's important is whether you're still in the game now.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSunriser

· 01-20 06:09

Smart money is quietly accumulating. Once the index is included, it will be too late. Institutions have already made their moves, and we are still debating whether to get on board. The difference is right here. By the time MSCI confirms, the pricing power is long gone. Isn't this just the fate of the track? Waiting for confirmation to follow the trend is a sure way to be a bagholder. Last year, I was already paying attention to digital asset treasury. Now you're just hyping the concept? That's a bit late. Those who persevere in solitude will be the ones to laugh last. The lagging nature of the index—everyone who has played knows this.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-20 06:01

The smart money has already entered the market, so what are we still waiting for? Institutions are quietly positioning themselves; whether MSCI includes it or not isn't that important, right? It's that same old story of "the pricing power shifting when consensus is formed," I'm tired of hearing it. Those who stay committed alone make money, while those who follow the crowd lose money. Who doesn't understand this principle? Instead of waiting for the index to confirm, it's better to analyze it yourself first.

View OriginalReply0