Assuming the total target needs to reach a scale of 29 trillion: - 290 people each holding 1 trillion can achieve it - 2900 people each holding 100 billion can achieve it - 29000 people each holding 10 billion can achieve it
The key is to secure a 10 billion share In some emerging projects, early participants only need to join the community and share opinions, accumulating positions at zero cost.
If the global mainstream trading platforms can attract tens of millions of new users, the 10 billion units you currently hold, compared to the SHIB boom five years ago—equivalent to the growth space after spending 1000 yuan back then.
Community expansion = an accelerator for asset appreciation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainTherapist
· 01-20 06:11
Wake up, the 29 trillion algorithm is indeed a bit outrageous. Out of ten projects that entered with zero cost early on, nine end up as worthless tokens.
The story of SHIB is told every year, but how many actually make a profit? Community expansion ≠ asset appreciation; this equation often doesn't hold true.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 01-20 06:11
Basically, it's just gambling to keep bringing in new beginners. The SHIB wave did make some people get rich quickly, but most people are just bagholders.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 01-20 06:10
This mathematical model looks quite ideal, but the key is whether the computing power network can truly accommodate these new users.
Early zero-cost accumulation sounds great, but it really depends on ROI; don't just focus on the SHIB miracle.
Community expansion indeed drives up the price, but technological iteration support is necessary to sustain it.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractWorker
· 01-20 06:09
Another set of mathematical magic... SHIB's wave indeed made people money, but can it be replicated now? Feels like it's all just storytelling
---
Zero-cost position accumulation? Community fission can double? Just listen, don’t take it seriously
---
Always compare to history, but the problem is the market has already sniffed out this scent
---
Who will share the 29 trillion cake? In the end, it’s still the top players cutting the leeks
---
New user entry = asset appreciation? That logic is a bit too fantastical
---
Wait, isn’t this just a Ponzi argument in different words...
---
The algorithm has no flaws, but what about reality? The market isn’t that naive anymore
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedian
· 01-20 05:52
Laughing to death, it's the same billion-dollar fantasy math again
#美国核心物价涨幅不及市场预估 Asset Growth Mathematical Game
Assuming the total target needs to reach a scale of 29 trillion:
- 290 people each holding 1 trillion can achieve it
- 2900 people each holding 100 billion can achieve it
- 29000 people each holding 10 billion can achieve it
The key is to secure a 10 billion share
In some emerging projects, early participants only need to join the community and share opinions, accumulating positions at zero cost.
If the global mainstream trading platforms can attract tens of millions of new users, the 10 billion units you currently hold, compared to the SHIB boom five years ago—equivalent to the growth space after spending 1000 yuan back then.
Community expansion = an accelerator for asset appreciation.