2026-01-20 05:39:49

Community-driven token gaining momentum in the market. ZACK previously reached $140 million in trading volume, marking a significant milestone before earlier market corrections. The current iteration emphasizes full community ownership with no founder allocations or initial bundles, positioning it as a genuine community experiment. Traders monitoring emerging tokens are tracking this project's dynamics as it rebuilds narrative and ecosystem participation.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BtcDailyResearcher

· 15h ago

Wow, 14 billion in trading volume? How much popularity does it take to accumulate that? Is this version really zero reservations? I'm a bit curious to see how far it can go.

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 15h ago

theoretically speaking, if we model community ownership as a recursive verification function... the $140M volume spike actually mirrors what happens when you eliminate founder extraction vectors. it's like watching a zero-knowledge proof collapse back into transparent state — no hidden commitments, just pure interoperability between participants.

Reply0

SmartContractRebel

· 15h ago

I'm tired of the "no founder allocation" excuse. Who is really pulling the strings behind the scenes?

View OriginalReply0

SerumDegen

· 15h ago

yo $140m volume then straight to cascading liquidations lmao... "genuine community experiment" is copium speak for "founders got rekt too" ngl. rebuilding narrative = rebuilding positions probably. whale watching this rn but tbh no founder bags usually means retail holding the bags instead 💀 alpha leak or just another meme cycle?

Reply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 15h ago

No founder allocation? I've been through this before. I heard this same excuse back in 2018. A trading volume of 140M is basically just a self-sustaining cycle of a Ponzi scheme. Don't be fooled by the guise of "community experiment." In the end, it's just a scam that runs away.

View OriginalReply0

NeverVoteOnDAO

· 15h ago

No founder allocation? Sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be a scam to deceive the community again.

View OriginalReply0

MentalWealthHarvester

· 15h ago

Wow, 14 billion in trading volume? This guy was really popular before. Now that the community system has been restarted without a founder taking a cut... it feels a bit interesting, but I don't know how far it can go.

View OriginalReply0