2026-01-20 05:35:31

Recently, many retail investors are still blindly chasing the trend, only to be cut to shreds by various scam coins and newly launched projects.

Meanwhile, what are truly insightful funds doing? They are focusing on projects like Bittensor that are genuinely solving real-world problems. The performance data of $TAO is right there — projects like this have gains that are completely in a different league.

What’s the difference? Simply put, one is chasing the hot trend, and the other is strategically building an ecosystem with real application value. Very few projects in the crypto market can truly succeed; those that have innovative mechanisms, can be practically implemented, and generate sustainable revenue are often the ones institutional investors heavily favor. Bittensor’s subnet model is an example of this kind of promising experiment — it goes beyond mere token speculation, backed by real computing power and data flow.

That’s why choosing the right participation direction is crucial. Picking the right track can make all the difference in returns.

TAO-6,38%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ConsensusDissenter

· 16h ago

TAO this wave indeed has some substance, but to be honest, how many retail investors can really hold on? Frankly speaking, anyone still playing altcoins should wake up now. This wave is about cutting those who didn't see the right direction. I'm impressed with the subnet model logic; the computing power support is indeed much more reliable than pure speculation. Stop talking nonsense, those who truly make money are never those chasing the hot trends, do you agree? Bittensor's growth is right there; data doesn't lie, it all depends on whether you're willing to get on board.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 16h ago

To be honest, $TAO has indeed outperformed those chasing hot trends, but that's a bit too absolute to say... When it comes to computing power and data streams, they sound impressive, but I'm more concerned about the actual TVL of this subnet model—hopefully it's not just fake data pumped up by flash loans. Last year, I learned this lesson the hard way and ended up losing a lot. This time, looking at $TAO, I’ve become more cautious. I’d rather miss out on a 200% annualized return than go through another team run scenario. That's right, choosing the wrong track can lead to total loss, but the real question is how to identify which projects truly have application value in advance? Easy to say, hard to do. The information gap between retail investors and institutions is exactly here, but unfortunately most people can't react in time. By the time they do, they've already been liquidated. It feels like the market gameplay has changed again. APY is tempting, but I care more about whether the project team can survive the next bear market.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 16h ago

Honestly, those still chasing altcoins are just throwing their money away. TAO has truly nailed it this time; having real-world applications makes a big difference. Retail investors always make the same moves, and by the time they wake up, institutions have already left. The subnet model is a more reliable innovation than just hype concepts. Choosing the right track is more important than timing; I’ve realized.

View OriginalReply0