A well-known Web3 project's airdrop mechanism has attracted attention. The latest round of airdrop registration surprisingly requires a fee of $3.3, and users cannot confirm their eligibility before registration. This practice has sparked discussions within the community.
Investors who have been involved since the early stages of the project pointed out that there is a clear bias in the allocation process—many well-known individuals who have never actively participated in the ecosystem received substantial allocations, while long-term contributors received relatively limited benefits. This allocation logic has disappointed many ecosystem participants.
Industry observers believe that the project's lack of transparency and fairness in distribution can weaken community trust and also reflect logical issues in the airdrop design of some projects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCry
· 8h ago
It's the same old trick again, first make me pay and then tell me if I qualify? LOL
Long-term players get cut, big V influencers take whatever they want, this logic is just perfect.
What transparency are you talking about? Just rename it "Chives Cutting Fund" already.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 8h ago
$3.3$ USD fee not confirmed yet to claim? Isn't this just a disguised way of scamming users?
Big influencers blindly claiming large amounts, while those of us truly involved in the ecosystem hardly hold any coins. The logic is impeccable.
Another project with trust broken. This has been obvious from the start.
When someone becomes popular, they can just get free airdrops? Brothers, you're still dreaming.
Zero transparency and zero fairness. This is just a pattern of taking a cut and then running away.
I just want to ask, why do those accounts that haven't even used the platform end up getting the most?
Getting scammed again—that's the current state of Web3, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 8h ago
3.3 USD fee, still don't know if I can hit the jackpot. I've seen this trick back in 2021.
Another project claiming to be decentralized but actually doing centralized distribution, hilarious.
Relying on connections to get the big share, while those who actually do the work are left in the dust. Is this Web3?
Wait, why hasn't the community beaten them up yet?
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDay
· 8h ago
It's the same trick again, pay first and then see if you meet the criteria? LOL
Big influencers can get airdrops without issues, but us working folks have to pay taxes🤡
Is this what you call the democracy of Web3? I doubt it.
A well-known Web3 project's airdrop mechanism has attracted attention. The latest round of airdrop registration surprisingly requires a fee of $3.3, and users cannot confirm their eligibility before registration. This practice has sparked discussions within the community.
Investors who have been involved since the early stages of the project pointed out that there is a clear bias in the allocation process—many well-known individuals who have never actively participated in the ecosystem received substantial allocations, while long-term contributors received relatively limited benefits. This allocation logic has disappointed many ecosystem participants.
Industry observers believe that the project's lack of transparency and fairness in distribution can weaken community trust and also reflect logical issues in the airdrop design of some projects.