Looking at the current cycle of the crypto market, RWA tokenization is extremely hot, and everyone says this is the key to unlocking trillions of traditional finance into Web3. But the reality is quite sobering—why are institutional funds still hesitant to enter en masse? The reason is actually simple: how to maintain blockchain decentralization while also meeting strict financial regulations and business privacy? Sounds contradictory, right?

**Reframe the concept of privacy**

Many people misunderstand the privacy track, thinking that privacy is at odds with regulation. In fact, many projects have completely reversed this thinking. There is a Layer1 designed specifically for finance, which uses zero-knowledge proof technology to create a "programmable privacy"—it sounds sophisticated, but essentially: transaction information can be hidden from the public, protecting business secrets from leaks, while still being able to prove to regulators that the transaction is compliant and passes KYC/AML checks. This design approach is currently a scarce commodity across the entire track, which is also why very few infrastructures can truly support regulated securities and asset tokenization.

**Technology is more than just a story**

Having ideals alone isn't enough; technology implementation is crucial. This project has independently developed a virtual machine optimized specifically for ZK technology, maximizing efficiency. It can significantly reduce the computational costs of generating zero-knowledge proofs—which is critical for large-scale applications—while ensuring instant finality of transactions. In other words, there's no need to choose between performance and security.

If RWA is truly to move from concept to reality, infrastructure that can both meet regulatory requirements and protect privacy is probably unavoidable.