2026-01-20 05:33:09

Some developers really make questionable calls abandoning projects like Marc. Personally, I'm watching the CTO rollout closely—strong enough that I've actually been accumulating more rather than selling. The tech trajectory here seems legit worth backing.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SwapWhisperer

· 11h ago

NGL, Marc's recent operations were indeed disappointing, but this round of CTO updates actually look pretty good. I'm actually gradually increasing my position, and I feel the technical direction is worth a gamble.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainRetirementHome

· 01-20 06:00

Buddy, Marc's moves are indeed a bit disappointing, but this CTO's actions actually look pretty solid. I'm starting to increase my position.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 01-20 05:59

Marc quitting the project is honestly quite disappointing, but I have confidence in the CTO's current move. I'm quietly increasing my position, and this technical direction really feels promising.

View OriginalReply0

SigmaBrain

· 01-20 05:57

NGL, Marc's recent performance was a bit disappointing, but I believe in the CTO's move... I've been quietly accumulating all along.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 01-20 05:55

Everyone is trying to buy the dip, and I am quietly adding to my position. This CTO update seems genuinely promising without hype or negativity.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 01-20 05:40

ngl, marc's exit was messy but the cto moves? actually analyzing the codebase rn and red flags haven't surfaced yet. might be onto something here tbh

Reply0

BrokenDAO

· 01-20 05:37

Marc quitting again proves that—the worse the developer incentive mechanism is designed, the faster people will leave. I'm following the CTO's moves this time, but to be honest, I’ve always been skeptical of these kinds of "strong execution" commitments... Game theory tells us that individual profit maximization ultimately breaks through all governance layers. If you're now hoarding, you're still betting that the trust cost is lower than the expected returns. How long can this assumption last?

View OriginalReply0