2026-01-20 05:31:37

When someone calls out bad content, why shouldn't they earn a cut? The logic is simple—if creators get rewarded for engagement, critics who drive conversation deserve compensation too. It's about fair incentive alignment in creator economies. Web3 native platforms could flip this entirely: make critique valuable, not just creation.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FrontRunFighter

· 29m ago

nah this is just gamification on steroids... you're basically asking platforms to reward the *symptoms* instead of fixing the disease. MEV extraction but make it social lmao

Reply0

retroactive_airdrop

· 12h ago

Nah, this logic is a bit off... Why should critics get a share? Isn't this just making everyone want to ride the hype?

View OriginalReply0

degenwhisperer

· 12h ago

ngl, this logic is a bit crazy... Wouldn't that mean critics are going to threaten creators' livelihoods?

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 12h ago

I have to say, this logic sounds quite tempting but also a bit risky... If all criticism really turned into money, then there would be a flood of people nitpicking just to make a profit. Who would still care about content quality?

View OriginalReply0

PonziDetector

· 12h ago

ngl, this logic has some substance... but can critics really make money just by talking? It's still the platform that has the final say.

View OriginalReply0

HodlKumamon

· 12h ago

Hey, this logic is interesting, but in terms of data, can critics really drive engagement?熊熊 just looked at past research, and the conversion rate for controversial content is actually only about 42% of creative content(´；ω；`)

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero