How does a privacy public chain reshape financial infrastructure? From a technical architecture perspective, Dusk positions itself as a "financial-grade privacy dedicated lane"—building a privacy protection channel specifically for institutional investors on top of the high-speed public chain.



On the business level, it mainly targets three directions. First is securities tokenization (STO) and physical asset on-chain (RWA), where enterprises can complete token issuance, automatic dividends, and voting governance through privacy contracts, with shareholder information strictly confidential while being subject to audit supervision. This means that the financing function of traditional IPOs is moved on-chain, avoiding cumbersome compliance hurdles. Second is building DeFi infrastructure for institutions—lending, AMM, and other financial primitives—operating under institutional-grade security standards. Third is the full-process digitization of equity bonds, from issuance to settlement, flowing entirely on-chain.

What is the appeal for retail investors? Simply put, high-quality assets that only large institutions could access before are now available for ordinary investors to participate in. The transparency and efficiency of the entire ecosystem represent a qualitative leap compared to traditional financial systems.
DUSK1,01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
notSatoshi1971vip
· 01-20 05:56
Basically, it's about allowing retail investors to also play the game of institutions, but is this privacy system really reliable...
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflictvip
· 01-20 05:55
Wait, privacy protection + benchmarking IPO? Sounds great, but isn't this just a "compliance shell" with a different disguise?
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivorvip
· 01-20 05:52
Listen, it's another story about "avoiding compliance hurdles"... I've heard this too many times since 2018, and you all know how it turned out. Privacy, institutional-grade, high-quality assets—these talking points were used last time with Libra, and before that with EOS. Every project team can make such appealing claims. The real question is—who audits privacy contracts? How can on-chain "transparency" and "privacy" coexist? The logic itself doesn't hold up. Retail investors participating in so-called high-quality assets are essentially just taking the fall, just under a different guise of privacy. Let's wait and see how it unfolds. Don't get too confident.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivorvip
· 01-20 05:51
Is this another new trick to wipe out retail investors? Institutions play with privacy, we play with transparency, haha
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 01-20 05:36
Avoiding compliance thresholds? That sounds a bit risky, like playing with fire.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)