2026-01-20 05:28:22

In 2026, on the main AI track, the $SENT project has attracted considerable attention. The backing investment team is quite luxurious—Founders Fund( Peter Thiel's ) and Pantera Capital provide strong support, with top-tier Silicon Valley venture capital firms and leading institutions in the crypto circle both recognizing it. This configuration from the very beginning has destined the project for a long-term orientation rather than short-term hype.

Looking at the token economics, it’s even more interesting. Only 21% of the TGE circulating supply is in circulation, with the vast majority of tokens held by the community and airdrop addresses. Interestingly, this distribution rule is entirely set and controlled by the project team. This structural design finds a certain balance between the fundraising background and initial liquidity, and also reduces selling pressure after listing. Regardless of the long-term outcome, it at least shows that the team has done their homework on the token model.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OffchainOracle

· 12h ago

With the support of the Tilir system, it does have some substance, but the operation of 21% circulating supply... feels more like protecting the market. Is SENT really serious about getting things done this time, or just waiting to hype? Don't just talk about the team doing their homework; let the data speak after launch. The dual recognition from Silicon Valley and the crypto circle sounds great, but I'm just worried it might turn into another financial game.

View OriginalReply0

TheMemefather

· 16h ago

Circulating supply at 21%—to put it simply, it's just fear of dumping, smart move. Founders Fund backing is indeed impressive, but don't be blinded by the halo. A well-designed token model doesn't necessarily mean the price will go up. This is the key issue; I've seen too many projects with perfect economic models but fail quickly in the crypto world. The funds from the Thiel group just feel a bit different. With a 21% circulating supply, it will depend on whether the community can support it after launch. No matter how well said, ultimately, it still comes down to whether there are real application scenarios.

View OriginalReply0

ParallelChainMaxi

· 16h ago

Liquidity locked so tightly, aren't you afraid the community's gold plan can't hold? --- Founders Fund backing can stabilize? That wave in 2022 was also supported by big institutions, but what happened? --- 21% circulating supply sounds appealing, but I'm worried that airdrops might become a habit of dumping. --- Token model is fine, but the key is whether the team truly has technical expertise. --- Dual recognition sounds great, but everyone in crypto knows the tricks; in the end, it still depends on whether you can survive the bear market. --- The community controls the majority of the tokens? That's a significant risk. --- I've heard "long-term orientation" too many times; the market will speak. --- Silicon Valley endorsement + crypto community endorsement—this combination is rare, but it doesn't necessarily mean it will succeed. --- 21% is the circulating supply; when will the rest be unlocked? That's the key point. --- Designing the model is basic; the real test is the subsequent execution capability.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedDreams

· 16h ago

Ha, Founders Fund and Pantera are betting together. This lineup is indeed quite aggressive. I've seen the 21% circulating supply tactic quite a few times. Basically, it's about leaving enough room for themselves. Projects backed by the Thiel camp generally don't mess around, so I still have some confidence in that. Whether the tokenomics look good or not depends on the execution later. Liquidity is tight but not to the point of collapse. That’s definitely a calculated move. With such a low circulating ratio at TGE, early entrants need to be a bit patient. This setup puts control entirely in the hands of the team, sounds a bit familiar... Long-term orientation? Let’s see how it performs after launch.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c802f0e8

· 16h ago

Damn, Tilray + Pantera dual endorsement, this setup is indeed solid. 21% circulating supply... Oh, this is to prevent a dump, smart. --- Same old rhetoric, the financiers look glamorous but ultimately it's about user data. --- The tokenomics design is good, but can the community keep up? Feels like this round will again depend on who has more patience. --- Founders Fund endorsement is a gold medal, but 2026 is still far away haha. --- Having such a low circulating supply is actually good, at least in the early stages it won't be bloodshed, a pretty stable approach. --- Luxurious backers are just the beginning of the story, the real test is whether the product can be implemented. --- That 21% circulating supply number is tense... If the airdrop addresses are unlocked early, wouldn't that be the end? --- The token model looks fine, just worried that the community's enthusiasm might not meet expectations.

View OriginalReply0