Having looked at so many RWA projects, the套路 is basically the same: beautiful PPT → testnet demo → story line collapses. The root cause is actually not complicated; most teams simply haven't calculated the compliance accounting in the real world.
Dusk is different. From the very beginning, they didn't shy away from this challenge. Their DuskTrade is not about "potential future collaborations," but is deeply integrated with NPEX, which holds MT, Broker, and ECSP licenses, and has incorporated real securities assets on-chain within a compliant framework. This detail is particularly critical—it determines what Dusk is betting on. It's not betting on regulatory loopholes, but on regulatory certainty.
Coupled with DuskEVM's developer-friendly design and the auditable privacy solutions provided by Hedger, you see a complete closed loop: institutions are willing to use it, developers can build on it, and regulators can audit it. In the short term, it may not seem very sexy, but this kind of infrastructure is indeed rare in the RWA track.
Rather than saying you are bullish on a certain token, it's better to understand it as a "patience asset for infrastructure." When RWA truly enters deep waters, the ones that survive won't be the loudest, but the most solidly built.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 15h ago
The step of hardcoding the compliance framework on-chain is really impressive; no one really dares to do this.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxiety
· 15h ago
This is what I call a factual basis, not just a paper article. Compliance is really a tough nut to crack; most projects fail here.
---
The cooperation details with NPEX are indeed solid, not just empty promises. Betting on regulatory certainty is much more reliable than betting on loopholes.
---
The most solid architecture is the one that survives; there's no problem with that judgment. Short-term attractiveness isn't necessary; anyway, projects that rise quickly also fall quickly.
---
It's interesting that the audit and privacy aspects are well balanced. Both institutions and developers use this approach, and only then can this logic go far.
---
RWA is a track that requires patience; you can't rush it. Dusk's approach is much clearer than most projects and doesn't go astray.
View OriginalReply0
fren_with_benefits
· 15h ago
Haha, finally someone dares to directly say that most RWA are fake. Dusk's approach is indeed solid, not just blowing hot air and relying solely on PPT to scam funding, really sharpening the blade.
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteran
· 15h ago
Really, this is the real deal. I'm already tired of other RWA projects; there are a bunch of PPT masters, but truly compliant experts are a rare find.
Having looked at so many RWA projects, the套路 is basically the same: beautiful PPT → testnet demo → story line collapses. The root cause is actually not complicated; most teams simply haven't calculated the compliance accounting in the real world.
Dusk is different. From the very beginning, they didn't shy away from this challenge. Their DuskTrade is not about "potential future collaborations," but is deeply integrated with NPEX, which holds MT, Broker, and ECSP licenses, and has incorporated real securities assets on-chain within a compliant framework. This detail is particularly critical—it determines what Dusk is betting on. It's not betting on regulatory loopholes, but on regulatory certainty.
Coupled with DuskEVM's developer-friendly design and the auditable privacy solutions provided by Hedger, you see a complete closed loop: institutions are willing to use it, developers can build on it, and regulators can audit it. In the short term, it may not seem very sexy, but this kind of infrastructure is indeed rare in the RWA track.
Rather than saying you are bullish on a certain token, it's better to understand it as a "patience asset for infrastructure." When RWA truly enters deep waters, the ones that survive won't be the loudest, but the most solidly built.