In the current crypto world, attention is fragmented and emotions are constantly amplified. In such an environment, projects face two easiest paths: either riding the hot topics for traffic or following trends to create excitement. Short-term, this can indeed harvest a wave of popularity, but the cost is: projects increasingly resemble marketing tools packaged for sale rather than systems that can run well for several years.
Looking at those projects that truly attract sustained attention, scarcity is never about concepts and stories. The market is not short of grand narratives like "building an ecosystem," "developing infrastructure," or "creating the next-generation paradigm." But if you look closely, most projects are just a bunch of slogans—lacking genuine self-awareness, constantly changing stories, shifting directions, chasing hot topics, and ultimately becoming a blurry patchwork that looks like everything but is good at nothing.
By comparison, some projects appear much more clear-headed in their approach. They are not in a rush to hype concepts but focus on laying a solid foundation first: identifying a relatively clear main line, concentrating resources into it, and systematically filling in capabilities piece by piece. This sense of stability may seem conservative, but it’s actually clear-headed—maintaining clarity in a noisy environment itself becomes a competitive advantage.
From the perspective of short-term versus long-term, short-term spikes rely on emotional fluctuations, while long-term value depends on system design. What does a true system look like? It’s something that doesn’t depend on a single hot event or sudden incident, but is built step by step through continuous construction, ongoing delivery, and the accumulation of consensus. Only such projects can stand the test of time.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Web3Educator
· 8h ago
ngl this hits different... most projects are just playing narrative roulette at this point
Reply0
BlockchainBouncer
· 8h ago
There's nothing wrong with that, but right now too many projects are playing word games.
It's annoying to see projects constantly changing names and narratives. Truly valuable projects wouldn't go to such lengths.
Sticking to one path and working tirelessly is better than anything else.
That's why I only focus on the few that are quietly building; no matter how popular others get, I don't pay attention.
View OriginalReply0
memecoin_therapy
· 9h ago
You're absolutely right. Now, as long as you can tell a good story, anyone can raise funds, but very few can survive for more than two years.
Wanting to do everything means you end up doing nothing well—that's the curse of the crypto world.
Clarity itself is the most scarce resource, but unfortunately, most projects lack this awareness.
Those projects loudly claiming to build an ecosystem—nine out of ten are just PPT ecosystems.
Projects that focus on solid execution may seem boring, but that's the most reliable investment logic.
There's too much noise, and it's easy to get led astray. It's better to stick with projects that don't change their slogans and stay grounded.
Taking it slow is better than rushing, but the market doesn't give people that opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofster
· 9h ago
tbh this just sounds like "do the work instead of shilling" dressed up in philosophy. like yeah, we all know the difference between vaporware and actual protocol development. the issue is execution doesn't move price in bear markets so... naturally everything becomes marketing. can't blame projects for playing the game when that's literally how funding works rn.
Reply0
NotSatoshi
· 9h ago
Well said. Currently, most projects are just storytelling competitions, and how many are truly focused on doing the work?
The market is still there, the retail investors are still there, but truly rational teams are really scarce.
That's why I would rather spend three years with a boring project than follow those flashy concepts.
Laying the foundation may sound boring, but that's the real moat.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForever
· 9h ago
You said it perfectly. Right now, it's just a chaotic mix, daring to boast about everything.
Every day, someone claims to be about to overthrow something, but they haven't even written the code yet.
Honestly, projects that focus on building things quietly are extremely rare.
It's easy to tell a big story, but the hard part is convincing others that you can actually do it.
The most common thing in the crypto world is hype; execution is a real weakness.
These days, there aren't many projects that can truly hold a clear direction; most are just chasing trends.
Actually, I've noticed that what attracts me most are those quietly building behind the scenes. Look at how many top-tier projects are like that.
If you ask me, these projects that keep creating buzz every day will eventually fade away.
A bunch of concepts cobbled together, and in the end, everything is fake.
In the current crypto world, attention is fragmented and emotions are constantly amplified. In such an environment, projects face two easiest paths: either riding the hot topics for traffic or following trends to create excitement. Short-term, this can indeed harvest a wave of popularity, but the cost is: projects increasingly resemble marketing tools packaged for sale rather than systems that can run well for several years.
Looking at those projects that truly attract sustained attention, scarcity is never about concepts and stories. The market is not short of grand narratives like "building an ecosystem," "developing infrastructure," or "creating the next-generation paradigm." But if you look closely, most projects are just a bunch of slogans—lacking genuine self-awareness, constantly changing stories, shifting directions, chasing hot topics, and ultimately becoming a blurry patchwork that looks like everything but is good at nothing.
By comparison, some projects appear much more clear-headed in their approach. They are not in a rush to hype concepts but focus on laying a solid foundation first: identifying a relatively clear main line, concentrating resources into it, and systematically filling in capabilities piece by piece. This sense of stability may seem conservative, but it’s actually clear-headed—maintaining clarity in a noisy environment itself becomes a competitive advantage.
From the perspective of short-term versus long-term, short-term spikes rely on emotional fluctuations, while long-term value depends on system design. What does a true system look like? It’s something that doesn’t depend on a single hot event or sudden incident, but is built step by step through continuous construction, ongoing delivery, and the accumulation of consensus. Only such projects can stand the test of time.